Poll of the Day > Apparently, unidentified remain have been found

(+) Yeah! (+)

And possibly belong to Brian Laundrie. They also found some of his items

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/brian-laundrie-s-personal-items-found-florida-nature-reserve-medical-n1281975

(Article provided by Mead) But you can also like Google it
---

That or serial killer Brian Laundrie is trying to cover his tracks by using the remains of another victim. Who knows how many people he's killed, and how many of those murders were covered up by his conniving family?

---

That is one of my theories. He just put his stuff with a dead body
---

Zeus posted...

That or serial killer Brian Laundrie is trying to cover his tracks by using the remains of another victim.

That was my first thought too.. waiting to hear on what remains they came across..

Anyway, a DNA test could tell everyone what's going on.. maybe buying him more time to get further away from the country

---

Welp, the ****** is dead


---

Yep. Confirmed now
---

Still really odd he was found with some of his stuff when he intentionally left other belongings of his behind

---

Zeus posted...

That or serial killer Brian Laundrie is trying to cover his tracks by using the remains of another victim. Who knows how many people he's killed, and how many of those murders were covered up by his conniving family?

JixHedgehog posted...

That was my first thought too.. waiting to hear on what remains they came across..

Anyway, a DNA test could tell everyone what's going on.. maybe buying him more time to get further away from the country

Your first thought was that it's a decoy placed by the family and not the obvious?

---

JixHedgehog posted...

Still really odd he was found with some of his stuff when he intentionally left other belongings of his behind

You thought he would be found naked and with nothing on him?

---

waiting to find out how he died

---

papercup posted...

Your first thought was that it's a decoy placed by the family and not the obvious?

Well, not necessarily his family (even thou they're sketchy af) maybe by a friend or he did someone in himself

Knowing what remains were actually found would've helped the general public determine who it may have been ect

---

papercup posted...

Your first thought was that it's a decoy placed by the family and not the obvious?

Considering the lengths Laundrie and his family already went to, and the fact they'd managed to conceal it well enough as to avoid a policy inquiry until social media blew it up, I'm *still* leaning towards it potentially being a fake. These are cold-blooded psychopaths. I don't put anything past them.

---

Remains could mean anything. One finger is technically human remains.

Losing an arm is bad. Life imprisonment and even losing you life via the death penalty is worse. What if they cut off his arm and dumped it there with maybe some of his stuff.

---

magemaximus posted...

waiting to find out how he died

This
---

HornedLion posted...

Losing an arm is bad. Life imprisonment and even losing you life via the death penalty is worse. What if they cut off his arm and dumped it there with maybe some of his stuff.

I heard they used dental records to identify him. So, I think his head was pry of the remains found
---

Someone said they couldn't figure out if it were human or animal remains at first.. guessing he got mauled by a gator?

---

JixHedgehog posted...

Someone said they couldn't figure out if it were human or animal remains at first.. guessing he got mauled by a gator?

Or he was transformed into a gator. Or maybe he was a gator all along, which would explain why he was a cold-blooded killer.

Or he tried to pass off a gator's remains as his own. Tossed a shirt on it, made a cast of the gator's teeth and then replaced it with his own dental records.

---

they just found elvis

---

This is giving me Joe Goldberg vibes

LinkPizza posted...

I heard they used dental records to identify him. So, I think his head was pry of the remains found

There goes my theory. But then that means he offed himself rather than be caught.

---

HornedLion posted...

There goes my theory. But then that means he offed himself rather than be caught.

Probably. I do wonder if he did Or if someone else got to him first. Maybe well get more information when we find out the cause of death
---

HornedLion posted...

There goes my theory. But then that means he offed himself rather than be caught.

Extremely common, and extremely sad. Many men would rather kill someone and kill themselves than deal with the reality of relationships. It's happened in my own family.

---

Pretty sure we still don't have a COD on those remains. If he actually died, it was likely by accident rather than something self-inflicted.

Plus the timeline is apparently still sketchy:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/22/us/brian-laundrie-parents-law-enforcement/index.html

---

ReturnOfFa posted...

Extremely common, and extremely sad. Many men would rather kill someone and kill themselves than deal with the reality of relationships. It's happened in my own family.

Yup. My cousin did this. Except he didnt kill his wife just assaulted her. Then killed himself.

---

no one really knows the situation everyone is pinning him as the devil but when arv was reading it didnt seem like she was a saint.

---

I think something ate him.

---

ArvTheGreat posted...

no one really knows the situation everyone is pinning him as the devil but when arv was reading it didnt seem like she was a saint.

What does that matter, he still murdered her

---

HornedLion posted...

Yup. My cousin did this. Except he didnt kill his wife just assaulted her. Then killed himself.

Wow, sorry to hear. Yeah, it was my mom's cousin and he was successful on both. I didn't know him but it was a slow day at work and they let me take a couple of hours off - felt weird as fuck.

---

gross arv

---

papercup posted...

You thought he would be found naked and with nothing on him?

I guess you could say he was wearing his laundrie

ReturnOfFa posted...

gross arv

What's even more telling is that Brisashi posted after arv and said NOTHING about it. Goes to show how selective and self-serving his outrage is.

---

papercup posted...

What does that matter, he still murdered her

Did they find proof to prove that? I cant remember I mean, its most likely him, but not proven
---

LinkPizza posted...

Did they find proof to prove that? I cant remember I mean, its most likely him, but not proven

Well, people are saying it was sketchy the way the parents found the remains... maybe the dad killed them both

OhhhJa posted...

Well, people are saying it was sketchy the way the parents found the remains... maybe the dad killed them both

It is sketchy that the parents found him. I was thinking the dad may have killed Brian. Not sure about Gabby, though
---

LinkPizza posted...

Did they find proof to prove that? I cant remember I mean, its most likely him, but not proven

its a forgone if not proven conclusion, she was strangled to death and he was sending fake texts from her phone after her death

---

Mead posted...

its a forgone if not proven conclusion, she was strangled to death and he was sending fake texts from her phone after her death

I mean, I think its him. But its not like we can go around saying it definitely was him Shit gets weird in the world sometimes
---

LinkPizza posted...

I mean, I think its him. But its not like we can go around saying it definitely was him Shit gets weird in the world sometimes

we likely wont learn much more than what we know now

---

Mead posted...

we likely wont learn much more than what we know now

Yeah. I agree. We most likely know everything that well ever know about this case
---

Why does everyone think the dad did it? It is more likely that Brian offed himself knowing that he would be a fugitive or be in jail the rest of his life.

The parents knew because that was his favorite park. That is why they were able to find him so fast

---

LinkPizza posted...

Did they find proof to prove that? I cant remember I mean, its most likely him, but not proven

Because innocent men pretty routinely go on trips with their fiancee, come back without them, don't even report the fiancee missing, and then go on the run -- while having their family lie for them -- when the cops come asking questions. Nothing suspicious about that at all!

LinkPizza posted...

It is sketchy that the parents found him. I was thinking the dad may have killed Brian. Not sure about Gabby, though

Wait, the parents found him? Yeah, I'm calling bullshit on this.

DragonClaw01 posted...

Why does everyone think the dad did it? It is more likely that Brian offed himself knowing that he would be a fugitive or be in jail the rest of his life.

lolwut? So he packed provisions, and went on the run... to kill himself? Kind of like how most people go grocery shopping, pay their bills, and order a pizza before killing themselves, right? Literally everything he did suggested he was going on the run. Nothing suggested suicide.

---

Zeus posted...

Because innocent men pretty routinely go on trips with their fiancee, come back without them, don't even report the fiancee missing, and then go on the run -- while having their family lie for them -- when the cops come asking questions. Nothing suspicious about that at all!

Never said it wasnt suspicious. But suspicious doesnt mean guilty. It just means suspicious

Zeus posted...

Wait, the parents found him? Yeah, I'm calling bullshit on this.

Yeah. Its a little weird
---

Zeus posted...

lolwut? So he packed provisions, and went on the run... to kill himself? Kind of like how most people go grocery shopping, pay their bills, and order a pizza before killing themselves, right? Literally everything he did suggested he was going on the run. Nothing suggested suicide.

Being on the lam for a prolonged period of time definitely can take a toll on your psyche. Not everyone has the ability to be a long term fugitive or live in the wilderness forever.

as for the cause of death, the body was almost completely picked apart by scavengers. It would be hard to determine death. The fact that he died close to the entrance indicates he most likely did not die of hunger or thirst.


---

LinkPizza posted...

Never said it wasnt suspicious. But suspicious doesnt mean guilty. It just means suspicious

When a loved one goes missing and not only do you leave the area but you don't even report them missing -- and then try to cover up the fact that they're missing -- that's a pretty reasonable suggestion of guilt.

DragonClaw01 posted...

Being on the lam for a prolonged period of time definitely can take a toll on your psyche. Not everyone has the ability to be a long term fugitive or live in the wilderness forever.

as for the cause of death, the body was almost completely picked apart by scavengers. It would be hard to determine death. The fact that he died close to the entrance indicates he most likely did not die of hunger or thirst.

However, if he killed himself, how would he have done it? If he used a weapon, it would have been found near the body. If he used a poison, he would have need to purchase it BEFORE going on his trek, and he likely wouldn't have prepared for a long journey if he knew he was going to die.

---

Zeus posted...

When a loved one goes missing and not only do you leave the area but you don't even report them missing -- and then try to cover up the fact that they're missing -- that's a pretty reasonable suggestion of guilt.

It normally is. And Im not saying otherwise. What I am saying is strange shit happens all the time. They have all kinds of weird things that can happen during cases. Like I said earlier, I do think its him. But we also cant just call him guilty because we think he is

Zeus posted...

If he used a poison, he would have need to purchase it BEFORE going on his trek

Unless he already had it or whatever
---

LinkPizza posted...

It normally is. And Im not saying otherwise. What I am saying is strange shit happens all the time. They have all kinds of weird things that can happen during cases. Like I said earlier, I do think its him. But we also cant just call him guilty because we think he is

Except we kinda can. We could call him guilty even if he wasn't, but he certainly is. And the fact that he's dead means he can't be convicted of the crime he definitely did.

LinkPizza posted...

Unless he already had it or whatever

...which comes back to my original point. Whether he bought or owned poison, the only reason you'd bring it is if you either planned to off yourself or somebody else. And there's no reason to pack a lot of provisions if you plan on offing yourself.

---

Zeus posted...

Except we kinda can. We could call him guilty even if he wasn't, but he certainly is. And the fact that he's dead means he can't be convicted of the crime he definitely did.

Except we literally cant actually call him guilty since theres no actual proof. Just speculation on everyones part

Zeus posted...

...which comes back to my original point. Whether he bought or owned poison, the only reason you'd bring it is if you either planned to off yourself or somebody else. And there's no reason to pack a lot of provisions if you plan on offing yourself.

While I dont think he offed himself, he could have brought it to kill someone else, but them took it himself when he realized he might not be able to get away with it
---

LinkPizza posted...

Except we literally cant actually call him guilty since theres no actual proof. Just speculation on everyones part

No, we literally can. Anybody can call anybody anything. It doesn't mean it's true or not, although in this case it's probably pretty true.

LinkPizza posted...

While I dont think he offed himself, he could have brought it to kill someone else, but them took it himself when he realized he might not be able to get away with it

If he actually died out there and the whole thing isn't a ruse (which it probably is), it's almost definitely death by misadventure (and quite literally)

(And who the fuck would he be bringing poison to kill out in the swamps? Shit makes no sense. Explanations need to be plausible.)

---

This is just a sad story no matter how you look at it and I guess no one will ever know what actually happened or why it happened,

---

Zeus posted...

No, we literally can. Anybody can call anybody anything. It doesn't mean it's true or not, although in this case it's probably pretty true.

And Im talking about in terms whether he is or isnt, and you know that based on the conversation weve be having. So if youre here to argue semantics, let me know so I can know our conversation is over. What Im saying (and have been saying) is we dont actually know if hes guilty or not Even if we think he is

Zeus posted...

If he actually died out there and the whole thing isn't a ruse (which it probably is), it's almost definitely death by misadventure (and quite literally)

(And who the fuck would he be bringing poison to kill out in the woods? Shit makes no sense. Explanations need to be plausible.)

People half asses plans and do stupid sh it all the time. Not to mention, the poison might not have been for someone in the woods. The woods could have just been the hiding place. Everything Ive said is pretty plausible You just dont like it and disagree

BUMPED2002 posted...

This is just a sad story no matter how you look at it and I guess no one will ever know what actually happened or why it happened,

Yeah. This is true. I will say that at least they found the bodies. Some people just go missing without bodies ever being found. And that can be even worse. At least there is a little closure with the bodies being found. But only a little. Most people still want to know what event led up to their deaths
---