Poll of the Day > Liberal Girl went MAGA HUNTING on BUMBLE and caught a CAPITOL RIOTER!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

A Woman only known as "Claire" is a liberal who disguised herself as a MAGA supporter on dating site BUMBLE to reel in suspected CAPITOL RIOTERS and bust them to the FBI!!

She reinstalled the app after a lengthy hiatus realizing she could help the feds catch conservative jerks and told Huff Post she deleted a photo of herself wearing a "vagina hat" at a feminist march and uploaded a generic looking shot of herself on a boat and changed her affiliation to conservative

And not long she caught the eye of 32 y/o Andrew Quentin Taake who sent her a photo of himself at the riot and BRAGGED of being pepper sprayed during the violence

Claire said "I was watching on the news and seeing everyone walk back. It felt kind of useless to me to be that close and not kind of do anything proactive about it"

She said it was an appeal from then president-elect Biden to catch rioters that made her do this and she said to herself "Ok, fine. i will"

Bumble allows female users to make the first move and initiate conversations and eventually matched Taake whos profile said he was just 8 miles away in Alexandria, Virginia

After exchanging enough pleasantries for Taake to let his guard down despite her "comical minimal ego stroking" she began probing him and fish for information learning he was the capitol and sent pics of himself to her as proof but then claimed there were ANTIFA members there trying to make them look bad

From the beginning many trump supporters claim antifa members were hiding in their group causing the clash to make them look as violent as they were

But claire managed to get a selfie photo he sent ot her of him and he hinted of his desire to cause further trouble ahead of the biden inauguration when he said "There is too much criminal stuff to come out. There are many many willing Patriots and wiling to head back to DC depending on what happens"

Once she felt confident he was a capitol rioter, she culled his profile and discovered the name of the business he co-owns and then to his FB along with 3 other MAGA capitol rioters who he communicated with and passed it to the FBI

She basically asked him "Wow, crazy, tell me more on repeat until they gave me enough. One of my friends was like, you basically got all these confessions just being like, haha then what"

3 months later an FBI agent contacted her to ask for more info and by 6 months, taake was finally arrested where he whipped and pepper sprayed police and yet even though he admitted to taking part, he was still trying to woo conservative by bragging about his "once in a lifetime" moment...

He even met up with claire, just days later and he gave her enough information to send him away.

Though Bumble only displays first names, he was identified as the owner of Hi-Flow Houston, a power washing service where the FBI zeroed in on him and discovered a number of his friends who were at the riot as well.

He is now charged with assaulting, resisting or impeding certain officers and obstruction

Taake said through his attorney that this was an ENTRAPMENT and should not be used against him in court for her illegal fishing of information

Do you think what Claire did was "entrapment"?

https://i.imgur.com/eTp7Orf.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/n7z4VO9.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/U3dEswy.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/P1uVCSN.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/xhqxQ6w.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/g73Y0SJ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/z6BKMYn.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/cAqsUJC.jpg
---

No pics of this story's hero Claire?! :(

---

I have no idea how that could be considered entrapment.

---

Now if only people had done this sort of thing for the rioters who burned down businesses, vandalized property, and looted anything not nailed down across most of the major cities of the country last summer.

ya, entrapment only applies to police. if a regular person put a "steal this" sign on a stack of money that just so happened to be next to a SWAT van...... not entrapment

---

Reigning_King posted...

Now if only people had done this sort of thing for the rioters who burned down businesses, vandalized property, and looted anything not nailed down across most of the major cities of the country last summer.

so delusional for you to even act like the two are similar

one was a crime committed by a small number of individuals and the other was a directed attempt at overthrowing democracy

---

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think what Claire did was "entrapment"?

Depends on your definition of entrapment? afaik, the legal definition involves law enforcement enticing civilians to break the law so they can arrest them for breaking the law. You might be able to extend that to people working with law enforcement to do the exact same thing, or even people working on their own do it, but... he'd already done the crime?

What she did was scummy (because trolling dating sites is inherently scummy, and there were likely a lot of guys she fucked with to conduct her amoral interrogations), but I don't think it was entrapment.

Full Throttle posted...

Taake said through his attorney that this was an ENTRAPMENT and should not be used against him in court for her illegal fishing of information

I would actually be pretty curious to see the legal rationale for the entrapment argument.

---

Mead posted...

so delusional for you to even act like the two are similar

one was a crime committed by a small number of individuals and the other was a directed attempt at overthrowing democracy

So looting, vandalization, assault, and so on are ok in your book as long as it's just criminals being scum and isn't overtly political? What are you trying to say? Why do you think that me wanting criminals to be held accountable in that instance means I somehow don't want them to be held accountable in this instance? Jesus Chirst political thinking really does a number on people's reasoning ability.

Also way to out yourself as the delusional one when you say the crimes were done by a small number of people. Yeah, I'm really sure it was just like a dozen people who cleared out all those stores and caused all the destruction. There are plenty of pictures online if you need a reminder of how bad things got.

Why are you taking the malicious misinformer's post seriously? Just don't engage with him.

---

Reigning_King posted...

Now if only people had done this sort of thing for the rioters who burned down businesses, vandalized property, and looted anything not nailed down across most of the major cities of the country last summer.

Why?

Riots work.

---

Imagine being so ignorant that you take someone saying that a relative handful of disorganized rioters looting a Best Buy doesn't compare to hundreds organizing an attack on the nation's capitol as meaning riots are A-ok lmao

Shitposters gonna shitpost I guess

---

Far-Queue posted...

hundreds organizing an attack on the nation's capitol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkQFhkpSeTk

---

This happened in like February.

Why do you keep reposting the same articles, months later?
---

Zeus posted...

Why are you taking the malicious misinformer's post seriously? Just don't engage with him.

This is the first time I've laughed at a Zeus post. Good job!

---

Shes clearly not using the site as intended

---

Reigning_King posted...

Now if only people had done this sort of thing for the rioters who burned down businesses, vandalized property, and looted anything not nailed down across most of the major cities of the country last summer.

There were more than 10,000 arrests as a result of the property crime you are talking about last summer.

---

Zeus posted...

Depends on your definition of entrapment? afaik, the legal definition involves law enforcement enticing civilians to break the law so they can arrest them for breaking the law. You might be able to extend that to people working with law enforcement to do the exact same thing, or even people working on their own do it, but... he'd already done the crime?

What she did was scummy (because trolling dating sites is inherently scummy, and there were likely a lot of guys she fucked with to conduct her amoral interrogations), but I don't think it was entrapment.

I would actually be pretty curious to see the legal rationale for the entrapment argument.

She used her free time to help capture criminals and you call her scummy.

---

kangolcone posted...

There were more than 10,000 arrests as a result of the property crime you are talking about last summer.

And how many of those arrests resulted in substantial charges instead of people spending a night or two in jail and then being cut loose? How often did the media decry the chaos and put the names and faces of the criminals in headlines?

Reigning_King posted...

And how many of those arrests resulted in substantial charges instead of people spending a night or two in jail and then being cut loose? How often did the media decry the chaos and put the names and faces of the criminals in headlines?

Moving the goal posts again I see. The woman here actually isnt in control of sentencing at all. So even if similar actions had been taken to identify the people over the summer, they would not then have changed either the charges then or now. Nor would it have changed sentencing outcomes.

You dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.

---

Full Throttle posted...

Quentin Taake who sent her a photo of himself at the riot and BRAGGED of being pepper sprayed during the violence

Weird flex.

kangolcone posted...

Moving the goal posts again I see. The woman here actually isnt in control of sentencing at all. So even if similar actions had been taken to identify the people over the summer, they would not then have changed either the charges then or now. Nor would it have changed sentencing outcomes.

You dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.

An arrest without prosecution is obviously not the same thing as being charged with a crime, you bring up the number of arrests was pointless in the first place. Also pointless is you implying that I was implying this woman had anything to do with sentencing or that I even take issue with her. Way to reveal your posts are fueled by a political agenda, sorry but mine are based on justice and morality so I doubt we'll see eye to eye on this.

Reigning_King posted...

An arrest without prosecution is obviously not the same thing as being charged with a crime, you bring up the number of arrests was pointless in the first place. Also pointless is you implying that I was implying this woman had anything to do with sentencing or that I even take issue with her. Way to reveal your posts are fueled by a political agenda, sorry but mine are based on justice and morality so I doubt we'll see eye to eye on this.

You said, why didnt people do this for the property damage of last summer. Then you brought up sentencing. Those are entirely unrelated. Thats why I felt the need to let you know she doesnt control sentencing because clearly you conflate the two in this topic.

Nor once has a political agenda come through as they are all factual statements in my previous posts. Are you saying facts are political?

---

kangolcone posted...

You said, why didnt people do this for the property damage of last summer. Then you brought up sentencing. Those are entirely unrelated. Thats why I felt the need to let you know she doesnt control sentencing because clearly you conflate the two in this topic.

Nor once has a political agenda come through as they are all factual statements in my previous posts. Are you saying facts are political?

The point of exposing criminal behavior is to have said criminal arrested AND charged with the appropriate crime and if found guilty given an appropriate sentence. Do you think this women would have wasted her time doing something like this if she knew that the guy would just be released the next day? Obviously the two are connected, I can't believe I have to point this out to you. Again just spouting off "well some rioter were arrested..." is a worthless statement since the whole point is supposed to be what comes after the arrest.

You really have the audacity to claim you don't have a political bias here despite that disgusting sig you have? Right, someone who thinks violence is an acceptable substitute for debate wouldn't have a problem with violent looters and thugs "on their side" getting away with their crimes with nothing but a mere arrest I suppose.

Reigning_King posted...

The point of exposing criminal behavior is to have said criminal arrested AND charged with the appropriate crime and if found guilty given an appropriate sentence. Do you think this women would have wasted her time doing something like this if she knew that the guy would just be released the next day? Obviously the two are connected, I can't believe I have to point this out to you. Again just spouting off "well some rioter were arrested..." is a worthless statement since the whole point is supposed to be what comes after the arrest.

You really have the audacity to claim you don't have a political bias here despite that disgusting sig you have? Right, someone who thinks violence is an acceptable substitute for debate wouldn't have a problem with violent looters and thugs "on their side" getting away with their crimes with nothing but a mere arrest I suppose.

So then the issue you have is that property crime is not viewed with the same sentencing guidelines as invasion of a federal building and assault on law enforcement. That has nothing to do with this woman identifying people nor lack of use of dating apps to have people who committed property crimes arrested. Again, you dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.


---

Reigning_King posted...

Way to reveal your posts are fueled by a political agenda

It's always funny when propagandists try to make say this

---

kangolcone posted...

So then the issue you have is that property crime is not viewed with the same sentencing guidelines as invasion of a federal building and assault on law enforcement. That has nothing to do with this woman identifying people nor lack of use of dating apps to have people who committed property crimes arrested. Again, you dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.

Just because you are incapable of following a proper conversation thread doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about. Do yourself a favor and reread my posts from the beginning if you want to stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense, I literally already covered the point you're trying to "get me" with.

Also bravo on not even bothering to try to deny the implications of your sig, I'm glad you can be truthful about that even if the truth isn't a good one.

Reigning_King posted...

Just because you are incapable of following a proper conversation thread doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about. Do yourself a favor and reread my posts from the beginning if you want to stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense, I literally already covered the point you're trying to "get me" with.

Also bravo on not even bothering to try to deny the implications of your sig, I'm glad you can be truthful about that even if the truth isn't a good one.

I do not view the Nazi party as a valid political platform. We fought an entire war about it. However, in no way does my political alignment, negate that I literally made factual statements.

You said its bad that nobody did this for property crime over the summer. Then when pointed out that more than 10,000 arrests were made, you complained about sentencing. We do not know Mr Taakes sentence yet, we only know of his arrest. Therefore your first complaint about no woman using a dating app to find people guilty of property crime is not at all related to the sentencing guidelines laid out by the US legal system.


---

kangolcone posted...

I do not view the Nazi party as a valid political platform. We fought an entire war about it. However, in no way does my political alignment, negate that I literally made factual statements.

You said its bad that nobody did this for property crime over the summer. Then when pointed out that more than 10,000 arrests were made, you complained about sentencing. We do not know Mr Taakes sentence yet, we only know of his arrest. Therefore your first complaint about no woman using a dating app to find people guilty of property crime is not at all related to the sentencing guidelines laid out by the US legal system.

Great to know that you think if you can physically over power someone or some nation with acts of violence that is a better way to invalidate their beliefs than rational debate. Also your insistence on calling the wide spread violence, looting, and civil unrest "property crime" to try to sugar coat it is very telling.

Anyways:
Reigning_King posted...

Do yourself a favor and reread my posts from the beginning if you want to stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense

Reigning_King posted...

Great to know that you think if you can physically over power someone or some nation with acts of violence that is a better way to invalidate their beliefs than rational debate. Also your insistence on calling the wide spread violence, looting, and civil unrest "property crime" to try to sugar coat it is very telling.

Anyways:

Like I said, I do not view the tenants of the Nazi party as worthy of debate. The people who engaged in political discourse with the Nazi party ended up with their countrys Capital being firebombed.

Im sorry that your lack of history knowledge led you to believe that the Nazi party has a history of openness where they peacefully coexist along the political spectrum.

I would be interested to know which ideals the Nazis hold which you do believe would make for good discourse.


---

Ehh why bother having a discussion when I can just say "Well my dad would beat up your dad" like a 2nd grader and leave it at that?

Antbregante posted...

I have no idea how that could be considered entrapment.

Its only entrapment if she went like undercover on the day of the riots and helped coerce him into doing it. Revealing him isnt entrapment you are right.

Reigning_King posted...

Ehh why bother having a discussion when I can just say "Well my dad would beat up your dad" like a 2nd grader and leave it at that?

Im giving you an opportunity to show the world how closed minded I am. Please tell me which part of the Nazi ideology and political platform you view as worthy of discussion.

---

Reigning_King posted...

So looting, vandalization, assault, and so on are ok in your book

there you go creating another false strawman, predictable as ever

---

america needs more riots

---

kangolcone posted...

I do not view the Nazi party as a valid political platform. We fought an entire war about it. However, in no way does my political alignment, negate that I literally made factual statements.

You said its bad that nobody did this for property crime over the summer. Then when pointed out that more than 10,000 arrests were made, you complained about sentencing. We do not know Mr Taakes sentence yet, we only know of his arrest. Therefore your first complaint about no woman using a dating app to find people guilty of property crime is not at all related to the sentencing guidelines laid out by the US legal system.

Then what's the point of your sig if the Nazi party was disbanded in 1945?
---

Revelation34 posted...

Then what's the point of your sig if the Nazi party was disbanded in 1945?

Do you think there are no longer people who identify with / perpetuate Nazi propaganda?

---

Clench281 posted...

Do you think there are no longer people who identify with / perpetuate Nazi propaganda?

He specifically said Nazi party.
---

kangolcone posted...

Im giving you an opportunity to show the world how closed minded I am. Please tell me which part of the Nazi ideology and political platform you view as worthy of discussion.

You don't need to give me any chances, you've done a better job at proving how close minded you are with every post than I could hope to.

Mead posted...

there you go creating another false strawman, predictable as ever

And there you go ignoring most of my post because you can't tackle it. Also lol at "false strawman" as apposed to what, a true strawman?

Revelation34 posted...

Then what's the point of your sig if the Nazi party was disbanded in 1945?

I was unaware that ideology and platform ceased to exist because a country lost a war. Lmfao. Is your point really that you think Nazis and people who believe Nazi ideology no longer exist?

---

Reigning_King posted...

You don't need to give me any chances, you've done a better job at proving how close minded you are with every post than I could hope to.

And there you go ignoring most of my post because you can't tackle it. Also lol at "false strawman" as apposed to what, a true strawman?

Ok, so which piece of Nazi ideology or political platform do you view as worthy of debate?

---

kangolcone posted...

I was unaware that ideology and platform ceased to exist because a country lost a war. Lmfao. Is your point really that you think Nazis and people who believe Nazi ideology no longer exist?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79594424?page=3#38
---

__starsnostars posted...

No pics of this story's hero Claire?! :(

How else are we going to know if she's hot or not?

---

Revelation34 posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79594424?page=3#38

Right, again, the party losing doesnt mean their political platform no longer exists nor does it mean there arent people who ascribe to it.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-party-platform

I can do all sorts of googling to better educate you if need be.


---

Revelation34 posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79594424?page=3#38

theres also this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nazi_Party?wprov=sfti1

And yes, I know the officially disbanded in the 80s, but it sure shoots a hole right through your 1945 horse assery.

---

kangolcone posted...

Ok, so which piece of Nazi ideology or political platform do you view as worthy of debate?

You really have trouble following posts don't you? If you were paying attention you wouldn't have to keep asking that worthless question.

Reigning_King posted...

You really have trouble following posts don't you? If you were paying attention you wouldn't have to keep asking that worthless question.

Ok, which piece of Nazi ideology or the political platform do you consider worthy of debate?

---

Reigning_King posted...

And there you go ignoring most of my post because you can't tackle it.

ignoring most of your post because its whataboutism drivel at its most obnoxious

---

Literally acting like a child deliberately trying to annoy an adult. I shouldn't be surprised that it's coming from someone who thinks might makes right, I really should stop wasting my time on cases like his.

Reigning_King posted...

someone who thinks might makes right

so youre just inventing things now? You really gonna just be Zeus 2.0?

---

Reigning_King posted...

Literally acting like a child deliberately trying to annoy an adult. I shouldn't be surprised that it's coming from someone who thinks might makes right, I really should stop wasting my time on cases like his.

The only thing deliberate here is your avoidance of a direct question.

If you find the questions annoying, I would not ask it again if you answered. You have said you view Nazis as having valid political view points worthy of discussion. Im simply seeking to explore which parts of Nazi ideology you feel are worthy of discussion and defense.

---