Poll of the Day > These 3 CONSERVATIVE Girls are fighting for MEN'S RIGHTS..by STRIPPING!!!

Topic List
Page List: 1
mrduckbear
10/17/17 9:59:58 PM
#1:


Do you find these skanks "Hot"?



3 Heifers led by the biggest Bull herself, 22 y/o Vanessa Lussier are 3 conservative girls fighting for MEN'S RIGHTS while opposing the millions of feminists around the world defending their rights!!

They call themselves the "Lovely Ladies For Men's Issues" activist group who want to bring awareness to men's issues...by STRIPPING off for a "sexy calendar" if you want to call it that

Vanessa says "It's kind of unheard of that women support men's issues. While historically men have had more authority in the society, no society is perfect. And now that women have basically all their rights, and you see how men are for example, way more likely to be sentenced for a crime and much more harshly, you have to think men have issues too. So why can't we talk about that? Feminism is CANCER"

Vanessa, along with Reading Wren and Becky Quinton plan to get the conversation rolling by posing in skimpy outfits for a "Men's Issues 2018" calendar which will also feature facts about men.

Reading said "I think the sexy calendar format is a more playful way of getting people to notice some of the issues that are going on. To me, the most important issue really is paternal rights and what happens to men in family court"

They also plan to donate proceeds to charity such as ones that train Army Veterans in high-demand careers

A Gofundme page for them also managed to raise 2552 smackers to fund their ugly calendars

They are only 3 though as they have not recruited any other women that will fight for "men's rights".

Reading says "I'm married. i have kids and i want my kids to grow up in the world that if a relationship breaks down, they won't get screwed over just because their mother's rights come first"

They also want to fight issues such as male circumcision.

Vanessa says "To me, feminism is a good idea that got atken advantage of by bad people. I believe the biggest disruptors to men's rights are anybody who pushes myths and stereotypes men as toxic masculinity. When i realized that feminists were actually pushing views that hramed men, it made me getting involved. Milo Yiannopolous was right when he said Feminism was CANCER"

Vanessa said this started when she was in high school where she witnessed former friends becoming entrenched with feminism and became hostile to men

Do you find these conservative heifers Hot? let's see what people will vote

Conservative Girls fighting for Men -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/15/4569AD7400000578-4988922-image-m-19_1508251936073.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/15/4569AD5A00000578-4988922-image-m-20_1508251962070.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/16/4569AF9800000578-4988922-image-m-25_1508252997300.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/16/4569AD7F00000578-4988922-image-m-26_1508253100853.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/16/4569AD6C00000578-4988922-image-m-21_1508252544013.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/16/4569AD6800000578-4988922-image-m-23_1508252711042.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/17/16/4569AE4B00000578-4988922-image-m-30_1508253548490.jpg
---
Every time a Gamefaqs User PROVES they Stepped on a Bug, i will STOP Posting for 24 Hours...Beware, this is NOT a good thing to do!!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Metal_Mario99
10/17/17 10:01:57 PM
#2:


You have no right to slut shame these young women.
---
The GameFAQs mods are terrible at their job.
... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25
10/17/17 10:13:40 PM
#3:


I'd bang all three. Preferably at the same time.
---
One who knows nothing can understand nothing.
http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - http://i.imgur.com/kDysIcd.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
Broken_Zeus
10/17/17 10:21:12 PM
#4:


mrduckbear posted...
3 Heifers led by the biggest Bull herself, 22 y/o Vanessa Lussier are 3 conservative girls fighting for MEN'S RIGHTS while opposing the millions of feminists around the world defending their rights!!


lolwut? Not how it works. Especially when they're pushing for issues, like domestic violence shelters for men, which don't even affect women in the first place unless you're arguing that any money spent on a men's shelter should instead go to women because men should have no support network... which actually sums up modern feminism which is about superiority and privilege rather than equality.

mrduckbear posted...
Do you find these conservative heifers Hot?


No, they're all very overweight.
---
Gamefaqs cannot handle my #BrokenBrilliance
... Copied to Clipboard!
DocDelicious
10/17/17 10:47:46 PM
#5:


Metal_Mario99 posted...
You have no right to slut shame these young women.

Yeah, but fat shaming is ok. And they are certainly that.
---
o7
Let strength be granted so the world might be mended.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DistantMemory
10/17/17 10:51:52 PM
#6:


I find the one on the left super attractive between that bod and that face.
... Copied to Clipboard!
slacker03150
10/17/17 11:25:41 PM
#7:


They are not bad, but between the stretch marks and the tattoos it's a little much for me.
---
I am awesome and so are you.
Lenny gone but not forgotten. - 12/10/2015
... Copied to Clipboard!
IceDragon77
10/17/17 11:43:27 PM
#8:


PotD standards: 0/10

But everyone one on this site would probably hit any of them because 99% of the people here are loser virgins. lol
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SusanGreenEyes
10/18/17 12:57:48 AM
#9:


Are they getting paid to put their clothes back on?
---
Been a murder, over in Riften. Some old lady who runs an orphanage. Those poor children must be heartbroken.
... Copied to Clipboard!
AC_Dragonfire
10/18/17 2:55:12 AM
#10:


IceDragon77 posted...
PotD standards: 0/10

But everyone one on this site would probably hit any of them because 99% of the people here are loser virgins. lol

People are having less sex these days. It's just a fact of modern life in the 21st century.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 3:00:58 AM
#11:


Who would pay to look at that? Gross.

mrduckbear posted...
Milo Yiannopolous was right

Nope.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus
10/18/17 3:03:05 AM
#12:


IceDragon77 posted...
PotD standards: 0/10

But everyone one on this site would probably hit any of them because [...]


Given that they're crazy fat and unattractive, it'd be like arguing that straight guys would go after guys simply because they're horny. Attraction doesn't usually work that way. Granted, some guys are into heavier women so they could be attracted rather than repulsed.

SusanGreenEyes posted...
Are they getting paid to put their clothes back on?


O snap!
---
(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash
... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys
10/18/17 3:12:06 AM
#13:


wwinterj25 posted...
I'd bang all three. Preferably at the same time.
... Copied to Clipboard!
LtCommanderData
10/18/17 3:13:45 AM
#14:


IceDragon77 posted...
But everyone one on this site would probably hit any of them because 99% of the people here are loser virgins.


Stop projecting
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kislevic
10/18/17 5:22:07 AM
#15:


Can the mods please ban this guy and fullthrottle
---
"They'll outlive your cowardice trolling and main account" ~ Universquall
... Copied to Clipboard!
Alexandra_Trent
10/18/17 5:43:38 AM
#16:


Please make them put their clothes back on.
---
"Ladies don't start fights, but they can finish them." -Marie, Aristocats
... Copied to Clipboard!
dainkinkaide
10/18/17 5:53:13 AM
#17:


These women are woefully ignorant, and need to learn what the terms they're disparaging actually mean, thereby learning the implications thereof.

To wit, toxic masculinity is probably more harmful to men than it is to women.
---
Hank Pym changes superhero aliases more often than Hawkman changes origin stories.
... Copied to Clipboard!
LtCommanderData
10/18/17 6:01:28 AM
#18:


dainkinkaide posted...
To wit, toxic masculinity is probably more harmful to men than it is to women.


The concept is good, but it is so poorly named that I am pretty sure it was designed solely to be as inflammatory as possible especially given that the feminine version of the concept does not have an overly inflammatory name.
... Copied to Clipboard!
dainkinkaide
10/18/17 6:10:36 AM
#19:


LtCommanderData posted...
dainkinkaide posted...
To wit, toxic masculinity is probably more harmful to men than it is to women.


The concept is good, but it is so poorly named that I am pretty sure it was designed solely to be as inflammatory as possible especially given that the feminine version of the concept does not have an overly inflammatory name.

It's excellently named. It concisely states that there is a societal ideal of manliness (i.e. masculinity) that seems benign or neutral in small doses, but grossly harmful when taken as a whole (i.e. toxic). It's decidedly not saying "men are bad", as it's not called "toxic maleness", and "masculinity" and "maleness" are two different things.
---
Hank Pym changes superhero aliases more often than Hawkman changes origin stories.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Final Fantasy2389
10/18/17 6:11:01 AM
#20:


Kislevic posted...
Can the mods please ban this guy and fullthrottle

Shh newbie. Shhh.

Alexandra_Trent posted...
Please make them put their clothes back on.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
LtCommanderData
10/18/17 6:14:30 AM
#21:


dainkinkaide posted...
It's decidedly not saying "men are bad"


And yet that is the impression it gives to literally everyone who sees it. You have to go through the exact spiel you just did in order to inform them of what it truly means. It is not a self-evidently informative name and the first reaction most people have to it is "that is inflammatory". It is a bad name and the fact that people fight so vehemently against "toxic femininity" in terms of both the existence of the concept and the name itself that I honestly believe toxic masculinity is an intentionally manipulative term.

I am will to accept the possibility that it was named in order to spur conversation and not to insult, but that is probably the best case scenario.
... Copied to Clipboard!
dainkinkaide
10/18/17 7:11:35 AM
#22:


LtCommanderData posted...
And yet that is the impression it gives to literally everyone who sees it. You have to go through the exact spiel you just did in order to inform them of what it truly means. It is not a self-evidently informative name and the first reaction most people have to it is "that is inflammatory".

Then maybe native English speakers should fucking learn what words mean. "Masculinity" doesn't mean "the state of being male"; it means "manliness", i.e. a cultural ideal of what a man "should" be or strive towards. This is pretty basic semantics.

Actually, the fact that "masculinity" apparently equates to "maleness" in their minds is, itself, probably a product of toxic masculinity.
---
Hank Pym changes superhero aliases more often than Hawkman changes origin stories.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 7:28:21 AM
#23:


dainkinkaide posted...
the fact that "masculinity" apparently equates to "maleness" in their minds is, itself, probably a product of toxic masculinity.

dainkinkaide posted...
it means "manliness", i.e. a cultural ideal of what a man "should" be

How a man should be is inherently what a man is. Being male makes people behave in masculine ways, it's why it's called masculinity.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
OmegaTomHank
10/18/17 7:33:06 AM
#24:


How the fuck can you be fat and have no ass?

Good god.

I might bang the one with the blue tattoo on the far right especially if Im on a spell like I am irl right now where Im just ridiculously horny
... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop
10/18/17 8:11:56 AM
#25:


DocDelicious posted...
Metal_Mario99 posted...
You have no right to slut shame these young women.

Yeah, but fat shaming is ok. And they are certainly that.


Have you ever seen a picture of duckbear? He has absolutely no room to talk. Aside from being a far left, sensationalist, CNN fake news, click baitey, piece of devisive refuse, he is also a bit of a heifer.

I seriously cannot think of a single redeeming quality in you duckbear.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop
10/18/17 8:14:53 AM
#26:


Zeus posted...
it'd be like arguing that straight guys would go after guys simply because they're horny. Attraction doesn't usually work that way.


So, you've never heard of a bromance?
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 8:23:24 AM
#27:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
How a man should be is inherently what a man is.


So you would say that every man is the way that a man should be?
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 8:37:29 AM
#28:


adjl posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
How a man should be is inherently what a man is.


So you would say that every man is the way that a man should be?

I think they all have elements of the ideal. We live in feminist times so many men have been shutdown and indoctrinated in to believing their instincts are wrong, evil and unnatural.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
thecolorgreen
10/18/17 8:41:00 AM
#29:


I would rather be opressed and they keep their clothes on
---
:wq
... Copied to Clipboard!
Baardmeester
10/18/17 8:45:46 AM
#30:


-aposematism hair
check

-tattoo's
check

-piercings
check

-skimpy clothing
check

How the hell do people think these girls are conservative?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Jiggy101011
10/18/17 8:58:26 AM
#31:


I'm confused as to why they are "sluts". Did they all bang the photographer afterwards or something?
---
Gamertag: F1RE v2 PSN ID: F1REx
Man got me a 9 and she sexy.
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 9:29:42 AM
#32:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
We live in feminist times so many men have been shutdown and indoctrinated in to believing their instincts are wrong, evil and unnatural.


Oh really? Do go on. I'd be thrilled to hear which important instincts you feel are being repressed by the feminist bogeywoman.
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 9:29:43 AM
#33:


Jiggy101011 posted...
I'm confused as to why they are "sluts". Did they all bang the photographer afterwards or something?

Because they think taking off their clothes will help men's rights when, if anything, it'll turn moderate feminists away from the cause.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 9:32:32 AM
#34:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
Jiggy101011 posted...
I'm confused as to why they are "sluts". Did they all bang the photographer afterwards or something?

Because they think taking off their clothes will help men's rights when, if anything, it'll turn moderate feminists away from the cause.


That doesn't really answer the question.
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 9:34:38 AM
#35:


adjl posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
We live in feminist times so many men have been shutdown and indoctrinated in to believing their instincts are wrong, evil and unnatural.


Oh really? Do go on. I'd be thrilled to hear which important instincts you feel are being repressed by the feminist bogeywoman.

Aggressive competitiveness, solving small problems with arguing, settling disagreements with fights, all that good stuff. We don't live in times where it's appropriate to be manly.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 9:36:24 AM
#36:


adjl posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
Jiggy101011 posted...
I'm confused as to why they are "sluts". Did they all bang the photographer afterwards or something?

Because they think taking off their clothes will help men's rights when, if anything, it'll turn moderate feminists away from the cause.


That doesn't really answer the question.

They default to sex appeal when they have little to offer and it's damaging, anything else would be better but they want an excuse to get naked.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 9:45:23 AM
#37:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
They default to sex appeal when they have little to offer and it's damaging,


Okay, good answer. Carry on.

Kyuubi4269 posted...
Aggressive competitiveness, solving small problems with arguing, settling disagreements with fights, all that good stuff. We don't live in times where it's appropriate to be manly.


Uhh, small problems still are solved by arguing. Just not necessarily by screaming because, frankly, that's a considerable waste of energy. Same with fighting; you end up with a bunch of unnecessary injuries and energetic expenditure. Drifting away from that is a basic civility thing grounded in practical reality, not a feminist thing. Similarly, aggressive competitiveness (or any kind of aggression) tends to just result in more stress overall, which is unhealthy. It's not really better than being more chill, nor is healthy competitiveness really anything feminism is pushing against.
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/18/17 10:07:42 AM
#38:


adjl posted...
Uhh, small problems still are solved by arguing. Just not necessarily by screaming because, frankly, that's a considerable waste of energy. Same with fighting; you end up with a bunch of unnecessary injuries and energetic expenditure.

Shouting down the other person is establishing dominance, the person unwilling to take their point to conflict isn't as invested in their viewpoint so they lose, it settles the issue immediately instead of going through many long rounds of petty arguments.

Same with fighting, you settle a stalemate by dominating the other party, injuries sustained are from unwillingness to submit. Instead of accepting nothing's going to get done, the stronger party leads the group and keeps things moving.

adjl posted...
Drifting away from that is a basic civility thing grounded in practical reality, not a feminist thing.

Dueling is civil. Violence and bruises are not always a bad thing, but feminists are aware that they are on the back foot when it comes to enforcing demands (if someone is uncivil enough to physically challenge an unequal opponent) so fights are deemed deserving of several years of imprisonment (ironically by force).

adjl posted...
Similarly, aggressive competitiveness (or any kind of aggression) tends to just result in more stress overall, which is unhealthy.

It results in immediate results overwhelming the opponent minimising losses, but again, women are twice as susceptible to stress so that strategy is discouraged.

Men aren't supposed to be manly because women aren't as able to fight on that level. Men have an instinct for fighting but it's shut down before they're old enough to even understand themselves and it causes internal conflict.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
dainkinkaide
10/18/17 3:15:59 PM
#39:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
dainkinkaide posted...
the fact that "masculinity" apparently equates to "maleness" in their minds is, itself, probably a product of toxic masculinity.

dainkinkaide posted...
it means "manliness", i.e. a cultural ideal of what a man "should" be

How a man should be is inherently what a man is. Being male makes people behave in masculine ways, it's why it's called masculinity.

No, the two are separate, because the ideal of manliness can differ by culture.

The most manly Icelandic man is likely different from the most manly Gambian man. It's even possible for a woman to exhibit behavior and traits that are considered culturally "manly".

"Manliness" is not defined by one's primary or secondary sexual characteristics, but rather by one's behavior. Being male doesn't necessarily mean one is manly, and being manly doesn't necessarily mean one is male.
---
Hank Pym changes superhero aliases more often than Hawkman changes origin stories.
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 3:30:44 PM
#40:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
Shouting down the other person is establishing dominance, the person unwilling to take their point to conflict isn't as invested in their viewpoint so they lose, it settles the issue immediately instead of going through many long rounds of petty arguments.


Which doesn't actually solve problems. It just breeds resentment in the one that doesn't shout as loudly or fight as well, and victory in the argument has nothing to do with who actually has the better ideas. That's a terrible way to solve issues.

Maybe your ideal image of a man is too boneheaded and stupid to actually think and talk through conflicts, but personally, I have higher standards for myself and every other person on this planet. Caveman days are long past, and it's not just feminists that would say that. It's anyone with a modicum of common sense.
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Mover_of_Zigs
10/18/17 3:44:11 PM
#41:


Would smash.

But I wouldn't buy their calendar or associate with them outside of said smashing.
... Copied to Clipboard!
LtCommanderData
10/18/17 4:21:09 PM
#42:


dainkinkaide posted...
Then maybe native English speakers should fucking learn what words mean. "Masculinity" doesn't mean "the state of being male"; it means "manliness", i.e. a cultural ideal of what a man "should" be or strive towards. This is pretty basic semantics.


Yeah that is not accurate. Masculinity covers the societal as well as biologically-driven behavioral aspects attributed to being male. An attack on masculinity as a whole is necessarily an attack on maleness as a whole as some of these behaviors are biologically driven and not all of them are harmful. I know that is not what people mean when they say toxic masculinity, but it absolutely can correctly be interpreted that way if the term is presented with no associated definition.

So again I am back to the concept is sound the name is terrible. I am trying to think of ways that it could be improved. For starters it does not have to be so terse. Referring to it with something as simple as "the toxic aspects of masculinity" would be a huge improvement even if it is not perfect. Anything really to emphasize it is only targeting specific harmful behaviors and not the concept as a whole would go a long way to prevent the initial visceral reaction most people have.
... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl
10/18/17 8:37:20 PM
#43:


LtCommanderData posted...
An attack on masculinity as a whole


But it's not an attack on masculinity as a whole. Adjectives narrow concepts down to be more specific. Talking about "red apples" narrows down the subject/object to "apples that are red," not "all apples are red. Similarly, "toxic masculinity" narrows down the subject to the elements of masculinity that are toxic, and does not mean "all masculinity is toxic." The latter interpretation can only be generated with fairly specific context.
---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
PKMNsony
10/19/17 1:56:52 AM
#44:


Oh god, I'll vote for whatever you want me to, just cover yourselves up!
... Copied to Clipboard!
LtCommanderData
10/19/17 2:01:53 AM
#45:


adjl posted...
But it's not an attack on masculinity as a whole. Adjectives narrow concepts down to be more specific. Talking about "red apples" narrows down the subject/object to "apples that are red," not "all apples are red. Similarly, "toxic masculinity" narrows down the subject to the elements of masculinity that are toxic, and does not mean "all masculinity is toxic." The latter interpretation can only be generated with fairly specific context.


But, when a concept represents a subset of a larger whole an adjective can inform the entire subset. e.g. "despite their impressive stature, the Gauls were no match for the stout Romans". In this case the adjective, stout, does not describe all members of the superset, people, but does describe a quality of the average Roman projected on to that group as a whole. You are correct though in that requires context, but that is kind of my point. There is no reason to even allow for the negative, erroneous definition unless the negative reaction is by design.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1