Current Events > Cyberpunk delayed to September 17

(+) Yeah! (+)

Tropicalwood posted...

$180 isn't that much,

For a lot of people it most certainly is.

---

Tag Team back again
Check it to wreck it, let's begin
Party on party people let me hear some noise
DC's in the house jump jump rejoice
Says there's a party over here, a party over there
Wave your hands in the air shake your derriere
These three words mean you're gettin' busy
Whoomp there it is
Hit me

---

l KNEW IT I FUCKING KNEW IT

---

it hurts.

but id rather wait than deal with the shit show of a broken release like no man's sky or.. anything from EA lately.

THIS IS GOOD GUYS DONT PANIC

JUST DONT

DONT

CRY

;_;

---

Damn i wouldve liked it if it was delayed say 3 months so i can finish RE3 and FF7remake. But 6 months, i gotta find something to bridge that gap.

---

Cobra1010 posted...

But 6 months, i gotta find something to bridge that gap.

the new animal crossing

---

Very disappointed but if it makes for a better game then ok. Basically going to be dry for the next few months until TLoU2 comes out in May.

---

HerpToTheDerp posted...

it got pushed back because it pitied ff7 if anything

Lol keep dreaming

---

chrono625 posted...

For a lot of people it most certainly is.

only cause a lot of people are addicted to drugs (cigarettes and alcohol count)

seriously, 180 isnt a lot if you have a job, most people have jobs (in 1st worlds)

kylobrr posted...

only cause a lot of people are addicted to drugs (cigarettes and alcohol count)

seriously, 180 isnt a lot if you have a job, most people have jobs (in 1st worlds)

Wat

---

Right on my birthday, niiiice
---

chrono625 posted...

Wat

180 is only a lot of money if you waste it daily

kylobrr posted...

only cause a lot of people are addicted to drugs (cigarettes and alcohol count)

seriously, 180 isnt a lot if you have a job, most people have jobs (in 1st worlds)

https://i.imgur.com/ych7zgZ.gif
---

Blue_Inigo posted...

Lol keep dreaming

i will because the only way ff7r will actually be good is in my dreams lmao

HerpToTheDerp posted...

i will because the only way ff7r will actually be good is in my dreams lmao

Lmfao
---

Good. I think people forget just how glitchy Witcher 3 was when it came out. There were a LOT of bugs and graphical glitches. The camera literally moved in snaps. Very poor frame rate. Broken quests. Broken menus. Broken map. Movement so bad they went and created an entirely different movement mode.

If the delay means we skip that phase of the game then good.
---

I bet the same people criticizing Square for delaying FF7 are praising CD Projekt Red for this move. Drones!

---

CDPR did something similar with the Witcher 3, delaying it a few months. When it did release, it was much more polished than the usual for AAA games lately, so I trust this company a lot more than most.

spanky1 posted...

Good. I think people forget just how glitchy Witcher 3 was when it came out. There were a LOT of bugs and graphical glitches. The camera literally moved in snaps. Very poor frame rate. Broken quests. Broken menus. Broken map. Movement so bad they went and created an entirely different movement mode.

If the delay means we skip that phase of the game then good.

I got it at release & didn't run into any of these bugs.

garan posted...

I got it at release & didn't run into any of these bugs.

The console versions had a few issues.

---

If it weren't for the reputation of the developers this would scream vaporware

---

The_Scarecrow posted...

I bet the same people criticizing Square for delaying FF7 are praising CD Projekt Red for this move. Drones!

cdpr is delaying a full product. square cant even release 15% of a game that came out 20+ years ago on time despite having more resources

HerpToTheDerp posted...

cdpr is delaying a full product. square cant even release 15% of a game that came out 20+ years ago on time despite having more resources

Doesnt matter. Both games were delayed but since one developer is more well liked than the other, its suddenly okay.


---

MacadamianNut3 posted...

If it weren't for the reputation of the developers this would scream vaporware

Games get delayed pretty regularly.

---

Cyberpunk 2077 has been in development since at least 2013 tho

This article turned 7 a few days ago

https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/11/3866014/cyberpunk-2077-teaser-trailer-released

---

March and April were too crowded anyway, I like this move.

---

The_Scarecrow posted...

Doesnt matter. Both games were delayed but since one developer is more well liked than the other, its suddenly okay.

both games were delayed but only one will be complete. it's not that hard

MacadamianNut3 posted...

Cyberpunk 2077 has been in development since at least 2013 tho

This article turned 7 a few days ago

https://www.theverge.com/2013/1/11/3866014/cyberpunk-2077-teaser-trailer-released

Yeah because they announced it basically as soon as they started. Most games are announced way later.

That was close to two years before Witcher 3 finished.

---

They got scared of FFVII.
---

HerpToTheDerp posted...

both games were delayed but only one will be complete. it's not that hard

And like I said, it doesnt matter. Both games are still delayed. Like you said, friend, its not that hard. I shouldnt have to spell it out like this but Ill make an exception just for you. Address my point on how its okay for one dev to delay but not okay for the other. Otherwise, forfeit your weak argument because you purposely didnt address that.

@HerpToTheDerp

---

i got the perfect reaction. it's old but it fits.
when finding out the game got seriously delayed:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_7lw4QJoAA
---

The_Scarecrow posted...

And like I said, it doesnt matter. Both games are still delayed. Like you said, friend, its not that hard. I shouldnt have to spell it out like this but Ill make an exception just for you. Address my point on how its okay for one dev to delay but not okay for the other. Otherwise, forfeit your weak argument because you purposely didnt address that.

@HerpToTheDerp

are you seriously asking me why it's okay for one dev to delay the release of a full game and not okay for another dev to delay the release of only 15% of a game? it's clear the reason you don't like to spell things out is because you can't even spell let alone read.

Good. I'd rather wait so they can put more effort in it and fix bugs than have an unfinished mess now.

---

Firstly imagine thinking Cyberpunk ran scared of VII Remake. Imagine being that stupid.

Secondly every year we go through this and people act so stupid about it. "Zomg year of teh delay". This...happens...every...fucking...year.
---

HerpToTheDerp posted...

are you seriously asking me why it's okay for one dev to delay the release of a full game and not okay for another dev to delay the release of only 15% of a game? it's clear the reason you don't like to spell things out is because you can't even spell let alone read.

"It's not a full game b-because I say so!"

So that's your argument? How laughable. If Square Enix consider the remake to be a full game, you cannot argue that despite your own personal feelings. You may have that opinion and that's fine but it is not fact so stop acting like it is. This may be a brand new concept to you but you have to stay as objective as possible when debating these types of things.

I'll ask you one more time to actually address my point, okay? Why is it okay for one developer to delay a game but it is not okay for another developer to delay a game? Answer the question. To be honest, I already know what you want to say. I just want to see you say it so we can end this.

---

The_Scarecrow posted...

"It's not a full game b-because I say so!"

So that's your argument? How laughable. If Square Enix consider the remake to be a full game, you cannot argue that despite your own personal feelings. You may have that opinion and that's fine but it is not fact so stop acting like it is. This may be a brand new concept to you but you have to stay as objective as possible when debating these types of things.

I'll ask you one more time to actually address my point, okay? Why is it okay for one developer to delay a game but it is not okay for another developer to delay a game? Answer the question. To be honest, I already know what you want to say. I just want to see you say it so we can end this.

more like it's not a full game because it ends at midgar which is only 15% of ff7. square has acknowledged this to be everything but a full game considering they're calling it part 1. you know what a part is right? a part is not a whole.

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished project"
*releases game that can be played beginning to end* = okay

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished product"
*releases 15% of a game that can't be played to completion until 10 years have passed and every other part is released*

to answer your question

Why is it okay for one developer to delay a game but it is not okay for another developer to delay a game?

one game will be good. the other won't. this has nothing to do with developers so you can stop shilling for square. if they made me wait for good complete product id give them the same pass im giving cdpr. delays happen in the industry all the time. the key thing to look at is what's being delayed. not who's delaying it. stop being so fucking dense

If this means they have less crunch I'm all for it

---

Rather a delay then it coming out in the same state Witcher 3 did.

---

garan posted...

I got it at release & didn't run into any of these bugs.

Which means no one else did?

---

HerpToTheDerp posted...

more like it's not a full game because it ends at midgar which is only 15% of ff7. square has acknowledged this to be everything but a full game considering they're calling it part 1. you know what a part is right? a part is not a whole.

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished project"
*releases game that can be played beginning to end* = okay

"we're going to delay this game to ensure you get a fully finished product"
*releases 15% of a game that can't be played to completion until 10 years have passed and every other part is released*

to answer your question
one game will be good. the other won't. this has nothing to do with developers so you can stop shilling for square. if they made me wait for good complete product id give them the same pass im giving cdpr. delays happen in the industry all the time. the key thing to look at is what's being delayed. not who's delaying it. stop being so fucking dense

Ah, I see. So you just have some weird vendetta against Square. Again, just because you do not consider it to be a full game, that does not mean its not a full game. Time to get that through your skull, friend. Your argument is laughable as I said.

There is no guarantee that the FF7R releasing in April wont be good. Again, youre not remaining objective even though I specifically told you to remain as objective as possible. Must I spoon feed you again? Were running out of cereal, HerpToTheDerp. I thought we were past this already. Admit that youre giving CDPR a pass and not Square because youre upset with the direction of FF7R. You can stop beating around the bush.

B-but its not a full game because I said so!
Youre just shilling for Square!

Good lord, thank you for the laughs. I hope you were baiting me because if not then yikes on your part. By the way, the producer of Square called this a solid, standalone game but Im sure you knew that, right? At least, I hope you did.

---

you do realize the entire game was datamined by the demo right? again, this isn't about the developers. i hold nothing against square personally. the only one not being objective here is you. we've seen everything ff7r has to offer in terms of gameplay depth and we know all the story content and what the game entails from the datamine. im not giving cdpr a pass over square. im giving cyberpunk a pass over ff7.
from the very beginning i placed my emphasis on the product being delayed and not who's delaying it. there's literally been no beating around the bush. how hard is it to understand that i hold no bias over developers and am instead focusing on the product they're pushing. it doesn't get any more objective than that. especially when im looking at the hard data presented in the leaks

also games completeness is arbitrary in the context you use it.

HerpToTheDerp posted...

you do realize the entire game was datamined by the demo right? again, this isn't about the developers. i hold nothing against square personally. the only one not being objective here is you. we've seen everything ff7r has to offer in terms of gameplay depth and we know all the story content and what the game entails from the datamine. im not giving cdpr a pass over square. im giving cyberpunk a pass over ff7.
from the very beginning i placed my emphasis on the product being delayed and not who's delaying it. there's literally been no beating around the bush. how hard is it to understand that i hold no bias over developers and am instead focusing on the product they're pushing. it doesn't get any more objective than that. especially when im looking at the hard data presented in the leaks

also games completeness is arbitrary in the context you use it.

Wait a moment, in your last post, you specifically mentioned that if Square made you wait for a good complete product, you would give them the pass that youre giving CDPR. Now, youre saying that you are giving Cyberpunk a pass over FF7R and its not about the devs? Why are you switching gears?


---

The_Scarecrow posted...

Wait a moment, in your last post, you specifically mentioned that if Square made you wait for a good complete product, you would give them the pass that youre giving CDPR. Now, youre saying that you are giving Cyberpunk a pass over FF7R and its not about the devs? Why are you switching gears?

lol im not switching gears. you're arguing semantics considering my sentiment is the same regardless of how you word it. im giving one game a pass over another. by extension i am giving whoever gives me that game a pass. however, the fact remains im only giving them a pass for that specific game. the focus of both statements is the product that's being delayed. your attempt to argue semantics furthers my point. if im willing to give square a pass depending on the quality of their game then it shows that the only thing i care about is the game that's being delayed. my point is and always been what im waiting for makes a difference.
HerpToTheDerp posted...

cdpr is delaying a full product. square cant even release 15% of a game that came out 20+ years ago on time despite having more resources

I've always placed a larger emphasis on the product

If only SE would delay FF7R now. I know they already cut the game into 1/3rds, but I still dont trust them to release a complete product after FF15.

---

yeah. if ff7r got delayed another year or two with the intent of being completed and released as a whole, i legit wouldn't trip.

HerpToTheDerp posted...

lol im not switching gears. you're arguing semantics considering my sentiment is the same regardless of how you word it. im giving one game a pass over another. by extension i am giving whoever gives me that game a pass. however, the fact remains im only giving them a pass for that specific game. the focus of both statements is the product that's being delayed. your attempt to argue semantics furthers my point. if im willing to give square a pass depending on the quality of their game then it shows that the only thing i care about is the game that's being delayed. my point is and always been what im waiting for makes a difference.

I've always placed a larger emphasis on the product

This is honestly pathetic at this point. You literally said two different things in two of your posts and claim I'm "arguing semantics". How about you stay consistent in your own argument so that I don't point out the discrepancies you are making? It's either about the devs or about the games themselves. Stop trying to have your cake and eat it, too. Bait or not, I will make an appropriate tag for you moving forward. Oh, and do try to use half decent punctuation in the future. You are not a child, I think. Thank you.


---

Womp womp

---

"youre changing your argument"
me:*highlights my first post on the matter and points to how my argument has literally remained the same*

you: "why one developer get pass and other not?"
me: "game"

ive said multiple times if square were delaying a good game, then i wouldnt mind. so this:

Whether or not Square delayed the game, you still would be shitting on it because your mind is already made up.

its not too wrong. i was shitting on the game before it was delayed. this highlights the fact that my focus has been on the game.

a delayed game is good

as ive said, ff7r wont be good. thats the issue ive had. this delay won't change that. the only thing they can add at this point is some polish.

yes, it's semantics. it's okay to be wrong. it's clear youve already conceded my points in your heart but youre trying to save face and refuse to do that here. its clear it goes beyond shilling. you asked a stupid question and were given an answer that highlighted your ignorance of the matter was and can't cope with the fact.

furthermore, you feeling you need to attack my grammar and punctuation is a show of that. textbook deflection. you say you arent arguing semantics yet you double down and shift focus to that? its the internet dude. theres no need to be so formal or take things so seriously, so ill continue to type however i please.

I am tired of this.

---