Says right there it's been done with permission from the family, there's not much to complain about.
Says right there it's been done with permission from the family, there's not much to complain about.What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more money
seems kinda meta
They should have just replaced the voice from that point on,this AI bs needs to stop
What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more money
If they arent going to implement a UBI, they need to ban AI from creative industries and probably most industriesItll be a thing, but not until the last possible moment.
What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more moneyHe died. Seances are not legally binding either.
What about permission from the actual person?he's dead
They should have just replaced the voice from that point on,this AI bs needs to stop
What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more money
Lol this.
Fitting for a cyberpunk dystopian genre
he's deadAnd you know that how?
i don't think he minds
What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more moneyWell, he's dead, so I don't think he cares that much. And if we could ask him, I'm sure he'd be happy that his family could get some money to support themselves after his passing.
Do people freaked out because it's an AI? I have the feeling if it was a digitally altered voice to sounds like the deceased, it wouldn't gain controversy.It would, it's disrespectful stop making dead people work for you
Like the Disney CGI background people, people labelling it as an AI and ut gathered attention.
Well, he's dead, so I don't think he cares that much. And if we could ask him, I'm sure he'd be happy that his family could get some money to support themselves after his passing.What if he doesn't like the company or the game? They are making still work for them beyond the grave
Axiom posted...Yes or companies will keep making them work for them
Actors are really going to have to start writing into their wills don't use me for fucking ai aren't they?
If they arent going to implement a UBI, they need to ban AI from creative industries and probably most industriesare you losing work because an ai replaced you
It would, it's disrespectful stop making dead people work for you
are you losing work because an ai replaced youno
Didn't stop people from using dead people on their games. e/g : Onimusha 2.So just because those asses did it, it means that everyone else can do it too?
So just because those asses did it, it means that everyone else can do it too?
Yeah, sure.Tons of people do
Nobody minds except you.
What if he doesn't like the company or the game? They are making still work for them beyond the graveHe'd probably be happy knowing that his family can still make some money even if he's not alive.
Tons of people do
Take the flash movie it severly criticized for using dead actors in the movie
People have criticized marvel for stan lee cameos after the man died
Marvel aint stopping the cash flow from some criticismdidn't know that stan lee cameos was what was making marvel movies sucessful
If they arent going to implement a UBI, they need to ban AI from creative industries and probably most industriesnah , just like uber.. adapt or get left behind.. sorry, if the taxi drivers had to figure this shit out, now its the artist turn.
nah , just like uber.. adapt or get left behind.. sorry, if the taxi drivers had to figure this shit out, now its the artist turn.the issue is that jobs arent getting replaced at a 1:1 ratio. thats why UBI or banning AI is required. doing nothing will lead to riots and collapse of society
sucks when your work gets stolen and no one gives a shite because "Taxi Drivers suck Hurr Durr." Well artists suck.. hurr durr.
It was done with permission from the family.
And you know that how?
nah , just like uber.. adapt or get left behind.. sorry, if the taxi drivers had to figure this shit out, now its the artist turn.yeah screw people having jobs,when all these people defending A.I are starving in a curb somewhere with A.I doing their jobs they will get it
sucks when your work gets stolen and no one gives a shite because "Taxi Drivers suck Hurr Durr." Well artists suck.. hurr durr.
Dark_Arbron posted... Because hes dead. The electrical activity in his brain that made up his consciousness dissipated, thus meaning he doesnt exist anymore.and he still had wishes and still had a will, him existing or not doesn't mean he would be happy with it
I agree with you about AI, though.
yeah screw people having jobs,when all these people defending A.I are starving in a curb somewhere with A.I doing their jobs they will get it
and he still had wishes and still had a will, him existing or not doesn't mean he would be happy with it
also just because his flesh his dead you can't prove he doesn't exist, we can't yet see all forms of existence and there's also the fact that energy can't be destroyed,it had to go somewhere
What about permission from the actual person? The family might be just taking advantage to get more money
If they arent going to implement a UBI, they need to ban AI from creative industries and probably most industriesThat seems like a net lose to humanity more then anything.
Should they stop publishing books once the author is dead and the copyright passes to the family?that's not the same thing,that still their books,the author isn't appearing in someone else fictional work without his permission,fictional work that is being done for money, it's dead people being taken advantage off and it's weird like these types of things are getting more common,like those concerts where they use holograms of dead singers,it's all becoming very disrespectful and death cult like
Prismsblade posted... That seems like a net lose to humanity more then anything.more jobs and more real things made by real humans
Seriously, what would society gain from this exactly?
That seems like a net lose to humanity more then anything.yes, banning AI would be a net loss. Hence the ideal solution is implement UBI.
Seriously, what would society gain from this exactly?
that's not the same thing,that still their books,the author isn't appearing in someone else fictional work without his permission,fictional work that is being done for money, it's dead people being taken advantage off and it's weird like these types of things are getting more common,like those concerts where they use holograms of dead singers,it's all becoming very disrespectful and death cult likeYour complaint was that the family may be profiting by giving permission, which is absolutely the same thing.
the concept of a new voice actor getting million dollar contract will be impossible.
And you know that how?because he's dead, he no longer exists and is unable to have an opinion on the matter
more jobs and more real things made by real humansWe're at near record unemployment now so what are you talking about?
what does society earn by having A.Is take your job while you get nothing? A.I doesn't have much advantage to society
AI will not charge thatyou dont actually understand what Ai is, do you