LurkerFAQs,
Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ),
DB1,
DB2,
DB3,
DB4,
DB5,
DB6,
DB7,
DB8,
DB9,
DB10,
DB11,
DB12,
Clear
Last Topic: 7:35:26pm, 03/25/2024
Last Post: 9:55:42pm, 04/24/2024
Hikewne posted...
It really was hard to follow Idahos legal argument here. It seemed to be far reaching to the point that they want to invalidate EMTALA, but then it somehow became Idahos law is compliant with EMTALA.
Since when did bad legal arguments get in the way of the SC gutting both legal protections for people and enforcement tools for the federal government? Kav asking about the intent of the law is a pretty strong signal hell twist himself into knots to support Idaho. Thomas and Alito dont give a fuck so long as they can screw the liberals over (and anyone else along with them is acceptable collateral damage). Roberts and Gorsuch dont have any need for maintaining the pretense that theyre fair-minded. And I believe ACB is leaning against Idaho as much as I believed she was being honest about respecting Roe as settled law.