DeadBankerDream posted...
I dunno what his history. I made my judgement that his maliciousness was obvious based on the things he said in the topic.
Why?
I also made my judg(no e)ment based on what he said in the topic, and the mod handling the reports on them agreed. Without history of transphobia, there wasn't really a reason to go harder than a warning given the posts came across as misguided ignorance and failure to look into the context properly. It could have been dogwhistle bullshit but they would need history to determine that. I, like the mod, interpreted the posts as ignorance rather than malice.
Why? Because you ignored everything else that I said and cherry picked one thing to bitch about. I am generously providing you with a means to correct that problem.