Board 8 > Controvery over new MTG art that features bears.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
TomNook 05/02/22 9:55:14 PM #1:	Is this good for a kids card game? Yes No Maybe Why Pokemon and Yu-Gi-O are better Wizards needs to fix the mana system Is this good for a kids card game? - Results (71 votes) Yes 43.66% (31 votes) 31 No 16.9% (12 votes) 12 Maybe 2.82% (2 votes) 2 Why 12.68% (9 votes) 9 Pokemon and Yu-Gi-O are better 12.68% (9 votes) 9 Wizards needs to fix the mana system 11.27% (8 votes) 8 There is already a shitstorm online over new card art for an old card called Bearscape. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/2/3/AAbtIzAADMTX.jpg What do you think? --- Bells, bells, bells! <cite>TomNook posted [p:964744945] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote> Is this good for a kids card game? Yes No Maybe Why Pokemon and Yu-Gi-O are better Wizards needs to fix the mana system Vote View Results Is this good for a kids card game? - Results (71 votes) Yes 43.66% (31 votes) 31 No 16.9% (12 votes) 12 Maybe 2.82% (2 votes) 2 Why 12.68% (9 votes) 9 Pokemon and Yu-Gi-O are better 12.68% (9 votes) 9 Wizards needs to fix the mana system 11.27% (8 votes) 8 Show Voting Form There is already a shitstorm online over new card art for an old card called Bearscape. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/2/3/AAbtIzAADMTX.jpg What do you think? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 05/02/22 10:37:22 PM #2:	magics audience is on average older than Pokmon/Yugioh, its not really marketed as a thing for kids (its got 13+ on the packaging), so I think its fine and this is a limited time availability version of a card that is only obtainable by purchasing it directly from WotCs website, so its not like a kid is going to randomly open it a booster pack or something --- For your Azuarc* .* At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:964746100] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>magics audience is on average older than Pokmon/Yugioh, its not really marketed as a thing for kids (its got 13+ on the packaging), so I think its fine and this is a limited time availability version of a card that is only obtainable by purchasing it directly from WotCs website, so its not like a kid is going to randomly open it a booster pack or something </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MZero 05/02/22 10:43:10 PM #3:	is that guy in the back getting a handy --- MZero, to the extreme https://www.twitch.tv/kabazame <cite>MZero posted [p:964746238] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>is that guy in the back getting a handy </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#4	Post #4 was unavailable or deleted.
Blaziken 05/02/22 10:48:04 PM #5:	Thank God I didn't come in here to find a picture of that banshee Marjorie Taylor Greene. --- Inviso thinks all starters should be Fire/Fighting. http://i.imgur.com/oOSm64C.gif <cite>Blaziken posted [p:964746359] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Thank God I didn't come in here to find a picture of that banshee Marjorie Taylor Greene. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 05/02/22 10:48:25 PM #6:	im pretty sure they did go back on the Chandra thing at some point and admitted it was a bit of a fuck up. I think some of the more recent stories have alluded to her attraction to women. also another one of these pride month arts, Collective Voyage has her on it. Its not as blatant as the Saheeli/Huatli art, but its something https://www.reddit.com/gallery/uguti1 --- For your Azuarc* .* At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:964746362] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>im pretty sure they did go back on the Chandra thing at some point and admitted it was a bit of a fuck up. I think some of the more recent stories have alluded to her attraction to women. also another one of these pride month arts, Collective Voyage has her on it. Its not as blatant as the Saheeli/Huatli art, but its something https://www.reddit.com/gallery/uguti1 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
paperwarior 05/02/22 10:52:58 PM #7:	Blaziken posted... Thank God I didn't come in here to find a picture of that banshee Marjorie Taylor Greene. Hey, a banshee would make a perfectly fine MTG creature. --- "God Hand is the ultimate expression of the joy of humanity, specifically the punching part of the joy of humanity."-Shigeru Miyamoto <cite>paperwarior posted [p:964746475] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Blaziken posted... </cite> <quote>Thank God I didn't come in here to find a picture of that banshee Marjorie Taylor Greene.</quote>Hey, a banshee would make a perfectly fine MTG creature. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#8	Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
Paratroopa1 05/02/22 11:27:57 PM #9:	awesome. also it's apparently a promo card so who gives a shit <cite>Paratroopa1 posted [p:964747357] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>awesome. also it's apparently a promo card so who gives a shit </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kenri 05/02/22 11:34:30 PM #10:	This is really, really funny and if people are actually mad about it that makes it even funnier. Missed opportunity for a killer Phil Foglio art though --- Congrats to BKSheikah, who knows more about years than anyone else. <cite>Kenri posted [p:964747508] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>This is really, really funny and if people are actually mad about it that makes it even funnier. Missed opportunity for a killer Phil Foglio art though </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aecioo 05/02/22 11:35:14 PM #11:	oh shit i'm sorry --- http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcb35gGx0t1qailr4o1_500.gif http://www.megavideo.com/?v=57N0YAEJ <cite>Aecioo posted [p:964747521] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>oh shit i'm sorry </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zachnorn 05/02/22 11:38:13 PM #12:	sorry for what --- <D <cite>Zachnorn posted [p:964747571] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>sorry for what </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pjbasis 05/03/22 12:02:02 AM #13:	Lmao --- http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/B8%20Girls%202012/pjbas.png <cite>pjbasis posted [p:964748075] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lucavi000 05/03/22 12:06:26 AM #14:	isnt this part of a secret lair drop? --- "Doesn't matter, still obtainable. You were wrong, simply admit it and apologize for your ignorance and s*** attitude." - Firemage7777 to SuperZay <cite>Lucavi000 posted [p:964748162] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>isnt this part of a secret lair drop? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/03/22 1:31:52 AM #15:	i like this. hopefully any controversy is light Lucavi000 posted... isnt this part of a secret lair drop? yes https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/first-look-pride-across-multiverse-2022-05-02 Paratroopa1 posted... awesome. also it's apparently a promo card so who gives a shit also this. i'm not serious enough about the game to ever purchase a secret lair. if i were really hankering to get serious about modern or legacy or something i might --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:964749612] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>i like this. hopefully any controversy is light Lucavi000 posted... </cite> <quote>isnt this part of a secret lair drop?</quote>yes https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/first-look-pride-across-multiverse-2022-05-02 Paratroopa1 posted... </cite> <quote>awesome. also it's apparently a promo card so who gives a shit</quote>also this. i'm not serious enough about the game to ever purchase a secret lair. if i were really hankering to get serious about modern or legacy or something i might </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/03/22 1:43:35 AM #16:	ok, i've seen some "omg, how dare a company create a non-straight product without TRULY BELIEVING in it". pretty silly --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:964749771] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>ok, i've seen some "omg, how dare a company create a non-straight product without TRULY BELIEVING in it". pretty silly </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bane_Of_Despair 05/03/22 7:02:39 AM #17:	As someone who this card is right up their alley for, lol --- You were the cancer, that's all you'll ever be I really messed up this contest, but azuarc gave it a Breath of fresh air <cite>Bane_Of_Despair posted [p:964752499] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>As someone who this card is right up their alley for, lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#18	Post #18 was unavailable or deleted.
MoogleKupo141 05/03/22 7:22:57 AM #19:	UltimaterializerX posted... This is actually true though. If they actually want to be allies then the content should not be region locked. They seem to have been a little over eager with the regions that have been locked out in this case, but in general I dont understand this position. (seems like they defaulted to off, then manually enabled it for certain countries. Theres no actual reason as far as I can tell to not allow it in South America. Its weird.) there are countries where legally they cannot show this stuff. Thats the countrys governments fault, not the companys. Its preferable to make it available for some people than for no one at all. --- For your Azuarc* .* At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:964752678] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>UltimaterializerX posted... </cite> <quote>This is actually true though. If they actually want to be allies then the content should not be region locked.</quote> They seem to have been a little over eager with the regions that have been locked out in this case, but in general I dont understand this position. (seems like they defaulted to off, then manually enabled it for certain countries. Theres no actual reason as far as I can tell to not allow it in South America. Its weird.) there are countries where legally they cannot show this stuff. Thats the countrys governments fault, not the companys. Its preferable to make it available for some people than for no one at all. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#20	Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
MrGreenonion 05/03/22 11:37:43 AM #21:	TomNook posted... Is this good for a kids card game? If a kid has $30 to special-order the Secret Lair that has this card in it then I say let them have it, they know what they want. EDIT: Also ughhh another reason I need to seriously consider spending $80 on a Doubling Season for my Simic Tokens Commander deck, plus another $40 or whatever for Parallel Lives jeeze --- Jessie she/her <cite>MrGreenonion posted [p:964756966] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>TomNook posted... </cite> <quote>Is this good for a kids card game?</quote>If a kid has $30 to special-order the Secret Lair that has this card in it then I say let them have it, they know what they want. EDIT: Also ughhh another reason I need to seriously consider spending $80 on a Doubling Season for my Simic Tokens Commander deck, plus another $40 or whatever for Parallel Lives jeeze </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagSEP 05/03/22 11:48:52 AM #22:	Maybe you should tell us why it's not good, TC. --- #SEP #Awesome #Excellent #Greatness #SteveNash #VitaminWater #SmellingLikeTheVault #Pigeon #Sexy #ActuallyAVeryIntelligentVelociraptor #Heel #CoolSpot #EndOfSig <cite>HashtagSEP posted [p:964757186] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Maybe you should tell us why it's not good, TC. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackMageJawa 05/03/22 12:57:33 PM #23:	What was the controversy with Chandra? --- The shattered stage is set and there's a role you must fulfil <cite>BlackMageJawa posted [p:964758958] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>What was the controversy with Chandra?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TotallyNotMI 05/03/22 1:03:20 PM #24:	BlackMageJawa posted... What was the controversy with Chandra? For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/8/AAcguBAADMZO.jpg I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then. --- I'm not sure who this MI guy is but he sounds sexy. <cite>TotallyNotMI posted [p:964759112] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>BlackMageJawa posted... </cite> <quote>What was the controversy with Chandra?</quote>For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/8/AAcguBAADMZO.jpg I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alanna82 05/03/22 1:31:43 PM #25:	Okay, my husband and I thought this was funny. I thought this was going to be from an "un" set. Not the first MTG art that has been controversial. (There's some really phallic art in I believe Mirage?) --- Don't mess with a Bunny! <cite>Alanna82 posted [p:964759878] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Okay, my husband and I thought this was funny. I thought this was going to be from an "un" set. Not the first MTG art that has been controversial. (There's some really phallic art in I believe Mirage?) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 05/03/22 1:59:26 PM #26:	TotallyNotMI posted... For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then. I think the most damning thing about that excerpt is there are 5 names mentioned in a passage that only needs 2 to convey its basic idea. Let's talk about Chandra and Nissa, but hey let's name drop Gideon Jura, Nicol Bolas, and Ral Zarek-- people love those guys! --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:964760649] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>TotallyNotMI posted... </cite> <quote>For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then.</quote> I think the most damning thing about that excerpt is there are 5 names mentioned in a passage that only needs 2 to convey its basic idea. Let's talk about Chandra and Nissa, but hey let's name drop Gideon Jura, Nicol Bolas, and Ral Zarek-- people love those guys! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Emeraldegg 05/03/22 2:14:20 PM #27:	This is no different than any "controversy" about anything that portrays what some terrible people would classify as "SJW stuff." People complaining about this will complain about any medium that gives representation to sexual preferences they don't agree with. --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss <cite>Emeraldegg posted [p:964761005] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>This is no different than any "controversy" about anything that portrays what some terrible people would classify as "SJW stuff." People complaining about this will complain about any medium that gives representation to sexual preferences they don't agree with. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeepsPraw 05/03/22 5:07:03 PM #28:	As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon. --- pepsi for tv-game <cite>DeepsPraw posted [p:964765541] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Chaeix 05/03/22 5:23:27 PM #29:	this is hilarious --- we're all buds~jc~ <DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs <cite>Chaeix posted [p:964765960] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>this is hilarious </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lucavi000 05/03/22 7:46:50 PM #30:	banananor posted... i like this. hopefully any controversy is light yes https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/first-look-pride-across-multiverse-2022-05-02 also this. i'm not serious enough about the game to ever purchase a secret lair. if i were really hankering to get serious about modern or legacy or something i might yeah that was my point, its a promo card essentially so it will more than likely never actually be seen in the wild in a deck lol --- "Doesn't matter, still obtainable. You were wrong, simply admit it and apologize for your ignorance and s*** attitude." - Firemage7777 to SuperZay <cite>Lucavi000 posted [p:964769662] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>banananor posted... </cite> <quote>i like this. hopefully any controversy is light yes https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/first-look-pride-across-multiverse-2022-05-02 also this. i'm not serious enough about the game to ever purchase a secret lair. if i were really hankering to get serious about modern or legacy or something i might</quote> yeah that was my point, its a promo card essentially so it will more than likely never actually be seen in the wild in a deck lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HeroDelTiempo17 05/03/22 7:53:54 PM #31:	TotallyNotMI posted... I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then. That's what MoogleKupo was alluding to, this was a retcon that has itself been retconned. The backlash was significant and she's gay again (although I don't think with Nissa). --- I definitely did not forget to put the 2020 GOTD Guru winner, azuarc in my sig! <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:964769823] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>TotallyNotMI posted... </cite> <quote>I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then.</quote> That's what MoogleKupo was alluding to, this was a retcon that has itself been retconned. The backlash was significant and she's gay again (although I don't think with Nissa). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aecioo 05/03/22 7:54:04 PM #32:	DeepsPraw posted... As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon. shut up guiga --- http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcb35gGx0t1qailr4o1_500.gif http://www.megavideo.com/?v=57N0YAEJ <cite>Aecioo posted [p:964769830] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>DeepsPraw posted... </cite> <quote>As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon.</quote> shut up guiga </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 05/03/22 7:55:42 PM #33:	HeroDelTiempo17 posted... That's what MoogleKupo was alluding to, this was a retcon that has itself been retconned. The backlash was significant and she's gay again. shes bi or pan. I dont think the intent was ever for her to not be into men too --- For your Azuarc* .* At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:964769878] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>HeroDelTiempo17 posted... </cite> <quote>That's what MoogleKupo was alluding to, this was a retcon that has itself been retconned. The backlash was significant and she's gay again.</quote> shes bi or pan. I dont think the intent was ever for her to not be into men too </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
neonreaper 05/03/22 7:59:35 PM #34:	That one dude looks like a total third wheel --- Donny: Are they gonna hurt us, Walter? Walter: No, Donny. These men are cowards. <cite>neonreaper posted [p:964769986] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>That one dude looks like a total third wheel </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aecioo 05/03/22 8:01:39 PM #35:	neonreaper posted... That one dude looks like a total third wheel plz no kink shaming --- http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcb35gGx0t1qailr4o1_500.gif http://www.megavideo.com/?v=57N0YAEJ <cite>Aecioo posted [p:964770040] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>neonreaper posted... </cite> <quote>That one dude looks like a total third wheel</quote> plz no kink shaming </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pokalicious 05/03/22 8:21:30 PM #36:	What's the old art? --- ph33r teh masta~! Currently playing - Pokemon GO <cite>Pokalicious posted [p:964770511] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>What's the old art? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bane_Of_Despair 05/03/22 8:23:33 PM #37:	Banned actually, you can only use gay bears now for the card --- You were the cancer, that's all you'll ever be I really messed up this contest, but azuarc gave it a Breath of fresh air <cite>Bane_Of_Despair posted [p:964770555] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Banned actually, you can only use gay bears now for the card </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 05/03/22 8:24:57 PM #38:	Bane_Of_Despair posted... Banned actually, you can only use gay bears now for the card how do you know that the old bears arent gay --- Kneel... or you will be knelt <cite>NFUN posted [p:964770600] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Bane_Of_Despair posted... </cite> <quote>Banned actually, you can only use gay bears now for the card</quote>how do you know that the old bears arent gay </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/03/22 8:39:09 PM #39:	Aecioo posted... shut up guiga deeps is guiga? it all makes sense now --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:964770950] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Aecioo posted... </cite> <quote>shut up guiga</quote>deeps is guiga? it all makes sense now </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
paperwarior 05/04/22 12:18:23 AM #40:	NFUN posted... how do you know that the old bears arent gay It's not a safe assumption. You shouldn't assume things about actual ursine bears. It might make them mad. --- "God Hand is the ultimate expression of the joy of humanity, specifically the punching part of the joy of humanity."-Shigeru Miyamoto <cite>paperwarior posted [p:964775740] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>NFUN posted... </cite> <quote>how do you know that the old bears arent gay</quote> It's not a safe assumption. You shouldn't assume things about actual ursine bears. It might make them mad. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Waluigi1 05/04/22 12:37:30 AM #41:	This is real??? How do I get it?? --- PSN, and GT: Waluigi1 Switch FC: SW-6848-3841-9099 <cite>Waluigi1 posted [p:964776059] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>This is real??? How do I get it?? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UshiromiyaEva 05/04/22 1:13:50 AM #42:	TotallyNotMI posted... For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/8/AAcguBAADMZO.jpg I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then. NGL the writing for the average fanfic for children's cartoons is better than this. Like if I pick a random Amphibia fanfic it has a 50% chance at bare minimum of being better. This is like that one Mass effect book when the ninja eats Anderson's cereal. --- https://twitter.com/OocWTC/status/1348011667976699904?s=19 <cite>UshiromiyaEva posted [p:964776575] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>TotallyNotMI posted... </cite> <quote>For a while in the stories they were building up to a Chandra/Nissa pairing. Then in one of the books the author wrote... this... and actually thought it was good. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/8/AAcguBAADMZO.jpg I've stopped reading the fiction after this book so I don't know what's come since then.</quote> NGL the writing for the average fanfic for children's cartoons is better than this. Like if I pick a random Amphibia fanfic it has a 50% chance at bare minimum of being better. This is like that one Mass effect book when the ninja eats Anderson's cereal. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChichiriMuyo 05/04/22 1:29:01 AM #43:	DeepsPraw posted... As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon. Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds. --- "If you ever feel good about yourself, just look on the Internet." - Ryan Reynolds <cite>ChichiriMuyo posted [p:964776795] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>DeepsPraw posted... </cite> <quote>As a fat, hairy man, I feel personally objectified. Seriously though, from what I understand about WOTC's policies, this art would be completely unacceptable in a main set and is extremely questionable as a Secret Lair. Maybe WOTC has changed their policy on sexual content, but as recently as 2 years ago they banned someone from their content creator program for "sexualizing" Magic. So it seems a bit odd that they'd greenlight a explicitly sexual card like this. Honestly I'm all for softcore porn on Magic cards. Hopefully this means bikini babe pinups are on the horizon.</quote>Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Waluigi1 05/04/22 1:29:58 AM #44:	UshiromiyaEva posted... NGL the writing for the average fanfic for children's cartoons is better than this. Like if I pick a random Amphibia fanfic it has a 50% chance at bare minimum of being better. This is like that one Mass effect book when the ninja eats Anderson's cereal. Yeah that writing is legitimately grade school writing. I've read random erotic fiction much better written lol. --- PSN, and GT: Waluigi1 Switch FC: SW-6848-3841-9099 <cite>Waluigi1 posted [p:964776806] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>UshiromiyaEva posted... </cite> <quote>NGL the writing for the average fanfic for children's cartoons is better than this. Like if I pick a random Amphibia fanfic it has a 50% chance at bare minimum of being better. This is like that one Mass effect book when the ninja eats Anderson's cereal.</quote>Yeah that writing is legitimately grade school writing. I've read random erotic fiction much better written lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/04/22 1:45:15 AM #45:	Waluigi1 posted... This is real??? How do I get it?? pay way too much money for cardboard online https://secretlair.wizards.com/us Lucavi000 posted... yeah that was my point, its a promo card essentially so it will more than likely never actually be seen in the wild in a deck lol you'd be surprised. mtg players love to bling out their junk and it's a reskinned version of an existing card so who knows https://www.cardkingdom.com/mtg/odyssey/bearscape --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:964777006] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Waluigi1 posted... </cite> <quote>This is real??? How do I get it??</quote>pay way too much money for cardboard online https://secretlair.wizards.com/us Lucavi000 posted... </cite> <quote>yeah that was my point, its a promo card essentially so it will more than likely never actually be seen in the wild in a deck lol</quote>you'd be surprised. mtg players love to bling out their junk and it's a reskinned version of an existing card so who knows https://www.cardkingdom.com/mtg/odyssey/bearscape </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/04/22 1:45:33 AM #46:	oh and yeah, i don't read the mtg books --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:964777010] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>oh and yeah, i don't read the mtg books </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeepsPraw 05/04/22 1:53:46 AM #47:	ChichiriMuyo posted... Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds. Fair enough. I wasn't able to find any official word from WOTC on any sexual content policy. Still think it's awfully strange that straight-up fetish art is on an official card, especially nowadays. --- pepsi for tv-game <cite>DeepsPraw posted [p:964777120] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>ChichiriMuyo posted... </cite> <quote>Lizbeth Eden wasn't removed from the content creator program for any MtG art she created, she was removed for using MtG related art to promote her Only Fans. She was literally using their product to sell her porn, and it's their right to sever ties with her for that. Nothing about this art or literally hundreds of other "sexualized" pieces of MtG art violates their policy because it's actually a very liberal policy. What she did went well beyond the bounds.</quote>Fair enough. I wasn't able to find any official word from WOTC on any sexual content policy. Still think it's awfully strange that straight-up fetish art is on an official card, especially nowadays. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kenri 05/04/22 2:58:25 AM #48:	I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it? --- Congrats to BKSheikah, who knows more about years than anyone else. <cite>Kenri posted [p:964777806] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Chaeix 05/04/22 3:14:23 AM #49:	Kenri posted... I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it? because it has a pun, obviously. puns are just too kinky --- we're all buds~jc~ <DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs <cite>Chaeix posted [p:964777969] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Kenri posted... </cite> <quote>I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it?</quote>because it has a pun, obviously. puns are just too kinky </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeepsPraw 05/04/22 8:29:18 PM #50:	Kenri posted... I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it? If they just wanted burly guys for a bear pun, they could have been fully clothed, sitting around a campfire or something. Instead it's an orgy. --- pepsi for tv-game <cite>DeepsPraw posted [p:964797670] in Controvery... [t:80007290]...</cite> <quote>Kenri posted... </cite> <quote>I'm not sure how this is fetish art just because it has gay people on it?</quote>If they just wanted burly guys for a bear pun, they could have been fully clothed, sitting around a campfire or something. Instead it's an orgy. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Board 8 > Controvery over new MTG art that features bears. (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Controvery over new MTG art that features bears.