Poll of the Day > 16 y/o White Kid who had his MAGA Hat Stolen BAITED people with RACIST Remarks!

(+) Yeah! (+)

The 16 y/o Brat and Trump Supporter Hunter Richard who had his red MAGA hat stolen by a 30 y/o hispanic bartender at Whataburger in Texas had actually made RACIST COMMENTS about "hanging blacks" and LYNCHING them before he was confronted by Kino Jiminez!!

He posted a video on his FB showing a man throwing a drink at him and taking his hat as it went viral and generated 2 million hits

Kino was arrested and charged with a felony theft and was fired at his job

Richard says Jiminez came up to his table with his friends while they were eating and pulled his hat off his head and grabbed a part of his hair and then threw ice water at him yelling "F*** the president. This is going to go great in my motherf***** fireplace, bitch"

A witness said that he was there with family and said that the 20 second story didn't tell the full story and that moments before the attack, Richard and his friends were making racist comments about HANGING BLACKS and DEPORTING them to Africa and about building the wall with Kino in full listening view.

The man and his family are now getting DEATH THREATS for coming out with that statement.

He said "They were talking about the 4th of July hanging black people from trees, that that would be the perfect party. Hopefully with Donald Trump within the next few years, we can celebrate a white country, a real country without blacks. Maybe we can deport them to Africa"

He said the teens had just watched THE PURGE 4, a dystopian horror where murder is legal for 12 hours and allow anyone ot break the law and said they hoped it became a reality so they can kill them "blacks and latinos"

Richard is now getting his 15 minutes of fame with conservative as Donald Trump JR said he deserves his hat SIGNED by the President and to start a donation page for him.

Do you think this kid is someone who could say all of that?.

Kino - Arrested

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/06/14/4DF9F65600000578-5925687-image-m-3_1530885151515.jpg

Richard - Faking Racist

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/05/4E002C8000000578-0-image-a-72_1530937530078.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/05/4E002C7C00000578-0-image-a-73_1530937532438.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/05/4E002C7000000578-0-The_boys_said_Jimenez_attacked_them_without_any_provocation-m-75_1530937577480.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/05/17/4DF4402C00000578-5921257-image-a-36_1530808616547.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/05/4DFA040000000578-0-Richard_is_seen_kitted_out_with_other_MAGA_gear_in_a_photo_from_-a-77_1530937655559.jpg

Stoned Friend -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/06/15/4DF333B200000578-5925687-Shocked_The_teens_at_the_table_looked_frightened_when_the_patron-a-13_1530887362438.jpg
---

If thats true fuck that guy

said awful things then made that guy loose his job and get arrested

If he did say those things, then he got what he deserved.
---

Full Throttle posted...

listening view

Deport ducky back to Daily Mail.

Also he looks fucking pathetic, idk if it's worth taking such a weedy POS seriously.
---

Life imitating art from a movie? Yeah...im pretty sure this shit already happens in real life. But less toned down and stuff...

You refer to him as a "faking teen", which means you question the legitimacy of his display? I question it, because intelligent people don't do what you've just described. But trolls do. Somebody get this kid outta here and make Whataburger great again.
---

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.
---

I call complete bullshit that this actually happened. Just somebody pissed off about the hat some more.
---

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate
---

Full Throttle posted...

...in full listening view.

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

@Zeus, what do you think?

good thing theres a totally unverifiable eyewitness account to perfectly justify the shit behavior caught on video lol

this reeks of bullshit and everyone knows it lol

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

Look at this gal defending the unilateral application of violence to resolve verbal disagreement
---

Zeus posted...

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

Look at this gal defending the unilateral application of violence to resolve verbal disagreement

The witnesses receiving death threats sure agree violence is not acceptable. That's why those people facing that the threat of violence to suppress facts and context (showing this was far from unprovoked assault) is unacceptable. Though I don't hear you saying anything about that aspect
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

The witnesses receiving death threats sure agree violence is not acceptable. That's why those people facing that the threat of violence to suppress facts and context (showing this was far from unprovoked assault) is unacceptable. Though I don't hear you saying anything about that aspect

It didn't happen anyway since.
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

Look at this gal defending the unilateral application of violence to resolve verbal disagreement

The witnesses receiving death threats sure agree violence is not acceptable. That's why those people facing that the threat of violence to suppress facts and context (showing this was far from unprovoked assault) is unacceptable. Though I don't hear you saying anything about that aspect

Overlooking that you don't seem to understand that actual violence is worse than the threat of violence, we don't have people in this topic defending the use of threats -- unlike certain individuals sociopathically cheering on the use of violence when they dislike what somebody says (although I wonder if they'd be so enthusiastic if their right to speech was silenced by somebody else's violence...) or, in this case, allegedly said -- so it's universally understood as being condemned... although, I should point out, that threats made against *my* person were less than universally condemned on this board. Maybe you could talk about that.

Doctor Foxx posted...

(showing this was far from unprovoked assault)

...except even WITH the claims -- which, again, are probably bullshit -- it's *still* an unprovoked assault. Or do you not understand how provoking an assault actually works? Somebody having a conversation among themselves is a far cry from walking up to somebody and picking a fight. If I walked past a guy shouting that anybody who didn't vote for Hillary should be put to death (which, by the way, is more than he was alleged to have done), I don't have license to hit him. And it's scary that you don't seem to understand that (or, at least, that you very selectively understand that -- in that if it's violence to suppress speech you dislike, it's good).
---

Whatever was said, he was a kid. The other guy was an adult and shouldn't have assaulted and robbed him.

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

He's not wrong, though.
---

Krow_Incarnate posted...

Doctor Foxx posted...

Zeus posted...

Not for nothing, but "He said something racist!" seems to be the go-to defense for any act of aggression. And, unlike other alleged provocations, people either willingly or tacitly accept the claim as a justification for unjustifiable acts. You don't get to put your hands on people because you don't like something they said is shit most people learn by kindergarten.

Even if the guy actually said what he did (which seems unlikely but who knows), the person who chose to initiate violence deserves the repercussions resulting from that use of violence. However, I don't expect he'll see much in the way of repercussions since the courts will probably give him a slap on the wrist and virtue-signalling employers would happily hire him.

Look at this guy defending this racist hate

He's not wrong, though.

Well he's really only right about it not having actually been said.
---