Good as long as it is non gmo
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Stop spreading lies that non-gmo is not important
Ben111 posted...
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Stop spreading lies that non-gmo is not important
Sorry I dont follow orders from anti-vaxxers as a rule
GMO foods are quite widely regarded in the scientific community as completely safe and have greatly reduced world hunger
Back when I ate ice cream, that was my favorite flavor.
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Stop spreading lies that non-gmo is not important
Sorry I dont follow orders from anti-vaxxers as a rule
GMO foods are quite widely regarded in the scientific community as completely safe and have greatly reduced world hunger
Yes, I find Mead utterly detestable and a font of misinformation, but in the case of GMOs he's absolutely right. There has been no credible evidence to suggest that they're harmful to health and they're needed to feed a growing population. Plus they're more environmentally friendly in many cases.
Zeus posted...
Back when I ate ice cream, that was my favorite flavor.
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Stop spreading lies that non-gmo is not important
Sorry I dont follow orders from anti-vaxxers as a rule
GMO foods are quite widely regarded in the scientific community as completely safe and have greatly reduced world hunger
Yes, I find Mead utterly detestable and a font of misinformation, but in the case of GMOs he's absolutely right. There has been no credible evidence to suggest that they're harmful to health and they're needed to feed a growing population. Plus they're more environmentally friendly in many cases.
Lol you are so misinformed it hurts. If you think gmos are enviromentally friendly then your credability is in negative numbers. Gmos dont help feed more people. Stop spreading so much information.
Ben111 posted...
Zeus posted...
Back when I ate ice cream, that was my favorite flavor.
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Mead posted...
Ben111 posted...
Good as long as it is non gmo
There you go spreading pseudoscience again
Stop spreading lies that non-gmo is not important
Sorry I dont follow orders from anti-vaxxers as a rule
GMO foods are quite widely regarded in the scientific community as completely safe and have greatly reduced world hunger
Yes, I find Mead utterly detestable and a font of misinformation, but in the case of GMOs he's absolutely right. There has been no credible evidence to suggest that they're harmful to health and they're needed to feed a growing population. Plus they're more environmentally friendly in many cases.
Lol you are so misinformed it hurts. If you think gmos are enviromentally friendly then your credability is in negative numbers. Gmos dont help feed more people. Stop spreading so much information.
You're saying a food with a much crop yield than conventional farming doesn't help feed more people? How exactly does that work?
And GMOs are more efficient than conventional farming, meaning that fewer resources have to be wasted on them. Less arable land is used, less water is used, etc.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gmoanswers/2016/07/27/how-gmos-protect-habitats/#131db0031c38
http://agwired.com/2016/08/29/gmo-infographic-shows-impact-on-water-conservation/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gmoanswers/2016/08/30/gmos-water-balance/#d36ec56975a9
We can't afford to waste water on unsustainable organic farming which can't produce enough food to adequately feed a population anyway.
Zeus posted...
Ben111 posted...
Zeus posted...
Back when I ate ice cream, that was my favorite flavor.
Mead posted...
GMO foods are quite widely regarded in the scientific community as completely safe and have greatly reduced world hunger
Yes, I find Mead utterly detestable and a font of misinformation, but in the case of GMOs he's absolutely right. There has been no credible evidence to suggest that they're harmful to health and they're needed to feed a growing population. Plus they're more environmentally friendly in many cases.
Lol you are so misinformed it hurts. If you think gmos are enviromentally friendly then your credability is in negative numbers. Gmos dont help feed more people. Stop spreading so much information.
You're saying a food with a much crop yield than conventional farming doesn't help feed more people? How exactly does that work?
And GMOs are more efficient than conventional farming, meaning that fewer resources have to be wasted on them. Less arable land is used, less water is used, etc.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gmoanswers/2016/07/27/how-gmos-protect-habitats/#131db0031c38
http://agwired.com/2016/08/29/gmo-infographic-shows-impact-on-water-conservation/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gmoanswers/2016/08/30/gmos-water-balance/#d36ec56975a9
We can't afford to waste water on unsustainable organic farming which can't produce enough food to adequately feed a population anyway.
Your calling organic unsustainable? As opposed to gmo where all the toxic chemicals destroy the nutrients in the earth so that each year crop yields drop? You people are so brain washed that you think gmo is sustainable and organic is not lol
