COVxy posted...
Seems like a conservative approach is right for a streaming service that accepts uploads. Otherwise it'll very likely just be a giant repo for revenge porn and cp with plausible deniability.
Which is a viable business model under the "safe harbor" concept.
If you're "here's a video board, go nuts", all you're obligated to do is take down videos when someone complains. Once you start selling "premium" access and paying uploaders, your culpability increases substantially.
"Moderation" is pretty much either an all-or-nothing under section 230. Reactive or proactive, with nothing in between.