Poll of the Day > Straight males and females, would you choose to be homosexual if it was possible

(+) Yeah! (+)

Ganstaz003 posted...

I'm pretty sure some asexual people would totally disagree with you, and tell you that they can feel just as intimate, if not more intimate with a person without sex as a sexual person can through sex.

I've never had sex but I feel close to people who mind fuck me. Does this count?


---

Ganstaz003 posted...

I already get the 'female perspective' from non-sexual female partners like my mothers and sisters. That should be enough. May be I should've reworded this better: What can my sexual female partners provide me that my brothers or male friends couldn't? I can't think of anything.

That wasnt what you asked at first. In that reply, you said, and nobody so far has been able to provide me one thing a female can provide me outside of sex that my male friends can't. You never said the female had to be a sexual partner. This is women is general. Especially since other may not have female family members or might not have time to call and find one in all cases... But if you want to go that far, you still havent provided anything a male can provide that a female cant. Because as I stated, all the BS you mentioned before is wrong...

Ganstaz003 posted...

And yes, males have more in common with each other than males and females overall, for the most part. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having segregated sports. Instead, everything would be mixed. Males vs females. But of course, the fact that males aren't allowed to face females in sports and vice versa, proves my point.

Segregated sports means nothing, though. Thats for averages. And even then, I know people who would pick a female on their team instead of a male based on how they play. Even tennis has mixed. Maybe if they were more mixed sports, things could changed. Who knows? But that still proves nothing. Ive seen both men and women who were great at sports, or who sucker. Being a male or female doesnt decided if youre good or not. Being good at the sport does... I bet an all female sports team who actually plays and practices a sport could easily beat males who dont ever play the sport and are just bad at it. Though, according to you, that should be impossible. So it actually proves nothing.

Ganstaz003 posted...

And the fact that males numerically dominate females in certain fields and vice versa, proves that males and females aren't quite as similar as many people would want to believe they are. And there is nothing wrong with that!

Again, thats wrong. The reason that could be is that they may look for different work. And because the people hiring can be sexist. Im on the Air Force. Ive seen many female doing jobs people would usually think are for men. And most of those females can end up
Being way better. And they could end up being better than most people because they are trained to do their job. It has nothing to do with being a male or female. Its about being trained to do the job...

Ganstaz003 posted...

Be a more compettive sports partner.

That seems pretty sexist. Because while I cant be 100%, Im pretty sure both Williams sisters could beat most of the men and women on this board in tennis. Not only that, whole men are On average bigger and such, that doesnt mean all women are just shit. Most can still get stronger or be better at many different things.

Ganstaz003 posted...

Have mutual understanding together of what it means to be a male We can both understand each other in a way a female could never understand me. Such as the needs of a male.

Just because youre both males doesnt mean your needs are exactly the same. For example, I believe you said you were asexual, right? But Im not. My needs include sex. But if youre asexual, then your needs dont include that. In that case, my needs when it comes to sex are closer to a female who feels the same rather than you, who is also a male...

Either way, I agreeing with adjl (I think), or whoever it was that said you just seem like a sexist... Because thats the vibe Im getting from your posts...
---

Ganstaz003 posted...

Be a more compettive sports partner.

On average, but friendships are with individuals, not averages. I know plenty of girls who could sports circles around plenty of guys I know. If you were hypothetically limiting yourself to only ever being friends with either males or females, going with males would have the greatest chance of getting you more competitive sports partners, but that would be stupid and is not at all how social interaction works.

Ganstaz003 posted...

Have mutual understanding together of what it means to be a male We can both understand each other in a way a female could never understand me. Such as the needs of a male.

How often do you sit around with your bros and talk about "the needs of a male" or "what it means to be a male"? That just sounds like some kind of weird philosophical circle jerk. For that matter, you already have that understanding yourself, so what would somebody else with the same understanding bring to the table? That just seems like it would be redundant. Is it not more useful and enriching to have people with different experiences and understandings to offer you different perspectives (which, incidentally, is what actually happens when you interact with anyone, regardless of sex)?

Really, about the only thing girls can't understand is what a handjob/blowjob feels like. That's one definite advantage of homosexual relationships, though even then there are plenty of variations in individual experiences and preferences that mean that understanding isn't absolute.

---

adjl posted...

How often do you sit around with your bros and talk about "the needs of a male" or "what it means to be a male"?

I mentioned this earlier, as well. I said that even with my BF, we dont sit around talking about what its like to be a male...
---

LinkPizza posted...

Either way, I agreeing with adjl (I think), or whoever it was that said you just seem like a sexist... Because thats the vibe Im getting from your posts...

Honestly, I'm getting less of a sexist vibe and more of an "alien pretending to be human" vibe. Most of his participation in this topic seems to boil down to "I am a Completely Normal Human. I wish to optimize my Normal Human Relationships to enrich my experience as a Completely Normal Human. Please explain to me which genitalia are superior." That's including some sexism, but mostly in the form of extreme surface-level generalizations that suggest he's never actually experienced human interaction outside of what Wikipedia has been able to tell him about gender stereotypes.

---

adjl posted...

Honestly, I'm getting less of a sexist vibe and more of an "alien pretending to be human" vibe. Most of his participation in this topic seems to boil down to "I am a Completely Normal Human. I wish to optimize my Normal Human Relationships to enrich my experience as a Completely Normal Human. Please explain to me which genitalia are superior." That's including some sexism, but mostly in the form of extreme surface-level generalizations that suggest he's never actually experienced human interaction outside of what Wikipedia has been able to tell him about gender stereotypes.

Yeah. Thats true.Now that you say that, I can definitely see it...
---

Giving this country's conservative stance on homosexuality, I seriously doubt anyone would "choose" to be gay or lesbian much the way most people wouldn't "choose" to be a Black person knowing the history of how Black people in America have been treated who in their right mind would choose to be mistreated.

---

BUMPED2002 posted...

Giving this country's conservative stance on homosexuality, I seriously doubt anyone would "choose" to be gay or lesbian much the way most people wouldn't "choose" to be a Black person knowing the history of how Black people in America have been treated who in their right mind would choose to be mistreated.

Shit, if I was given the choice, I would still be black. And I feel the majority of black people would agree.

---