Poll of the Day > Why is Avatar at Disney World?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Cotton_Eye_Joe 04/01/17 2:33:13 PM #1:	Disney didn't produce Avatar. Is Disney just firing back since Universal took Marvel? <cite>Cotton_Eye_Joe posted [p:876314765] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>Disney didn't produce Avatar. Is Disney just firing back since Universal took Marvel?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Claude_Frollo 04/01/17 2:33:55 PM #2:	Disney has Marvel. --- "Look man, no matter how much you kiss up to me, I'm not gonna indulge in your fetish" - DorkLink, the best poster on GameFAQs <cite>Claude_Frollo posted [p:876314807] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>Disney has Marvel.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 04/01/17 3:03:44 PM #3:	More of an answer to Univeral and the Wizarding World of Harry Potter. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:876316293] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>More of an answer to Univeral and the Wizarding World of Harry Potter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 04/01/17 3:45:37 PM #4:	The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "This Mead guy is an real jerk, I'm outta here" -brisashi <cite>Mead posted [p:876318358] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#5	Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
Claude_Frollo 04/01/17 3:59:30 PM #6:	Zangulus posted... Mead posted... The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares. It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff. --- "Look man, no matter how much you kiss up to me, I'm not gonna indulge in your fetish" - DorkLink, the best poster on GameFAQs <cite>Claude_Frollo posted [p:876319082] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares.</quote> It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LaggnFragnLarry 04/01/17 4:35:19 PM #7:	they had some preview offer for the new avatar land opening in may last week but that shit filled up super fast <cite>LaggnFragnLarry posted [p:876320971] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>they had some preview offer for the new avatar land opening in may last week but that shit filled up super fast</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#8	Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
Erik_P 04/01/17 9:26:01 PM #10:	Zangulus posted... Mead posted... The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares. Because movie studios always make sound business decisions and have never made a movie nobody cares about. --- #welchingalldayerrday <cite>Erik_P posted [p:876336700] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares.</quote> Because movie studios always make sound business decisions and have never made a movie nobody cares about.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KevinceKostner 04/01/17 9:31:32 PM #11:	Avatar came out at just the right time when 3d hit it's new stride, it could easily have been another John Carter of Mars had it come out a little later. <cite>KevinceKostner posted [p:876337053] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>Avatar came out at just the right time when 3d hit it's new stride, it could easily have been another John Carter of Mars had it come out a little later.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#12	Post #12 was unavailable or deleted.
Erik_P 04/01/17 9:38:33 PM #13:	Zangulus posted... Erik_P posted... Because movie studios always make sound business decisions and have never made a movie nobody cares about. Hence the first half of my post... The first half of your post is meaningless. Just because it was successful doesn't mean the general public wants 4 more of the fucking things. --- #welchingalldayerrday <cite>Erik_P posted [p:876337466] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote>Because movie studios always make sound business decisions and have never made a movie nobody cares about.</quote> Hence the first half of my post...</quote> The first half of your post is meaningless. Just because it was successful doesn't mean the general public wants 4 more of the fucking things.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 04/01/17 9:41:55 PM #14:	Claude_Frollo posted... Zangulus posted... Mead posted... The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares. It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff. To be fair, when they made the original deal with 20th Century Fox back in 2011, there was still major hype for Avatar, and the sequels had already been announced (delays notwithstanding). Seeing that they're going to be making many sequels, this is the PERFECT time to build up park attractions (since there would be mutual benefit from the old deal; More hype from Disney means more money for the future film creators, and more viewership for the future films means more demand for the Disney attractions / merchandise from the deal). --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:876337643] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Claude_Frollo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares.</quote> It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff.</quote> To be fair, when they made the original deal with 20th Century Fox back in 2011, there was still major hype for Avatar, and the sequels had already been announced (delays notwithstanding). Seeing that they're going to be making many sequels, this is the PERFECT time to build up park attractions (since there would be mutual benefit from the old deal; More hype from Disney means more money for the future film creators, and more viewership for the future films means more demand for the Disney attractions / merchandise from the deal).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 04/01/17 9:46:22 PM #15:	The first movie wasn't even any good.. I don't think I have ever met a single person that was like omg avatar was amazing. <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:876337912] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>The first movie wasn't even any good.. I don't think I have ever met a single person that was like omg avatar was amazing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 04/01/17 9:52:27 PM #16:	MICHALECOLE posted... The first movie wasn't even any good.. I don't think I have ever met a single person that was like omg avatar was amazing. People will pay good money to see blue nipples. Let's be real, this is not the first time James Cameron has used nipples to generate interest (and it probably won't be the last). --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:876338313] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>MICHALECOLE posted...</cite> <quote>The first movie wasn't even any good.. I don't think I have ever met a single person that was like omg avatar was amazing.</quote> People will pay good money to see blue nipples. Let's be real, this is not the first time James Cameron has used nipples to generate interest (and it probably won't be the last).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 04/02/17 3:17:02 AM #17:	Claude_Frollo posted... Zangulus posted... Mead posted... The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares. It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff. I mean, it might... but Avatar came and went. It was cool to look at, but that's about it. I can't see the sequel doing as well, because the novelty just won't be there anymore. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:876353797] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Claude_Frollo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares.</quote> It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff.</quote> I mean, it might... but Avatar came and went. It was cool to look at, but that's about it. I can't see the sequel doing as well, because the novelty just won't be there anymore.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
helIy 04/02/17 3:20:40 AM #18:	Cotton_Eye_Joe posted... Is Disney just firing back since Universal took Marvel? ...disney owns marvel --- this is my sig now <cite>helIy posted [p:876353934] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cotton_Eye_Joe posted...</cite> <quote>Is Disney just firing back since Universal took Marvel?</quote> ...disney owns marvel</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Snake 04/02/17 3:51:56 AM #19:	DeathMagnetic80 posted... Claude_Frollo posted... Zangulus posted... Mead posted... The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares. It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff. I mean, it might... but Avatar came and went. It was cool to look at, but that's about it. I can't see the sequel doing as well, because the novelty just won't be there anymore. Even if they don't do as well as the record breaker of the original, it's highly unlikely any of them will outright flop and being that they're all being filmed together, they're all gonna get released regardless. It's weird to me that some people seem to have the mindset that if these films weren't to break 1b they would automatically determine them to be failures like they need to surpass the original to be successful and worth anything. --- Are you not....entertained!? <cite>Snake posted [p:876354840] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Claude_Frollo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The better question is why did they spend so much money to support a franchise that no one has cared about in years</quote> One of the top grossing movies of all time. 4 sequels coming. No one cares.</quote> It was huge when it came out, but he's got a point. The hype for Avatar dropped off a cliff.</quote> I mean, it might... but Avatar came and went. It was cool to look at, but that's about it. I can't see the sequel doing as well, because the novelty just won't be there anymore.</quote> Even if they don't do as well as the record breaker of the original, it's highly unlikely any of them will outright flop and being that they're all being filmed together, they're all gonna get released regardless. It's weird to me that some people seem to have the mindset that if these films weren't to break 1b they would automatically determine them to be failures like they need to surpass the original to be successful and worth anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Claude_Frollo 04/02/17 11:20:36 AM #20:	Disney can have their irrelevant Avatar world, because Universal will have Super Nintendo World and that's all that matters. --- "Look man, no matter how much you kiss up to me, I'm not gonna indulge in your fetish" - DorkLink, the best poster on GameFAQs <cite>Claude_Frollo posted [p:876366355] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>Disney can have their irrelevant Avatar world, because Universal will have Super Nintendo World and that's all that matters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 04/02/17 12:52:02 PM #21:	Cotton_Eye_Joe posted... Disney didn't produce Avatar. Same reason Star Wars has been for almost 20 years already? --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:876370885] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cotton_Eye_Joe posted...</cite> <quote>Disney didn't produce Avatar. </quote> Same reason Star Wars has been for almost 20 years already?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 04/02/17 1:16:58 PM #22:	I'm pretty amped about the Star Wars land Disney is also building at least. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:876372242] in Why is Ava... [t:75185098]...</cite> <quote>I'm pretty amped about the Star Wars land Disney is also building at least.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Why is Avatar at Disney World? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Why is Avatar at Disney World?