Poll of the Day > MAGA Alert: tRump plans Mass Immigration Raids Next Week

Topic List	Page List: 1
pionear 06/20/19 11:50:13 AM #1:	https://wapo.st/2WPDxah You was warned! <cite>pionear posted [p:923590575] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>https://wapo.st/2WPDxah You was warned!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanonsSpirit 06/20/19 11:53:45 AM #2:	But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again? --- https://imgur.com/tsQUpxC Thanks, Nade Duck! [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] <cite>GanonsSpirit posted [p:923590729] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
KJ StErOiDs 06/20/19 12:23:32 PM #4:	GanonsSpirit posted... But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again? The Electoral College. --- A plethora of DKC-related fanart to numb your mind: http://kjsteroids.deviantart.com <cite>KJ StErOiDs posted [p:923591904] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote>But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again?</quote> The Electoral College.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/20/19 12:54:12 PM #5:	trump couldnt plan a slumber party --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923593256] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>trump couldnt plan a slumber party</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 06/20/19 1:04:10 PM #6:	Remember last year when Oakland's mayor said there were incoming ICE raids and Trump gave her shit for it and people wanted charges filed against her? I wonder what changed. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:923593699] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Remember last year when Oakland's mayor said there were incoming ICE raids and Trump gave her shit for it and people wanted charges filed against her? I wonder what changed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pionear 06/24/19 10:39:18 AM #7:	https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-trump/trump-delays-mass-deportation-raids-seeks-deal-with-democrats-idUSKCN1TN0H7 Well, it's delayed for now, so everybody has more time to prepare I guess <cite>pionear posted [p:923771052] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-trump/trump-delays-mass-deportation-raids-seeks-deal-with-democrats-idUSKCN1TN0H7 Well, it's delayed for now, so everybody has more time to prepare I guess</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 06/24/19 11:32:35 AM #8:	if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:923773009] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 11:56:48 AM #9:	GanonsSpirit posted... But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again? What will the left's excuse be when they lose nearly every state except NY, CA, and some other tiny states in the northeast again? <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923773931] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote>But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again?</quote> What will the left's excuse be when they lose nearly every state except NY, CA, and some other tiny states in the northeast again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 11:57:11 AM #10:	Oh yeah, that the electoral college is racist lol <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923773947] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Oh yeah, that the electoral college is racist lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TaKun782 06/24/19 12:06:39 PM #11:	So, this is good? Yay? Good. Illegal alliens? Bad. <cite>TaKun782 posted [p:923774359] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>So, this is good? Yay? Good. Illegal alliens? Bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CTLM 06/24/19 12:11:54 PM #12:	Lokarin posted... if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? Not enough room. There's only one in California <cite>CTLM posted [p:923774552] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> Not enough room. There's only one in California</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/24/19 12:13:09 PM #13:	CTLM posted... Lokarin posted... if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? Not enough room. There's only one in California one too many --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923774603] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>CTLM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> Not enough room. There's only one in California</quote> one too many</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broken_Zeus 06/24/19 1:17:43 PM #14:	Well, it's a MAGA alert that actually concerns Trump and it uses something other than Yahoo so.... good job? >_> Lokarin posted... if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? And have Mexico pay for it all! --- Gamefaqs cannot handle my #BrokenBrilliance <cite>Broken_Zeus posted [p:923777389] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Well, it's a MAGA alert that actually concerns Trump and it uses something other than Yahoo so.... good job? >_> <cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> And have Mexico pay for it all!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 06/24/19 1:19:38 PM #15:	Fine as long as no legal citizens are rounded up --- "Everyone attack." - The man in the back <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:923777464] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Fine as long as no legal citizens are rounded up</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 06/24/19 1:27:35 PM #16:	how dare someone want to catch criminals!!! --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:923777837] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>how dare someone want to catch criminals!!!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 1:31:13 PM #17:	Krazy_Kirby posted... how dare someone want to catch criminals!!! iLlEgAl ImMiGrAtIoN iSnT a CrImE <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923778001] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>how dare someone want to catch criminals!!!</quote> iLlEgAl ImMiGrAtIoN iSnT a CrImE</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/24/19 2:34:21 PM #18:	Krazy_Kirby posted... how dare someone want to catch criminals!!! Honestly if theyre refusing to work with or even communicate with immigration officials then deporting them makes sense --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923780909] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>how dare someone want to catch criminals!!!</quote> Honestly if theyre refusing to work with or even communicate with immigration officials then deporting them makes sense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 06/24/19 3:06:26 PM #19:	Broken_Zeus posted... Well, it's a MAGA alert that actually concerns Trump and it uses something other than Yahoo so.... good job? >_> Lokarin posted... if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? And have Mexico pay for it all! I'm legit asking - are they criminals or aren't they? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:923782229] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broken_Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Well, it's a MAGA alert that actually concerns Trump and it uses something other than Yahoo so.... good job? >_> <cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> And have Mexico pay for it all!</quote> I'm legit asking - are they criminals or aren't they?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CTLM 06/24/19 3:46:34 PM #20:	Mead posted... CTLM posted... Lokarin posted... if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons? Not enough room. There's only one in California one too many No, not enough. Save the taxpayers some money for once <cite>CTLM posted [p:923783959] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CTLM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>if they are actually illegal why not put them in for profit prisons?</quote> Not enough room. There's only one in California</quote> one too many</quote> No, not enough. Save the taxpayers some money for once</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/24/19 3:56:14 PM #21:	GanonsSpirit posted... But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again? Same as it was the first time - massive voter fraud, millions of phantom voters, dead people voting, busing in people from across the border. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923784390] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote>But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again?</quote> Same as it was the first time - massive voter fraud, millions of phantom voters, dead people voting, busing in people from across the border.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 4:13:13 PM #22:	darkknight109 posted... GanonsSpirit posted... But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again? Same as it was the first time - massive voter fraud, millions of phantom voters, dead people voting, busing in people from across the border. His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states. And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923785129] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote>But what will his excuse be when he loses the popular vote by millions again?</quote> Same as it was the first time - massive voter fraud, millions of phantom voters, dead people voting, busing in people from across the border.</quote> His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states. And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 06/24/19 4:21:15 PM #23:	OhhhJa posted... His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states. And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time With fairness, they'll be foaming at the mouth in any case. All you need to do is tell them that men can't get pregnant and half of them will go mad... madder. --- Remember the "refugee" camps back in the Clinton and Obama era? Well Trump is the president so they're called concentration camps. -The honest left. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:923785509] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states. And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time</quote> With fairness, they'll be foaming at the mouth in any case. All you need to do is tell them that men can't get pregnant and half of them will go mad... madder.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/24/19 5:38:56 PM #24:	OhhhJa posted... His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states And by "overwhelmingly", you mean "by less of a margin than any president in the last 25 years not named George W. Bush." Anyways, his excuses were unnecessary because they were blatant lies, but Trump has a tissue-paper fragile ego, so it's not surprising he made them anyways. First time I've seen someone question the legitimacy of an election that they won. OhhhJa posted... And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time States don't vote, dude - people do. You don't live under a feudalistic government. The fact that 80% of the US by landmass voted for Trump means jack shit, because less than half of its population voted for him, which is what actually gives democratic governments their legitimacy. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923788695] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>His excuses were unnecessary anyway since he overwhelmingly won the states</quote> And by "overwhelmingly", you mean "by less of a margin than any president in the last 25 years not named George W. Bush." Anyways, his excuses were unnecessary because they were blatant lies, but Trump has a tissue-paper fragile ego, so it's not surprising he made them anyways. First time I've seen someone question the legitimacy of an election that they won. <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>And the left will probably be even more psychotic with foam dripping from their mouths again if trump wins 3/4ths of the states like last time </quote> States don't vote, dude - people do. You don't live under a feudalistic government. The fact that 80% of the US by landmass voted for Trump means jack shit, because less than half of its population voted for him, which is what actually gives democratic governments their legitimacy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 5:42:39 PM #25:	darkknight109 posted... democratic governments Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923788851] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>democratic governments</quote> Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 06/24/19 6:03:36 PM #26:	OhhhJa posted... Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win. --- Remember the "refugee" camps back in the Clinton and Obama era? Well Trump is the president so they're called concentration camps. -The honest left. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:923789823] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy</quote> Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/24/19 6:08:50 PM #27:	The_tall_midget posted... OhhhJa posted... Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win. Oh yeah, trump could've won under any system and that system would've been labeled historically racist afterward <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923790058] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy</quote> Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win.</quote> Oh yeah, trump could've won under any system and that system would've been labeled historically racist afterward</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/24/19 11:39:52 PM #28:	OhhhJa posted... Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy Which changes absolutely nothing about my argument. Representative democracies still garner their legitimacy from the people. The_tall_midget posted... Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win. Yeah, only horrible people complain about the electoral college. Like this asshole: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/266038556504494082?lang=en (it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not) --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923803954] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Ahh see this is where your confusion begins. The US is a representative democracy amd not a pure democracy</quote> Which changes absolutely nothing about my argument. Representative democracies still garner their legitimacy from the people. <cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>Don't worry. Regressives are offended at any system which doesn't allow them to win.</quote> Yeah, only horrible people complain about the electoral college. Like this asshole: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/266038556504494082?lang=en (it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 06/25/19 11:37:46 AM #29:	darkknight109 posted... (it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not) Damn conservatives --- "Everyone attack." - The man in the back <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:923821321] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>(it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not)</quote> Damn conservatives </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CTLM 06/25/19 11:48:29 AM #30:	Bloodychess posted... darkknight109 posted... (it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not) Damn conservatives Same author though? Same website doesn't mean same author <cite>CTLM posted [p:923821800] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bloodychess posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>(it's almost like conservatives completely switch their opinions depending on whether their side is winning or not)</quote> Damn conservatives </quote> Same author though? Same website doesn't mean same author</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/25/19 12:32:00 PM #31:	darkknight109 posted... Which changes absolutely nothing about my argument. Representative democracies still garner their legitimacy from the people. And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923823727] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Which changes absolutely nothing about my argument. Representative democracies still garner their legitimacy from the people.</quote> And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/25/19 12:47:21 PM #32:	OhhhJa posted... And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing Still doesn't change the fact that states don't vote; people do. The electoral college isn't based on number of states or landmass or any other such nonsense - it's based primarily on how many people those states contain. Saying "Trump won 3/4 of the states" is, in addition to being factually wrong, a completely meaningless sentence. You could win 3/4 of the states and still lose the election. Just 11 states - California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey - have exactly 270 electoral votes between them, which is enough to eke out a win. And the entire reason for that is because those states are populous and the people are the ones who are supposed to decide who runs things. It doesn't even give you an indication of how many people voted for a candidate, since saying "you won a state" doesn't indicate by how much. In a hypothetical "perfect" election, you could win office with as little as 22% of the votes (discounting third parties and tie breakers, both of which drop the margin even farther). The fact that I, a foreigner, actually have to explain this to Americans is kind of sad... --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923824483] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing </quote> Still doesn't change the fact that states don't vote; people do. The electoral college isn't based on number of states or landmass or any other such nonsense - it's based primarily on how many people those states contain. Saying "Trump won 3/4 of the states" is, in addition to being factually wrong, a completely meaningless sentence. You could win 3/4 of the states and still lose the election. Just 11 states - California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey - have exactly 270 electoral votes between them, which is enough to eke out a win. And the entire reason for that is because those states are populous and the people are the ones who are supposed to decide who runs things. It doesn't even give you an indication of how many people voted for a candidate, since saying "you won a state" doesn't indicate by how much. In a hypothetical "perfect" election, you could win office with as little as 22% of the votes (discounting third parties and tie breakers, both of which drop the margin even farther). The fact that I, a foreigner, actually have to explain this to Americans is kind of sad...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/25/19 12:52:29 PM #33:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing Still doesn't change the fact that states don't vote; people do. The electoral college isn't based on number of states or landmass or any other such nonsense - it's based primarily on how many people those states contain. Saying "Trump won 3/4 of the states" is, in addition to being factually wrong, a completely meaningless sentence. You could win 3/4 of the states and still lose the election. Just 11 states - California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey - have exactly 270 electoral votes between them, which is enough to eke out a win. It doesn't even give you an indication of how many people voted for a candidate, since saying "you won a state" doesn't indicate by how much. In a hypothetical "perfect" election, you could win office with as little as 22% of the votes (discounting third parties and tie breakers, both of which drop the margin even farther). The fact that I, a foreigner, actually have to explain this to Americans is kind of sad... The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923824715] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>And you still seem to have zero understanding of the electoral college and the fact that candidates do in fact win and lose states. That's why we have the whole red and blue state thing </quote> Still doesn't change the fact that states don't vote; people do. The electoral college isn't based on number of states or landmass or any other such nonsense - it's based primarily on how many people those states contain. Saying "Trump won 3/4 of the states" is, in addition to being factually wrong, a completely meaningless sentence. You could win 3/4 of the states and still lose the election. Just 11 states - California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey - have exactly 270 electoral votes between them, which is enough to eke out a win. It doesn't even give you an indication of how many people voted for a candidate, since saying "you won a state" doesn't indicate by how much. In a hypothetical "perfect" election, you could win office with as little as 22% of the votes (discounting third parties and tie breakers, both of which drop the margin even farther). The fact that I, a foreigner, actually have to explain this to Americans is kind of sad...</quote> The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/25/19 12:55:59 PM #34:	OhhhJa posted... The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence I'm sorry, I didn't mean to intimidate you. You always seem to bring up my intelligence whenever you wind up on the wrong end of one of these arguments. As a reminder, you were the one who brought up that Trump "overwhelmingly won the states" and that he won 3/4 of the states (which, once again, is objectively incorrect). Don't get upset when I explain to you why those are vacuous statements that don't actually mean anything for Trump and the Republicans. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923824873] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence</quote> I'm sorry, I didn't mean to intimidate you. You always seem to bring up my intelligence whenever you wind up on the wrong end of one of these arguments. As a reminder, you were the one who brought up that Trump "overwhelmingly won the states" and that he won 3/4 of the states (which, once again, is objectively incorrect). Don't get upset when I explain to you why those are vacuous statements that don't actually mean anything for Trump and the Republicans.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/25/19 1:13:25 PM #35:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence I'm sorry, I didn't mean to intimidate you. You always seem to bring up my intelligence whenever you wind up on the wrong end of one of these arguments. As a reminder, you were the one who brought up that Trump "overwhelmingly won the states" and that he won 3/4 of the states (which, once again, is objectively incorrect). Don't get upset when I explain to you why those are vacuous statements that don't actually mean anything for Trump and the Republicans. How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923825707] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>The fact that you actually wasted your time explaining something that I and pretty much every american already understands is a testament to how self righteous (typical canadian) you are. You literally still didnt dispute what I'm saying. You're just trying to misdirect instead of forfeiting because you overestimate your own intelligence</quote> I'm sorry, I didn't mean to intimidate you. You always seem to bring up my intelligence whenever you wind up on the wrong end of one of these arguments. As a reminder, you were the one who brought up that Trump "overwhelmingly won the states" and that he won 3/4 of the states (which, once again, is objectively incorrect). Don't get upset when I explain to you why those are vacuous statements that don't actually mean anything for Trump and the Republicans.</quote> How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/25/19 1:18:23 PM #36:	OhhhJa posted... How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means You're grasping at straws here. When did I ever say that the US had direct representation? All I did was correct you when you suggested that Trump won "3/4 of the states", as though that meant anything. Again, if states were all that mattered, Trump's victory would have been a landslide; here in the real world, he lost the popular vote and barely scraped out a win in what was easily the narrowest margin of victory in any presidential election of the last 50 years that didn't include George W. Bush. The number of states you win doesn't matter - how many electoral college votes those states have matters. Hence why you can win a majority of the states and still lose the election handily. Again, this isn't rocket science and I shouldn't have to explain to you why your earlier comment was completely facile. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923825933] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means</quote> You're grasping at straws here. When did I ever say that the US had direct representation? All I did was correct you when you suggested that Trump won "3/4 of the states", as though that meant anything. Again, if states were all that mattered, Trump's victory would have been a landslide; here in the real world, he lost the popular vote and barely scraped out a win in what was easily the narrowest margin of victory in any presidential election of the last 50 years that didn't include George W. Bush. The number of states you win doesn't matter - how many electoral college votes those states have matters. Hence why you can win a majority of the states and still lose the election handily. Again, this isn't rocket science and I shouldn't have to explain to you why your earlier comment was completely facile.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/25/19 2:32:03 PM #37:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means You're grasping at straws here. When did I ever say that the US had direct representation? All I did was correct you when you suggested that Trump won "3/4 of the states", as though that meant anything. Again, if states were all that mattered, Trump's victory would have been a landslide; here in the real world, he lost the popular vote and barely scraped out a win in what was easily the narrowest margin of victory in any presidential election of the last 50 years that didn't include George W. Bush. The number of states you win doesn't matter - how many electoral college votes those states have matters. Hence why you can win a majority of the states and still lose the election handily. Again, this isn't rocket science and I shouldn't have to explain to you why your earlier comment was completely facile. Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well . Keep arguing about nothing because you're upset that trump won by a landslide though if it makes you feel better <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923829399] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>How are you still failing to realize that if the electoral college purely represented the people that trump would've lost because of the popular vote. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Lol A state can be split pretty evenly yet one candidate gets all the electoral votes for that state. That's not directly representative of the all the people by any means</quote> You're grasping at straws here. When did I ever say that the US had direct representation? All I did was correct you when you suggested that Trump won "3/4 of the states", as though that meant anything. Again, if states were all that mattered, Trump's victory would have been a landslide; here in the real world, he lost the popular vote and barely scraped out a win in what was easily the narrowest margin of victory in any presidential election of the last 50 years that didn't include George W. Bush. The number of states you win doesn't matter - how many electoral college votes those states have matters. Hence why you can win a majority of the states and still lose the election handily. Again, this isn't rocket science and I shouldn't have to explain to you why your earlier comment was completely facile.</quote> Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well . Keep arguing about nothing because you're upset that trump won by a landslide though if it makes you feel better</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/25/19 5:16:34 PM #38:	OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923837028] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkKirby2500 06/25/19 5:16:54 PM #39:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyxSZhushjU" data-time=" --- The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him. Those who seek justice are at the greatest risk of losing sight of it. <cite>DarkKirby2500 posted [p:923837043] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyxSZhushjU" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 06/25/19 5:25:36 PM #40:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:923837392] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/25/19 5:39:27 PM #41:	OhhhJa posted... darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point You think you feel bad, try imagining what it's like from my perspective. I'm stuck trying to explain grade school-level math to a guy who's convinced he's the brightest bulb in the drawer. Seriously, do you not understand how math works? 304 votes for Trump + 227 for Clinton + 7 faithless electors = 538 votes total. 304/538 is not 74%. - it's 57%. Your 74% figure appears to come from dividing Clinton's votes by Trump's, which is just a hilarious mangling of math. That means that Clinton's vote count was 74% of Trump's, not that Trump's was 74% of the overall total. @OhhhJa --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923837992] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point</quote> You think you feel bad, try imagining what it's like from my perspective. I'm stuck trying to explain grade school-level math to a guy who's convinced he's the brightest bulb in the drawer. Seriously, do you not understand how math works? 304 votes for Trump + 227 for Clinton + 7 faithless electors = 538 votes total. 304/538 is not 74%. - it's 57%. Your 74% figure appears to come from dividing Clinton's votes by Trump's, which is just a hilarious mangling of math. That means that Clinton's vote count was 74% of Trump's, not that Trump's was 74% of the overall total. @OhhhJa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 06/25/19 9:19:29 PM #42:	Noooo! Please don't remove the criminals from America, the democrats need their illegal votes! --- The entire Democratic 2020 platform: Free money for criminals and irresponsible morons. Orange man bad. Vote for us. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:923847576] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Noooo! Please don't remove the criminals from America, the democrats need their illegal votes!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 06/25/19 9:25:22 PM #43:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process --- "Everyone attack." - The man in the back <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:923847894] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/25/19 9:54:11 PM #44:	Bloodychess posted... darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process You cant actually believe this --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923849219] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bloodychess posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process </quote> You cant actually believe this</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CTLM 06/25/19 10:33:16 PM #45:	Mead posted... Bloodychess posted... darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process You cant actually believe this Hillary led in popular votes the very next day 59,059,121 votes to Trumps 58,935,231. It was not 2 weeks later. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/08/presidential-election-updates-trump-clinton-news <cite>CTLM posted [p:923850878] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bloodychess posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> Trump had the majority vote when election night ended. Then California had two weeks of absentee votes to process </quote> You cant actually believe this</quote> Hillary led in popular votes the very next day 59,059,121 votes to Trumps 58,935,231. It was not 2 weeks later. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/08/presidential-election-updates-trump-clinton-news</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/26/19 1:51:52 AM #46:	The_tall_midget posted... Noooo! Please don't remove the criminals from America, the democrats need their illegal votes! This is your regular reminder that Democrat and Republican election monitors in all states have affirmed that there was no widespread voter fraud in the 2016 election and the only widespread fraud operation identified in recent years was carried out by Republicans in North Carolina. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923857170] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>Noooo! Please don't remove the criminals from America, the democrats need their illegal votes!</quote> This is your regular reminder that Democrat and Republican election monitors in all states have affirmed that there was no widespread voter fraud in the 2016 election and the only widespread fraud operation identified in recent years was carried out by Republicans in North Carolina.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/26/19 1:10:12 PM #47:	darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... darkknight109 posted... OhhhJa posted... Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow. It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point You think you feel bad, try imagining what it's like from my perspective. I'm stuck trying to explain grade school-level math to a guy who's convinced he's the brightest bulb in the drawer. Seriously, do you not understand how math works? 304 votes for Trump + 227 for Clinton + 7 faithless electors = 538 votes total. 304/538 is not 74%. - it's 57%. Your 74% figure appears to come from dividing Clinton's votes by Trump's, which is just a hilarious mangling of math. That means that Clinton's vote count was 74% of Trump's, not that Trump's was 74% of the overall total. No response, @OhhhJa? You seemed pretty eager to argue before you started embarrassing yourself. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923874164] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Yet trump also got 74% of the electoral votes making it also 3/4ths overall as well</quote> Man, math's really not your strong suit, eh? I'm starting to see why you're so insecure about other people's intelligence. Donald Trump won 304 electoral college votes out of a total of 538. I'll go slowly through this next part: 304 divided by 538 times 100 is... 57%. While losing the popular vote by a greater margin than any successful presidential candidate in history. Such landslide. Much wow.</quote> It was 304 to 227. Damn dude keep digging that hole lmao @darkknight109 I feel bad. Like I'm just picking on you at this point</quote> You think you feel bad, try imagining what it's like from my perspective. I'm stuck trying to explain grade school-level math to a guy who's convinced he's the brightest bulb in the drawer. Seriously, do you not understand how math works? 304 votes for Trump + 227 for Clinton + 7 faithless electors = 538 votes total. 304/538 is not 74%. - it's 57%. Your 74% figure appears to come from dividing Clinton's votes by Trump's, which is just a hilarious mangling of math. That means that Clinton's vote count was 74% of Trump's, not that Trump's was 74% of the overall total.</quote> No response, @OhhhJa? You seemed pretty eager to argue before you started embarrassing yourself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/28/19 3:58:27 PM #48:	Still nothing, @OhhhJa ? I'd almost think you'd finally clued in to the fact that you made a phenomenally stupid mistake and were trying to abandon the topic in order to save face. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923978622] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Still nothing, @OhhhJa ? I'd almost think you'd finally clued in to the fact that you made a phenomenally stupid mistake and were trying to abandon the topic in order to save face.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 06/28/19 6:01:14 PM #49:	Maybe he's busy preparing the royal baggage. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:923983537] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Maybe he's busy preparing the royal baggage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 07/06/19 12:46:01 AM #50:	Life +1 --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:924305457] in MAGA Alert... [t:77805232]...</cite> <quote>Life +1</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > MAGA Alert: tRump plans Mass Immigration Raids Next Week (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > MAGA Alert: tRump plans Mass Immigration Raids Next Week