Apparently it's happened before?This is what the FBI does.
As Ive argued on this blog and elsewhere for yearsand as (actual) journalists, lawyers and Human Rights groups have documented for much longerthe vast majority of the FBIs splashy terror arrests that our media repeats are, upon further inspection, pushed, designed, and curated by the FBI themselves and almost always involve no actual terrorists or terror groups beyond the ones simulated by undercover agents and informants.
Its one of the genuinely predictable facts of media criticism: See a headline about the FBI swooping in and foiling a terror plot, stopping terror financing, or thwarting a terror trip to Syria or Iraq, theres a 99 percent chance there was no actual terrorists involvedbut only an elaborate network of paid informants and undercover agents. And this isnt just a number pulled out of thin air: According to one 2013 study by researcher Trevor Aaronson, less than one percent of terror plots foiled by the FBI are real plots, in the sense that they would have occurred whether the FBI was monitoring them or not.
I'm pretty sure the FBI has a long history of foiling their own plots.To stop the terrorist, you must think like the terrorist even become the terrorist. Or something like that.
Idk how common this is in the US but may I recommend the band Liferuiner?Went to hs with those guys lol (they werent straight edge)
At least they arent plotting actual terrorist attacks, just spending our tax dollars catching fake terrorists to justify their budget. Now if they somehow were involved in false flag terror attacks and that was proven, that would be a far bigger story