Current Events > Republicans just nuked the filibuster

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
3rd_Best_Master 04/06/17 4:54:20 PM #51:	Fart_Tzar posted... 3rd_Best_Master posted... How is comprise even a necessity now that the filibuster is gone? What's there to compromise when the minority party might as well not even be there? I'd make an argument saying in the long term getting rid of the weapon of shutting the gov't down is good, but it seems you would argue against it either way. It looks like we're done here. Seems like even you know your bulls* opinion is garbage when you need to make excuses just to keep it to yourself. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2 <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:876677349] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fart_Tzar posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted...</cite> <quote> How is comprise even a necessity now that the filibuster is gone? What's there to compromise when the minority party might as well not even be there? </quote> I'd make an argument saying in the long term getting rid of the weapon of shutting the gov't down is good, but it seems you would argue against it either way. It looks like we're done here.</quote> Seems like even you know your bulls* opinion is garbage when you need to make excuses just to keep it to yourself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 04/06/17 4:56:11 PM #52:	Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means. Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link. Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:876677468] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means.</quote> Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link.</quote> Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonAngeI 04/06/17 5:02:23 PM #53:	Republicans "Just change the rules when we can't get our way" --- Why am I here? <cite>CrimsonAngeI posted [p:876677862] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>Republicans "Just change the rules when we can't get our way"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 04/06/17 5:07:46 PM #54:	hollow_shrine posted... Color me surprised. 2018 can't come soon enough. We won't gain many seats even if more democrats go out and vote. It won't be until 2021 that the districts get redrawn and so it's down to us winning more 2018 and 2020 seats to get the majority so that over the next decade they'll have more fair districts. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:876678199] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote>Color me surprised. 2018 can't come soon enough.</quote> We won't gain many seats even if more democrats go out and vote. It won't be until 2021 that the districts get redrawn and so it's down to us winning more 2018 and 2020 seats to get the majority so that over the next decade they'll have more fair districts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 04/06/17 5:17:21 PM #55:	Mal_Fet posted... Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means. Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link. Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:876678804] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means.</quote> Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link.</quote> Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 04/06/17 5:17:42 PM #56:	gunplagirl posted... hollow_shrine posted... Color me surprised. 2018 can't come soon enough. We won't gain many seats even if more democrats go out and vote. It won't be until 2021 that the districts get redrawn and so it's down to us winning more 2018 and 2020 seats to get the majority so that over the next decade they'll have more fair districts. 2018's also a real bad year for Senate seats(for the Democrats), since it's the echo of 2006 and 2012. Like, Ted Cruz's seat is the third best pick-up opportunity. A reasonably popular incumbent senator in a red state. <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:876678823] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote>Color me surprised. 2018 can't come soon enough.</quote> We won't gain many seats even if more democrats go out and vote. It won't be until 2021 that the districts get redrawn and so it's down to us winning more 2018 and 2020 seats to get the majority so that over the next decade they'll have more fair districts.</quote> 2018's also a real bad year for Senate seats(for the Democrats), since it's the echo of 2006 and 2012. Like, Ted Cruz's seat is the third best pick-up opportunity. A reasonably popular incumbent senator in a red state.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 04/06/17 5:18:07 PM #57:	PiOverlord posted... Our freedoms are over. Gorsuch is good, but now we are going to get the worst Supreme Court in history with the following justices. Y'all might as well rip up this Constitution because it is as valuable as a piece of Toilet Paper now. It's amazing how each side says this when someone that doesn't bat for them fills a seat --- Knowledge is power, power corrupts. Study hard and become evil. <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:876678845] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>Our freedoms are over. Gorsuch is good, but now we are going to get the worst Supreme Court in history with the following justices. Y'all might as well rip up this Constitution because it is as valuable as a piece of Toilet Paper now.</quote> It's amazing how each side says this when someone that doesn't bat for them fills a seat</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/06/17 5:20:38 PM #58:	Mal_Fet posted... Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means. Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link. Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt). --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876679022] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>Just like the other day when you used the term circumstantial evidence without knowing what it means.</quote> Oh look, another lie. If it was just the other day, the topic must still be up, right? Give us the link.</quote> Hey @Kim_Kusanagi I'm still waiting for that link</quote> wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 04/06/17 5:21:41 PM #59:	CrimsonAngeI posted... Harry Reid "Just change the rules when we can't get our way" --- Oda break tracker 2017- 2 (1) Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:876679092] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonAngeI posted...</cite> <quote>Harry Reid "Just change the rules when we can't get our way"</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 04/06/17 5:23:19 PM #60:	This is the most bipartisan thing Congress has done in years. Dems killed the filibuster for lower courts in 2013 Repubs double-tapped the corpse for the supreme court now. What I wanna know is WHY can a rule that requires more than a simple majority to use be repealed with a simple majority? Who the hell missed that loophole in the early draft. Was it old Benny Franklin? That lush! --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:876679216] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>This is the most bipartisan thing Congress has done in years. Dems killed the filibuster for lower courts in 2013 Repubs double-tapped the corpse for the supreme court now. What I wanna know is WHY can a rule that requires more than a simple majority to use be repealed with a simple majority? Who the hell missed that loophole in the early draft. Was it old Benny Franklin? That lush!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 04/06/17 5:26:17 PM #61:	Kim Kusanagi posted... wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt). Lol ok bro. So what was the topic about --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:876679410] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt).</quote> Lol ok bro. So what was the topic about</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/06/17 5:29:06 PM #62:	Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt). Lol ok bro. So what was the topic about When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin and being investigated by FBI and you posted something about circumstantial evidence that was so completely against the definition that everyone in the thread laughed at you. --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876679592] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>wait, ill look into it. EDIT: I looked into my active messages and the topic already got purged (it was last week when you posted such idiocy with your laughable alt).</quote> Lol ok bro. So what was the topic about</quote> When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin and being investigated by FBI and you posted something about circumstantial evidence that was so completely against the definition that everyone in the thread laughed at you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 04/06/17 5:30:06 PM #63:	s0nicfan posted... What I wanna know is WHY can a rule that requires more than a simple majority to use be repealed with a simple majority? Who the hell missed that loophole in the early draft. Was it old Benny Franklin? That lush! The concept of filibuster is not in the constitution at all. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:876679652] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>What I wanna know is WHY can a rule that requires more than a simple majority to use be repealed with a simple majority? Who the hell missed that loophole in the early draft. Was it old Benny Franklin? That lush!</quote> The concept of filibuster is not in the constitution at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
garan 04/06/17 5:32:35 PM #64:	SideshowBob311 posted... If you don't like it, blame Harry Reid. After what he did in 2013, this was inevitable. You can't un-** that pig. Yep, Democrats shouldn't have bothered with the filibuster if they didn't want the Republicans to do this. <cite>garan posted [p:876679803] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>SideshowBob311 posted...</cite> <quote>If you don't like it, blame Harry Reid. After what he did in 2013, this was inevitable. You can't un-** that pig.</quote> Yep, Democrats shouldn't have bothered with the filibuster if they didn't want the Republicans to do this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 04/06/17 5:32:59 PM #65:	The filibuster was never a rule to begin with, just a mutually accepted gentleman's agreement about Senate procedure. There's also a ton of ways around it, an Democrats aren't exactly one to talk since they used budget reconciliation to weasel the ACA through the Senate's filibuster. To be fair, I can't remember the last time either party legitimately filibustered a Supreme Court nominee, so Democrats were kinda pushing their luck a bit by going that direction. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:876679832] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>The filibuster was never a rule to begin with, just a mutually accepted gentleman's agreement about Senate procedure. There's also a ton of ways around it, an Democrats aren't exactly one to talk since they used budget reconciliation to weasel the ACA through the Senate's filibuster. To be fair, I can't remember the last time either party legitimately filibustered a Supreme Court nominee, so Democrats were kinda pushing their luck a bit by going that direction.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 04/06/17 5:33:01 PM #66:	TheVipaGTS posted... Fart_Tzar posted... It's about time we got rid of the filibuster. Both sides have been bitching about it for years. Just because a republicans are getting rid of it, everyone getting all partisan politics up in here. No it's just calling out hypocrisy. Why didn't they try to get rid of it before? They had the opportunity to for awhile. They kept it because at the time it benefitted them. And you can say "but liberals would do it too!" And and they should be held to the same standards...but that isn't what happened here. Hold the ones who did it accountable. Don't say "they would have done it too!"...that just gives both sides more power to do shit like this. Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president. Fart_Tzar posted... We don't live in a perfect world. At least the fillibuster is going away. Take what positives you can from a situation. I'm not sure that's actually a plus. Coffeebeanz posted... The filibuster was never a rule to begin with, just a mutually accepted gentleman's agreement about Senate procedure. To be fair, I can't remember the last time either party legitimately filibustered a Supreme Court nominee, so Democrats were kinda pushing their luck a bit by going that direction. The only time in US history that it's happened was to GWB's nomination of Alito in 2006, which was back when the Dems were abusing the filibuster to obstruct Republicans. (Oh, supposedly it may have happened in some form to LBJ's nomination.) --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:876679834] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Fart_Tzar posted...</cite> <quote>It's about time we got rid of the filibuster. Both sides have been bitching about it for years. Just because a republicans are getting rid of it, everyone getting all partisan politics up in here.</quote> No it's just calling out hypocrisy. Why didn't they try to get rid of it before? They had the opportunity to for awhile. They kept it because at the time it benefitted them. And you can say "but liberals would do it too!" And and they should be held to the same standards...but that isn't what happened here. Hold the ones who did it accountable. Don't say "they would have done it too!"...that just gives both sides more power to do shit like this.</quote> Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president. <cite>Fart_Tzar posted...</cite> <quote>We don't live in a perfect world. At least the fillibuster is going away. Take what positives you can from a situation. </quote> I'm not sure that's actually a plus. <cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>The filibuster was never a rule to begin with, just a mutually accepted gentleman's agreement about Senate procedure. To be fair, I can't remember the last time either party legitimately filibustered a Supreme Court nominee, so Democrats were kinda pushing their luck a bit by going that direction.</quote> The only time in US history that it's happened was to GWB's nomination of Alito in 2006, which was back when the Dems were abusing the filibuster to obstruct Republicans. (Oh, supposedly it may have happened in some form to LBJ's nomination.)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 04/06/17 5:36:38 PM #67:	By legitimately filibuster, I mean successfully and permanently blocking a nominee. The Democrats actually failed their filibuster of Alito. Mostly because nobody has ever seriously attempted a literal filibuster of a nominee on the Senate floor in decades. The Senate has a constitutional obligation to confirm (or not confirm) a nominee, which has generally been interpreted as the Senate actually has to vote on a nominee, and a filibuster essentially violates that rule. The Republicans took advantage of their control of the Senate to delay Merrick Garland's nomination hearings until after the election. It would've eventually failed and just be a publicity stunt if Clinton had won. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:876680074] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>By legitimately filibuster, I mean successfully and permanently blocking a nominee. The Democrats actually failed their filibuster of Alito. Mostly because nobody has ever seriously attempted a literal filibuster of a nominee on the Senate floor in decades. The Senate has a constitutional obligation to confirm (or not confirm) a nominee, which has generally been interpreted as the Senate actually has to vote on a nominee, and a filibuster essentially violates that rule. The Republicans took advantage of their control of the Senate to delay Merrick Garland's nomination hearings until after the election. It would've eventually failed and just be a publicity stunt if Clinton had won.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/06/17 5:42:30 PM #68:	Zeus posted... Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president. Oh really --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876680474] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president.</quote> Oh really</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 04/06/17 5:43:52 PM #69:	Kim Kusanagi posted... Zeus posted... Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president. Oh really Not to mention one of the guys he filibustered wound up becoming Chief Justice and literally saved his healthcare bill from being ruled unconstitutional. If anything, Democrats owe the GOP a freebie. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:876680555] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Somebody forgets that the Democrats were the first party to ever filibuster a supreme court nominee and one of the people involved in said filibuster was a former black president.</quote> Oh really</quote> Not to mention one of the guys he filibustered wound up becoming Chief Justice and literally saved his healthcare bill from being ruled unconstitutional. If anything, Democrats owe the GOP a freebie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crazyman93 04/06/17 6:35:40 PM #70:	ChrisHansen59 posted... Gorsuch will be confirmed Friday Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. --- let's lubricate friction material! ~nickels, Cars & Trucks <cite>Crazyman93 posted [p:876683648] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChrisHansen59 posted...</cite> <quote>Gorsuch will be confirmed Friday</quote> Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 04/06/17 6:36:15 PM #71:	Kim Kusanagi posted... When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" I'm pretty sure it was over of the other dozen people with a Sephiroth username --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:876683684] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin </quote> There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" I'm pretty sure it was over of the other dozen people with a Sephiroth username</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 04/06/17 6:47:30 PM #72:	Mal_Fet posted... There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" It's revenge for Trump's involvement in the birther movement. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:876684388] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote>There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" </quote> It's revenge for Trump's involvement in the birther movement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 04/06/17 6:51:53 PM #73:	So Congress officially has unlimited power, more or less. --- http://www.lowbird.com/data/images/2011/06/pr0gramm-n4gjfl.gif http://churchm.ag/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/batman-mario-2-key.gif <cite>Kineth posted [p:876684653] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>So Congress officially has unlimited power, more or less.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zaltera 04/06/17 7:19:35 PM #74:	Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death. --- Why is it that he can hit a 3rd baseman on a frozen rope from 300 feet away, but he can't hit a 12 foot tall catcher from 60 feet 6 inches away? -Awesomeo_4000 <cite>Zaltera posted [p:876686299] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><quote>Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 04/06/17 7:20:51 PM #75:	Zaltera posted... Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death. Scalia voted to make corruption legal. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:876686373] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zaltera posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death.</quote> Scalia voted to make corruption legal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 04/06/17 7:20:55 PM #76:	Zaltera posted... Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death. We're not all liberal shit stains. --- Oda break tracker 2017- 2 (1) Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:876686377] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zaltera posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death.</quote> We're not all liberal shit stains.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 04/06/17 7:22:24 PM #77:	Zaltera posted... Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death. And a board which mockingly encouraged Clarence Thomas to follow his example >_> --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:876686487] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zaltera posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death.</quote> And a board which mockingly encouraged Clarence Thomas to follow his example >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aysander 04/06/17 7:30:48 PM #78:	This still doesn't nuke the Fillibuster against Legislation, and let's be honest, that's where it has serves its purpose as a minority party security to the best ability anyways. --- Each new party member is unique but Magilou the Witch is easily the highlight. <cite>Aysander posted [p:876687034] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>This still doesn't nuke the Fillibuster against Legislation, and let's be honest, that's where it has serves its purpose as a minority party security to the best ability anyways.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/06/17 8:29:23 PM #79:	Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" I'm pretty sure it was over of the other dozen people with a Sephiroth username Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence but hey thanks for proving I was right about you not knowing. --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876690484] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>When someone made a topic about Trump being a Russian shill paid by Putin </quote> There's not circumstantial evidence for that though. There's zero evidence for that. Also, I wasn't in any topic like that. I generally ignore Russia topics or only make condescending posts about people who say they "hacked the election" I'm pretty sure it was over of the other dozen people with a Sephiroth username</quote> Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence but hey thanks for proving I was right about you not knowing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Correct_Facts 04/06/17 8:32:12 PM #80:	Guys, Kim Kusanagi is a confirmed troll, and not a very good one either. You're better off ignoring him. Can't believe people don't know this already. <cite>Correct_Facts posted [p:876690671] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>Guys, Kim Kusanagi is a confirmed troll, and not a very good one either. You're better off ignoring him. Can't believe people don't know this already.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 04/06/17 11:37:28 PM #81:	Zeus posted... Zaltera posted... Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good. I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death. And a board which mockingly encouraged Clarence Thomas to follow his example >_> jfc i remember that --- Knowledge is power, power corrupts. Study hard and become evil. <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:876702547] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zaltera posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Isn't he rumored to have views very similar to the late Justice Scalia's? If so, good.</quote> I am kind of surprised to see this posted on a board full of people who celebrated his death.</quote> And a board which mockingly encouraged Clarence Thomas to follow his example >_></quote> jfc i remember that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/07/17 8:30:48 AM #82:	Correct_Facts posted... Guys, Kim Kusanagi is a confirmed troll, and not a very good one either. You're better off ignoring him. Can't believe people don't know this already. You seem upset --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876719382] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Correct_Facts posted...</cite> <quote>Guys, Kim Kusanagi is a confirmed troll, and not a very good one either. You're better off ignoring him. Can't believe people don't know this already.</quote> You seem upset</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 04/07/17 11:06:01 AM #83:	Kim Kusanagi posted... Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence Ok what is it --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:876726732] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence </quote> Ok what is it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guardian-Sloth 04/07/17 11:10:03 AM #84:	The Democrats knew when Obama nominated a major liberal to be on the Supreme Court that Republicans weren't going to do it, we're never going to get anything done, even if it's something Dems want, until they stop being butthurt losers. <cite>Guardian-Sloth posted [p:876726982] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote>The Democrats knew when Obama nominated a major liberal to be on the Supreme Court that Republicans weren't going to do it, we're never going to get anything done, even if it's something Dems want, until they stop being butthurt losers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#85	Post #85 was unavailable or deleted.
Darklit_Minuet 04/07/17 12:11:55 PM #86:	Guardian-Sloth posted... The Democrats knew when Obama nominated a major liberal to be on the Supreme Court that Republicans weren't going to do it, we're never going to get anything done, even if it's something Dems want, until they stop being butthurt losers. I wish they nominated a major liberal <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:876730544] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Guardian-Sloth posted...</cite> <quote>The Democrats knew when Obama nominated a major liberal to be on the Supreme Court that Republicans weren't going to do it, we're never going to get anything done, even if it's something Dems want, until they stop being butthurt losers.</quote> I wish they nominated a major liberal</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 04/07/17 12:25:54 PM #87:	Mal_Fet posted... Kim Kusanagi posted... Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence Ok what is it I'm too lazy to post what's already on cnn Your fake news disclaimer won't change the facts --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:876731351] in Republican... [t:75205548]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kim Kusanagi posted...</cite> <quote>Actually the whole investigation began because there's more than circumstantial evidence </quote> Ok what is it</quote> I'm too lazy to post what's already on cnn Your fake news disclaimer won't change the facts</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Republicans just nuked the filibuster (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Republicans just nuked the filibuster