If you are in a debate are you big enough to acknowledge someone's post as a valid point if they back it up with facts and sources even though it's counter to your argument no matter the poster's posting history?
Or do you resort to accusation of being a socket puppet or other insults because you can't acknowledge the poster was right and you were wrong or it challenged your world view?
I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski