Poll of the Day > Kyle Rittenhouse says he's going to Texas A&M

(+) Yeah! (+)

Jen0125 posted...

what would you like me to say about that lol

Say what you see

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Suddenly US universities sound a lot less impressive.

It's pretty much Hufflepuff, we accept everyone (well, as long as you have money), not necessarily the best. Although, we do have quite a few major research universities such MIT, Northwestern, Harvard, ect that give the whole thing an air of credibility. Although, if you talk to any of the foreigners going to the US universities, they are mostly there because they couldn't get in the schools at home because thier scores weren't good enough. We're thier backup plan :( .

Isnt Hufflepuff actually like the best house though

look at Neville he had like the apex predator of glow ups

VampireCoyote posted...

Isnt Hufflepuff actually like the best house though

look at Neville he had like the apex predator of glow ups

Gryffindor attracts the brave, Ravenclaw the smart, Slytherin the, erm, racists & Hufflepuff everyone else. It is pretty much the normal type of houses, kind of boring and generic.

Raze_Razel posted...

Say what you see

I see pink neon light like you do. So I'm not sure what you're having an issue with lol

Jen0125 posted...

I see pink neon light like you do. So I'm not sure what you're having an issue with lol

He thinks that image is proof that everyone on the left is grooming children

Zareth posted...

He thinks that image is proof that everyone on the left is grooming children

yeah i know what he thinks

Zareth posted...

He thinks that image is proof that everyone on the left is grooming children

I love to read how you can explain how it's not.

That event in question was taken at an adult strip club, allowing children to enter, with "It's not going to lick itself" glowing in the background, it was also said they were teaching kids about drag, how to dance like a stripper, when grown men were throwing dollars at them......and that isn't grooming, how?

Jen0125 posted...

lol

...exactly....

Be coy and trolly all you want, but let's be real here. You and Zareth can 'try' and pull every excuse from your ass to say how this is not 'grooming' (and you'd fail since it's so obvious), but when so-called 'white-supremacists' start counter protesting, are you really surprised by their reaction? When these fringe groups become so 'empowered' they begin to overstep?

I mean are you two so eager to push the 'white man bad' narrative to cover up what grooming actually entails?

VampireCoyote posted...

Isnt Hufflepuff actually like the best house though

look at Neville he had like the apex predator of glow ups

Wasn't Neville a Gryffindor?

Neville wasn't Hufflepuff

Raze_Razel posted...

I love to read how you can explain how it's not.

Yes, that image represents every single person on the left. Absolutely every single one.

Zareth posted...

Yes, that image represents every single person on the left. Absolutely every single one.

yeah, that's not being disingenuous, is it...?

Just like how those 31 'white-supremacists' represents every single person on the right? ...that people like Jen would want you to believe?

But I would say that those on the 'left' aren't exactly admonishing those in the photo for the sake of maintain optics too right?\

Was it too hard for someone in the LGBTQ communities to say "maybe we shouldn't have kiddie-drag-grooming parties in strip clubs since we're fighting for equality here, this doesn't look good for the message, y'know!"

Metalsonic66 posted...

Neville wasn't Hufflepuff

hungrymike posted...

Wasn't Neville a Gryffindor?

well shit

i literally don't think being exposed to different types of people is grooming. you only think that because you believe the "normal default" is cisgender heterosexual. you only think it's grooming because you think they aren't valid. it's obvious to people who don't sit here and discriminate against others what your ideals are.

why do you believe drag queens are inherently sexual? many drag queens don't do anything sexual in their acts. they're performers, entertainers and comedians in costume. you're kind of weird to think that is inherently sexual because.. why?

and is it the strip club or the drag queens you have issue with? or both?

if you say you don't think drag queens are inherently sexual, do you still take issue with drag queen story hours at the public library? if so, why?

and also don't be disingenuous and say that i believe those 31 people represent the entire right. but they represent a larger than usual amount of them at this point in time. are we supposed to argue there are NO white supremacist domestic terrorism risks in this country because it makes you uncomfortable or hurts your feelings?

triple post lol but actually nevermind. i don't care what deranged things you are going to say. all i can say is that i hope you are a troll pretending to be deranged.

Jen0125 posted...

i literally don't think being exposed to different types of people is grooming.

"Exposed" is right..... Again, it's about optics. YOU might think it's all fine, and you would very wrong, and very disturbed if you did. Like maybe put yourself on a federal registry if that's the case.

you only think that because you believe the "normal default" is cisgender heterosexual.

I guess you have to get some kind of use for your gender studies degree.... but to prove you wrong, "normal" isn't taking impressionable children into an adult strip club.

you only think it's grooming because you think they aren't valid.

They aren't valid because they are groomers.

it's obvious to people who don't sit here and discriminate against others what your ideals are.

drop them buzzwords all you want, but you're still not arguing the evidence. Argue the point, not the person.

• Adult Strip Club
• "It's not going to lick itself"
• 5-6 year old children
• learning stripper moves
• throwing money at them

....this is not normal, even if you hide it behind some LGBTQ nobility, that is a toxic mix of what grooming is all about.

why do you believe drag queens are inherently sexual?

Why do you believe, that this is about sexuality.....what if it's about 'bolstering numbers'?

many drag queens don't do anything sexual in their acts.

Deflection.... what you believe isn't what is happening in the photo. You can't just start pointing at other drag events and show how it's NOT grooming anyone, (And I'll be fair, I agree, not all drag events are like that), but the argument is about this photo, and several incidences like that, even "Desmond is Amazing"....young children getting thrown into this ideology for

They're performers, entertainers and comedians in costume. you're kind of weird to think that is inherently sexual because.. why?

Because you have CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them. And to add the cherry on top, you have a sign saying "IT'S NOT GOING TO LICK ITSELF":....**Hey kiddo they're talking about ice-cream right? RIGHT?**.....NO, it's a sign about SUCKING COCK, they are teaching CHILDREN how to SUCK COCK and STRIP, in an ADULT CLUB.....FOR MONEY...all under the 'friendly' and "harmless' disguise of good ol' LGBTQ fun and "education"...

...feel free to remove your head from your ass so I can stop typing in caps, okay?

and is it the strip club or the drag queens you have issue with? or both?

Saying again: Because you have CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them. And to add the cherry on top, you have a sign saying "IT'S NOT GOING TO LICK ITSELF":....**Hey kiddo they're talking about ice-cream right? RIGHT?**.....NO, it's a sign about SUCKING COCK, they are teaching CHILDREN how to SUCK COCK and STRIP, in an ADULT CLUB, FOR MONEY...all under the 'friendly' and "harmless' disguise of good ol' LGBTQ fun and "education".../smh

Don't have a problem with strip clubs. Don't have a problem with RESPONSIBLE Drag Queens.....throwing impressionable children into the mix? When they themselves have no idea who they are? Well it's definitely an issue to at least 31 someones willing to crash a Pride Parade for....

Be clear here, you're not championing for some kind of gender parity activism. That argument is usually co-opt'd as a trojan horse to what's really going on in the seedy underbelly like this

if you say you don't think drag queens are inherently sexual, do you still take issue with drag queen story hours at the public library? if so, why?

Okay more deflection....you can't win on the CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them debate. You need to try and tip the scale with 'drag queen story hours'; then my answer is, depends on the story being told, depends on the audience too, and the parents who allow it.

and also don't be disingenuous and say that i believe those 31 people represent the entire right. but they represent a larger than usual amount of them at this point in time.

no, saying exactly THAT is being disingenuous...... "I'm not saying, what I exactly meant to say"....?

You're the one showing which flavour of Kool-Aid you drink already...

are we supposed to argue there are NO white supremacist domestic terrorism risks in this country because it makes you uncomfortable or hurts your feelings?

"hurt feelings" cute; nice try..... But yeah, if there is a nefarious scheme in grooming children in this way, you've have still yet to prove how this shouldn't be uncomfortable for anyone to see that. You're not winning any points for defend this, and there will always be those like the "31" plotting to counter-protest because people like you are trying to normalize such grooming practices...WHEN IT IS OBVIOUSLY GROOMING!

riple post lol but actually nevermind. i don't care what deranged things you are going to say. all i can say is that i hope you are a troll pretending to be deranged.

You're advocating for grooming CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them

....and I'm deranged.....lol, k....

Raze_Razel posted...

Saying again: Because you have CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them. And to add the cherry on top, you have a sign saying "IT'S NOT GOING TO LICK ITSELF":....**Hey kiddo they're talking about ice-cream right? RIGHT?**.....NO, it's a sign about SUCKING COCK, they are teaching CHILDREN how to SUCK COCK and STRIP, in an ADULT CLUB, FOR MONEY...all under the 'friendly' and "harmless' disguise of good ol' LGBTQ fun and "education".../smh

Don't have a problem with strip clubs. Don't have a problem with RESPONSIBLE Drag Queens.....throwing impressionable children into the mix? When they themselves have no idea who they are? Well it's definitely an issue to at least 31 someones willing to crash a Pride Parade for....

Be clear here, you're not championing for some kind of gender parity activism. That argument is usually co-opt'd as a trojan horse to what's really going on in the seedy underbelly like this

Okay more deflection....you can't win on the CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them debate. You need to try and tip the scale with 'drag queen story hours'; then my answer is, depends on the story being told, depends on the audience too, and the parents who allow it.

no, saying exactly THAT is being disingenuous...... "I'm not saying, what I exactly meant to say"....?

You're the one showing which flavour of Kool-Aid you drink already...

"hurt feelings" cute; nice try..... But yeah, if there is a nefarious scheme in grooming children in this way, you've have still yet to prove how this shouldn't be uncomfortable for anyone to see that. You're not winning any points for defend this, and there will always be those like the "31" plotting to counter-protest because people like you are trying to normalize such grooming practices...WHEN IT IS OBVIOUSLY GROOMING!

You're advocating for grooming CHILDREN, being taken to ADULT CLUBS, learning about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, and people are throwing MONEY at them

....and I'm deranged.....lol, k....

posts deranged rant

complains about being called deranged.

for someone trying to fight the "groomers", he sure does think about little kids having sex a lot.

anyways, it sure is democrats trying to fuck children

https://stuffthatspins.com/2016/04/28/who-has-more-sex-offenders-republicans-or-democrats/

even in 2016, this list was massive

for the red guys, anyways.

I'm not reading any of that lol

Jen0125 posted...

I'm not reading any of that lol

Probably for the best

Adam_Savage posted...

he sure does think about little kids having sex a lot.

And you spending a lot of time defending and/or deflecting away from that fact.

At least I'm trying to protect the children,...bigger question is, "Why don't you take a seat" and explain your angle in all this? What would you gain for succeeding into derailing the facts of the case like this?

link

Not bothering reading your obviously bias article that really doesn't prove anything except all pedo-groomers should be dealt with.

Did you expect me to crawl into a fetal position and admit defeat because a right-winger fucks kids too? I mean, what's ironic about something like that is someone teaching 'family values', and yet they violate children. That's his own brand of hypocrisy. While on the left, certain drag queens like GROOMING CHILDREN, by taking them to ADULT CLUBS, teaching them about STRIPPING and POLE DANCING, while people are throwing MONEY at them. With a sign in the room saying "IT'S NOT GOING TO LICK ITSELF" a sign about SUCKING COCK, they are teaching CHILDREN how to SUCK COCK and STRIP, in an ADULT CLUB, FOR MONEY...all under the 'friendly' and "harmless' disguise of good ol' LGBTQ fun and "education"

... well wouldn't that be holding them to the same standard? Wouldn't it? The community's struggle to find equality and legitimacy in regular society, but then (like said "Family Values Republican" or Jen's and the legit side of any particular feminism movement) there is always going to be someone in that group that is going to undo all that their group advocates for.

Except the catch is, if a "true" Family Values Republican caught a someone molesting children among their ranks, they would definitely 2A the creep and be done.

But you, Jen, ZangsBeard, and Zareth haven't denounced this practice at all. You're not managing your own. Even for the sake of preserving the optics to the greater message of equality. There's like 5 major things wrong in that photo, and all you're done it deflect and project, and given not one iota of proof saying otherwise. Instead you'd rather label with word like 'deranged' and 'troll'...and you still have no excuse proving me wrong.

Jen0125 posted...

I'm not reading any of that lol

HA...."triple post"..."I'm triggered!"......flip the switch and you're suddenly above it all. "There are no groomers within the LGBTQ community, despite photo evidence."

LinkPizza posted...

Probably for the best

...probably is, considering what they've been exposing about themselves on the topic.

Damn, he sure is obsessed with pederasty.

ZangsBeard posted...

Damn, he sure is obsessed with pederasty.

Projection...

I'm protecting children...and you're laughing at me for it....

Who's obsessed?

Raze_Razel posted...

Projection...

I'm protecting children...and you're laughing at me for it....

Who's obsessed?

You're really asking whose obsessed when I haven't brought it up at all? Interesting...

ZangsBeard posted...

You're really asking whose obsessed when I haven't brought it up at all? Interesting...

ZangsBeard posted...

Damn, he sure is obsessed with pederasty.

try again

Raze_Razel posted...

try again

I don't have to, I was literally responding to your, repeated, and bolded comments. If you can't figure out that's not bringing it up, when you've felt the need to hammer on the topic... well, it tracks for your posting style.

ZangsBeard posted...

I don't have to, I was literally responding to your, repeated, and bolded comments. If you can't figure out that's not bringing it up, when you've felt the need to hammer on the topic... well, it tracks for your posting style.

As opposed to calling me "obsessed" in the face of those on this thread who are defending this practice with their deflections and projections?

Why play at rhetoric games for something that any decent human being should be concerned about?

Nice obstinate refusal to acknowledge your own behavior. But we know you're unable to deviate even slightly from your current obsession.

Raze_Razel posted...

...probably is, considering what they've been exposing about themselves on the topic.

No. Its probably for the best because you dont seem like a good person. And seem to be biased against people who are different. Just because Im gay doesnt mean Im a predator Children learning about how relationships arent only between men and women, but between two men or two women is also ok. And can help kids who later do find out theyre not straight. It would have helped me some if I understood that I was allowed to be different Also, the stuff youre saying is really out there And its probably not worth the time to read anything you post as that seems like time wasting

Raze_Razel posted...

Except the catch is, if a "true" Family Values Republican caught a someone molesting children among their ranks, they would definitely 2A the creep and be done.

https://i.imgur.com/FaNxDFX.png

go for it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-matt-gaetz-pro-pedophile-sex-trafficking-investigation-2022-4

do it

LinkPizza posted...

No. Its probably for the best because you dont seem like a good person. And seem to be biased against people who are different. Just because Im gay doesnt mean Im a predator Children learning about how relationships arent only between men and women, but between two men or two women is also ok. And can help kids who later do find out theyre not straight. It would have helped me some if I understood that I was allowed to be different Also, the stuff youre saying is really out there And its probably not worth the time to read anything you post as that seems like time wasting

Your first mistake is rushing for that moral high ground of sanctimonious platitudes.

I'm not biased against anyone that is different, but if people in your camp are pushing envelopes to achieve that 'rent free' result. It's not going to work the way you think. Because like the rest, you refuse to even acknowledge what is going on in that photo to begin with. You have particular groups of so-called 'white supremacists' always ready to defend what's theirs. And all you got is gaslighting.

If you were truly so high n' mighty, then why not "educate" to me the value of having CHILDREN, in an ADULT CLUB, with a sign about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY......educate me on the inherent value to the cause.

Also, the stuff youre saying is really out there

Even if this a matter of discovering the simplistic nature of your own sexuality at a young age, explain how acting like a desirable fuck-toy for cash helps with that?

Not worth the time

Sure, because you have no excuse for this, in any proper corner of society (gay or otherwise) which is the bottom line here.

I get that it hurts like hell trying to get respect in this world, but you seriously think deflecting an issue like this helps? Especially when those you accuse of misunderstanding would rather band together and go the 'simple route'?

Adam_Savage posted...

go for it.

Ladies first.

BTW, your ID is named after a guy who molested his sister at young age....just sayin'....

you can shoot him too, if you want

i wont mind

after all, you are a "true" family values republican, right

Ah yes, the unhinged ranting continues. Can't wait to see how many more times he thinks repeating the same things over and over is going to help make his point as if anyone doesn't already know what he's attempting to say to begin with.

Adam_Savage posted...

you can shoot him too, if you want

i wont mind

after all, you are a "true" family value republican, right

Gotta love how he deflects from the post in order to try to turn it on you...

Raze_Razel posted...

Ladies first.

did you seriously try to insult someone by calling them a lady

what are you 6

Caps lock Cruise control for Cool

VampireCoyote posted...

did you seriously try to insult someone by calling them a lady

what are you 6

He's threatening to murder people because he has the right to bear arms against a tyrannical government... so yeah, that sounds about right.

Raze_Razel posted...

Your first mistake is rushing for that moral high ground of sanctimonious platitudes.

I'm not biased against anyone that is different, but if people in your camp are pushing envelopes to achieve that 'rent free' result. It's not going to work the way you think. Because like the rest, you refuse to even acknowledge what is going on in that photo to begin with. You have particular groups of so-called 'white supremacists' always ready to defend what's theirs. And all you got is gaslighting.

If you were truly so high n' mighty, then why not "educate" to me the value of having CHILDREN, in an ADULT CLUB, with a sign about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY......educate me on the inherent value to the cause.

Who rushing for any moral high ground? While I try to be nice, there are people way nicer than me here... So, you're first mistake was assuming... And what do you mean by "rent free" results. We just want to be treated as equals. And part of that is tolerance. And that begins at a young age. And if they grow up knowing about gay people from a young age, and understand that they aren't any different from them, that's how we breed tolerance. Learning at an older age becomes too late for some people. Hence why younger children should learn that gay people exist... As for that photo, I DON'T know what's going on as that's the first time I've seen the photo. So why would I acknowledge a photo when I don't know what's going on, and haven't seen it before this topic?

Raze_Razel posted...

Even if this a matter of discovering the simplistic nature of your own sexuality at a young age, explain how acting like a desirable fuck-toy for cash helps with that?

Again, I don't know what you're talking about...

Raze_Razel posted...

Sure, because you have no excuse for this, in any proper corner of society (gay or otherwise) which is the bottom line here.

I get that it hurts like hell trying to get respect in this world, but you seriously think deflecting an issue like this helps? Especially when those you accuse of misunderstanding would rather band together and go the 'simple route'?

The one deflecting is you. I don't know what's going on in that photo. But if you really think the whole gay community is like that, then you're either homophobic, or don't know anything about gay people at all... Most gay people are just normal everyday people, living normal everyday lives. Many you can't even tell are gay (You can pretend you do, but you won't, and trying to base it on stereotypes will get you nowhere)... You keep deflecting to that picture pretending like whatever happens in that picture is a common occurrence. But as far as I can tell, it's not a normal occurrence anywhere... But like I said, I also have no idea what the picture is at all... And trust me, when people are trying to ban gays and trans people, those people aren't the one willing to "band together" as you say...

LinkPizza posted...

Who rushing for any moral high ground?

You

While I try to be nice, there are people way nicer than me here.

Doubtful thus far

So, you're first mistake was assuming.

Assuming what? Grooming such as this is a black and white issue. Either you're all for the protection of children, or spend more energy trying to project away from it for a particular bias reason.

And what do you mean by "rent free" results

Glad you asked. The problem with "wokeness" (especially on manners like this) is that there are some who overstep their mandate to more than just basic across-the-board equality. It's not a manner of merely having other people earn respect for their agency, but to live "rent free" in their minds. Equality + Perks, and a little bit more, and a little more after that.... In your case, it's one thing to tell YOU it's okay to be gay, it's another to wrangle up 5 year olds, take them to strip clubs and teaching them to be adult performers working for cash. It's the whole "get them when they're young" adage playing out. They're not doing this for equality and winning the hearts and minds of people for acceptance....it's gerrymandering the vernacular, so to speak. trying to win over their own agency before they develop into reasonable adults with agency of their own. ... And anyone daring to speak out and question this, gets 'gaslighted'; falling back on the struggle for 'oh woe is me' equality. .....

A: "No, this isn't grooming your kids (when it actually is), you're just a bigot!
B: "Oh wait, I don't want to be a bigot, I'll back off."
A: "lol, rent free!...OKAY KIDDIES, AS THE SIGN SAYS: "IT'S NOT GOING TO LICK ITSELF!"

We just want to be treated as equals

Who's "we"? People of the gay community?....or these actual groomers?

And part of that is tolerance.

Sell it then... I've asked for an explanation on that picture, what am I supposed to tolerate?

Explain this:
https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/17/video-emerges-of-drag-kid-desmond-is-amazing-pretending-to-snort-ketamine/
(*I'd post the actual video, but it seems 'they' took it down....I wonder why)

And that begins at a young age. And if they grow up knowing about gay people from a young age, and understand that they aren't any different from them, that's how we breed tolerance. Learning at an older age becomes too late for some people. Hence why younger children should learn that gay people exist.

So answer the question that you're avoiding: "If you were truly so high n' mighty, then why not "educate" to me as to the value of having CHILDREN, in an ADULT CLUB, with a sign about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY......educate me on the inherent value to the cause."

I mean, it couldn't have been left with watching Netflix cartoons with the message SUBTLY put into them...like the "Dragon Prince", or "Steven Universe". Popular media is chalk full of "wokeshit" (despite failing revenues, different topic, I digress).. instead taking the depraved route of taking CHILDREN to an ADULT CLUB, with signs about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY.

As for that photo, I DON'T know what's going on as that's the first time I've seen the photo. So why would I acknowledge a photo when I don't know what's going on, and haven't seen it before this topic?

Don't cop out. You know the score. You know the arguments. This isn't a new topic. Desmond is Amazing isn't a new topic either. You're the "hero" here. You've placed the argument on your shoulders. The picture is pretty clear as day. That is an ADULT CLUB, those are children (I'd wager to be in the 5-6 year old range, kindergarten age)

Again, I don't know what you're talking about...

yeah...you do...

The one deflecting is you.

Deflecting what?...I've been pretty consistent with what I've been saying all along. "Protecting Children"...it's not a rocket science idea....

I don't know what's going on in that photo.

...taking CHILDREN to an ADULT CLUB, with signs about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY.

I mean, FFS, can you be mature enough to at least admit this happens?

But if you really think the whole gay community is like that, then you're either homophobic, or don't know anything about gay people at all.

Gaslighting.... you ASSUME that I assume this indicative of the entire gay community, you wish I thought like that to fit your narrative. Like I said about, about the "true" Family Values Republican pedo'...doesn't matter which side you're from, 'grooming is grooming, and grooming is bad, k?".... Just because you excel in your victimhood, doesn't pardon you from the deviance of such practices.

One doesn't have to be in the club to understand just basic principles of human decency. ...you're just fishing for every excuse to not call this grooming, because you represent a letter in the alphabet.

Most gay people are just normal everyday people, living normal everyday lives. Many you can't even tell are gay

Are they grooming children?....then I really don't care. Then can be gay all they want, whenever and wherever they want.

(You can pretend you do, but you won't, and trying to base it on stereotypes will get you nowhere).

That's the problem with stereotypes...they tend to be true... and if you're wasting energy saying, "it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen"....and WHEN (not if) it does, what are your excuses then? So back to my bigger question: If you were truly so high n' mighty, then why not "educate" to me as to the value of having CHILDREN, in an ADULT CLUB, with a sign about FELLIATO, teaching STRIPTEASING, for MONEY......educate me on the inherent value to the cause."
...and I'll double down...."what is the inherent value of teaching a kid like Desmond how to (pretend) snort up ketamine?"

You keep deflecting to that picture pretending like whatever happens in that picture is a common occurrence.

It's Pride month, isn't it.... It's common enough.

But as far as I can tell, it's not a normal occurrence anywhere..

Only where there is a significant LGBTQ community, major cities, blue states... wherever the term "camel-jockey" came from....

But like I said, I also have no idea what the picture is at all..

Third time you typed that....I don't believe you. You already hinted about your grasp on the subject matter. YOU KNOW what I'm getting at here. Be a bigger person and explain yourself, explain this, that's all I ask.....

And trust me, when people are trying to ban gays and trans people, those people aren't the one willing to "band together" as you say...

Let me elaborate on that comment,.... When you're not explaining yourself, you fail in relaying your message. The burden is on you. And instead of 'educating', you take that moral high ground and dodge the issue with deflection and projections; pure gaslighting. When photos and articles I've shown demand an explanation, and you're acting all high n' mighty on your laurels believing you don't have to explain anything because the gay community contains some super-secret knowledge about the universe that petty mortal could never understand......you think you're really winning the hearts and minds of people you demand blind respect from with that attitude?

...then you have people like Jen speaking about 'white supremacy', as if she doesn't quite understand that because people like her (and you) choose to speak for a marginalized community. You honestly think there are no repercussions when you refuse to fill in the gaps in the first place?

Photos like that prove the subtleties of grooming children, it's a fact. The burden is on you on proving how it's not. OR denounce the practice because it doesn't represent what the community is about.... But the truth is, you can't...you're coming up short on the explanations. Believing a void, or a lack of connection to the details, maintains the hazy smoke to dodge your own responsibility as a decent human being on the matter. You want the respect, understanding, and tolerance...well, this is how you start....but I'm not holding my breath, too much gaslighting already here.

...otherwise, that 'banding together' is the reactionary result of your own arrogant shortcomings....which has been the point of my ravings for the past page on this thread.

I dislike children

Is this guy still going about the neon lights being bad for kids

Raze_Razel posted...

.which has been the point of my ravings

https://i.imgur.com/eJqvFub.png

at least you aknowledge you are irrational, though that's putting it lightly

Jen0125 posted...

Is this guy still going about the neon lights being bad for kids

..and what did the neon sign say?....come on now, this is the comprehension part of the english exam.

Adam_Savage posted...

at least you aknowledge you are irrational, though that's putting it lightly

Your word, thrown back at you, nice try

you're literally the one who said it

it's your word