Current Events > Define : pandering to the sjws?

Topic List	Page List: 1
epik_fail1 04/12/17 1:01:36 AM #1:	Define what it means please. --- Losing an argument? Ends it with but...but...Hillary and her emails! <cite>epik_fail1 posted [p:877028998] in Define : p... [t:75227778]...</cite> <quote>Define what it means please.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gamer99z 04/12/17 1:04:47 AM #2:	Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing. --- "You need to lay off the peanut-butthurt and u-jelly sandwiches" - Neon Octopus <cite>Gamer99z posted [p:877029116] in Define : p... [t:75227778]...</cite> <quote>Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
epik_fail1 04/12/17 1:08:56 AM #3:	Gamer99z posted... Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing. That is a fair definition, but why do people use it to refer to new characters? --- Losing an argument? Ends it with but...but...Hillary and her emails! <cite>epik_fail1 posted [p:877029273] in Define : p... [t:75227778]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gamer99z posted...</cite> <quote>Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing.</quote> That is a fair definition, but why do people use it to refer to new characters?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MARKINGRAM22 04/12/17 1:14:02 AM #4:	epik_fail1 posted... Gamer99z posted... Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing. That is a fair definition, but why do people use it to refer to new characters? I think it is also when they implement characters defined by their outward identity and use it primarily as a political mouthpiece. Good example is trans character in new mass effect and DA3. Also for a more ridiculous example look at that boulders gate game. --- "That man practices Islam. Are you happy he was taken out since according to you he believes what terrorists do?" -VipaGTS to me <cite>MARKINGRAM22 posted [p:877029454] in Define : p... [t:75227778]...</cite> <quote><cite>epik_fail1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Gamer99z posted...</cite> <quote>Doing things for the sake of it when it isn't necessary in any way or adds nothing to the characters/story. Things like changing the race, sex, sexual orientation of an established character for no reason or doing something completely unnecessary. Like if for some reason in the next Zelda game, within the story they were like "Link is gay". There's no reason for them to do that or give him sexuality in general because it's completely irrelevant to the story and the characters and adds nothing.</quote> That is a fair definition, but why do people use it to refer to new characters?</quote> I think it is also when they implement characters defined by their outward identity and use it primarily as a political mouthpiece. Good example is trans character in new mass effect and DA3. Also for a more ridiculous example look at that boulders gate game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
megATOMOS 04/12/17 1:14:12 AM #5:	--- http://i.imgur.com/8GzlC.gif <cite>megATOMOS posted [p:877029463] in Define : p... [t:75227778]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Define : pandering to the sjws? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Define : pandering to the sjws?