Poll of the Day > Man, cooking is just so much time and effort.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
LinkPizza 10/02/18 7:23:20 PM #52:	streamofthesky posted... It will always take more time to make food and clean up than it will to eat it. Not always. It depends on what you make and how much. streamofthesky posted... LinkPizza posted... I haven't read the entire topic, but I think you guys may be misunderstanding something. You keep mentioning how he said 10 minutes was too long. But it wasn't just that. He was comparing it to the time it took to eat it. It took only 30% on the time he spent making it to eat it. That's why he was complaining. It took 10 minutes to make something that he ate in half the time. Which is a little different than him complaining about cooking for 10 minutes. At least, that's how I see it. And it does feel like a waste if you spent more than double the time prepare something that you finished insanely fast. It will always take more time to make food and clean up than it will to eat it. So what? If he had instead driven to a breakfast place, ordered the same sandwich, waited for it to be made, then driven back home, how much total time would that have been? Seems like a better starting point for comparison. Depends. Some places already have some made. Or he could call a place a round the corner. So, it does depend on things like that. But if it was a place around the corner that made sandwiches somewhat quick, it might have been the better option. For some, at least... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:909847996] in Man, cooki... [t:77057232]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>It will always take more time to make food and clean up than it will to eat it.</quote> Not always. It depends on what you make and how much. <cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>I haven't read the entire topic, but I think you guys may be misunderstanding something. You keep mentioning how he said 10 minutes was too long. But it wasn't just that. He was comparing it to the time it took to eat it. It took only 30% on the time he spent making it to eat it. That's why he was complaining. It took 10 minutes to make something that he ate in half the time. Which is a little different than him complaining about cooking for 10 minutes. At least, that's how I see it. And it does feel like a waste if you spent more than double the time prepare something that you finished insanely fast.</quote> It will always take more time to make food and clean up than it will to eat it. So what? If he had instead driven to a breakfast place, ordered the same sandwich, waited for it to be made, then driven back home, how much total time would that have been? Seems like a better starting point for comparison.</quote> Depends. Some places already have some made. Or he could call a place a round the corner. So, it does depend on things like that. But if it was a place around the corner that made sandwiches somewhat quick, it might have been the better option. For some, at least...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doctor Foxx 10/02/18 7:41:36 PM #53:	It takes more time to produce practically all single use goods than to consume them That's not news Though I will say if you're not cooking meat to temperature, it's easy to cook things more quickly --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:909848960] in Man, cooki... [t:77057232]...</cite> <quote>It takes more time to produce practically all single use goods than to consume them That's not news Though I will say if you're not cooking meat to temperature, it's easy to cook things more quickly</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 10/02/18 8:13:09 PM #54:	Doctor Foxx posted... It takes more time to produce practically all single use goods than to consume them That's not news Though I will say if you're not cooking meat to temperature, it's easy to cook things more quickly Mostly. Maybe. But it depends on what you're cooking, how much, and stuff like that. Plus, Idk about everyone's eating habits. But I don't scarf down my food like I'm starving every time I eat. But maybe others do... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:909850728] in Man, cooki... [t:77057232]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote>It takes more time to produce practically all single use goods than to consume them That's not news Though I will say if you're not cooking meat to temperature, it's easy to cook things more quickly</quote> Mostly. Maybe. But it depends on what you're cooking, how much, and stuff like that. Plus, Idk about everyone's eating habits. But I don't scarf down my food like I'm starving every time I eat. But maybe others do...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Man, cooking is just so much time and effort. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Man, cooking is just so much time and effort.