Board 8 > Survivor: Winners at War Topic 3: Only One Five-Day Week Left

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
DoctorBIind 05/14/20 2:11:39 AM #354:	I know I'm late to the party watching on the west coast, but maaaaan, I almost let myself believe Tony could lose. He's fine and all, but I was really rooting for Michelle/Natalie there. And to see Michelle receive zero votes is tragic. I did appreciate how unique their games were compared to each other and I acknowledge Tony deserved the win, but it would've been nice to see a fave of mine win for the first time S32. Great, unpredictable final in terms of those voted out prior to the final 3, but ultimately a very predictable winner. <cite>DoctorBIind posted [p:939127396] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I know I'm late to the party watching on the west coast, but maaaaan, I almost let myself believe Tony could lose. He's fine and all, but I was really rooting for Michelle/Natalie there. And to see Michelle receive zero votes is tragic. I did appreciate how unique their games were compared to each other and I acknowledge Tony deserved the win, but it would've been nice to see a fave of mine win for the first time S32. Great, unpredictable final in terms of those voted out prior to the final 3, but ultimately a very predictable winner. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 05/14/20 2:23:57 AM #355:	Good finale. I wish they would scrap the final four firemaking. Then it's 3-1 against Tony or 2-2 with Tony facing Michelle at firemaking. I would also support bringing back the Final 2. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:939127625] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Good finale. I wish they would scrap the final four firemaking. Then it's 3-1 against Tony or 2-2 with Tony facing Michelle at firemaking. I would also support bringing back the Final 2. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/14/20 9:57:42 AM #356:	So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit. Anyway Probst seems committed to getting S41 filmed and aired for the fall. Considering there will still be restrictions on social gatherings and travel, and Jeff's somewhat cryptic "we're always trying new things" comment last night, I'm bracing for it to be the TAR8 of Survivor, in terms of content, not necessarily quality - something different than we're used to, maybe a bit simplified (fewer players, shorter game, filmed in the US, etc.). --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939137706] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit. Anyway Probst seems committed to getting S41 filmed and aired for the fall. Considering there will still be restrictions on social gatherings and travel, and Jeff's somewhat cryptic "we're always trying new things" comment last night, I'm bracing for it to be the TAR8 of Survivor, in terms of content, not necessarily quality - something different than we're used to, maybe a bit simplified (fewer players, shorter game, filmed in the US, etc.). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 05/14/20 10:03:20 AM #357:	Underleveled posted... So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit. Anyway Probst seems committed to getting S41 filmed and aired for the fall. Considering there will still be restrictions on social gatherings and travel, and Jeff's somewhat cryptic "we're always trying new things" comment last night, I'm bracing for it to be the TAR8 of Survivor, in terms of content, not necessarily quality - something different than we're used to, maybe a bit simplified (fewer players, shorter game, filmed in the US, etc.). If they cast the Weaver family, I'm all for it. Although, I feel like I heard rumors that Rolly became a neo-Nazi...so...maybe not. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:939137950] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Underleveled posted... </cite> <quote>So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit. Anyway Probst seems committed to getting S41 filmed and aired for the fall. Considering there will still be restrictions on social gatherings and travel, and Jeff's somewhat cryptic "we're always trying new things" comment last night, I'm bracing for it to be the TAR8 of Survivor, in terms of content, not necessarily quality - something different than we're used to, maybe a bit simplified (fewer players, shorter game, filmed in the US, etc.).</quote> If they cast the Weaver family, I'm all for it. Although, I feel like I heard rumors that Rolly became a neo-Nazi...so...maybe not. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Mana Sword 05/14/20 11:32:54 AM #358:	Underleveled posted... So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit. Yeah this is accurate. <Redacted> and Jenna M. being the other two that were technically never voted out, but removed early for other reason. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/Gylgamesh501.png <cite>The Mana Sword posted [p:939141600] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Underleveled posted... </cite> <quote>So here's a piece of trivia that should be some consolation to Michele and her fans. Unless I'm missing someone, I believe she is currently the only Survivor to play multiple times who has never been voted out, medivac'd, or quit.</quote> Yeah this is accurate. <Redacted> and Jenna M. being the other two that were technically never voted out, but removed early for other reason. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/14/20 12:06:11 PM #359:	The Mana Sword posted... Redacted and Jenna M. being the other two that were technically never voted out, but removed early for other reason. And Colton --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939143252] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>The Mana Sword posted... </cite> <quote>Redacted and Jenna M. being the other two that were technically never voted out, but removed early for other reason.</quote>And Colton </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CoolCly 05/14/20 3:15:50 PM #360:	where the hell are the michelle votes --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG <cite>CoolCly posted [p:939152923] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>where the hell are the michelle votes </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CoolCly 05/14/20 3:42:03 PM #362:	So yeah i just finished the finale, my rough thoughts Tony played a great game all throughout so him winning is good. I like him a lot. But I really liked Michelle and thought she had a decent shot. I think Natalie did not play well at all. She had idols and won an immunity so she was completely safe from being voted out, but whenever she had strategic choice, I think she chose poorly Voted Ben in the first tribal council instead of Sarah (maybe because of fear of fire making) Chose Denise in the revote instead of Sarah (only reason I can think of is not wanting to force a fire making competition which would build the winners resume, as they would likely want to bring the winner to the end, but I think Natalie makes later errors that make me not want to give her credit for htis) Told Sarah about her second idol Played her idol incorrectly on herself, having no impact on the tribal Put Sarah against Tony for fire, meaning she has to face either Tony at the end or Sarah, who will have credit for: 1) that big speech at tribal about women empowerment that I think won her a lot of street cred 2) taking control of tribal and voting out Ben 3) beating Tony Vlachos, big papa of the season at fire. 4) joint credit for a lot of Ton'ys moves It's just all such bad choices, and I think we see enough of Michelle pointing out to Natalie why these are all bad ideas that these weren't her ideas I think MIchelle saw the right path through all of this, just like she did earlier with Nick and Jeremy, but her biggest weakness is not being able to convince her allies not to make stupid choices. Probably the biggest failure in this regard was not pushing harder to get Natalie to put her in for fire against Tony (another last minute dumb decision by Natalie) I don't necessarily think Michelle should have won even though I was rooting for her, I think she always had a really good sense of what was going on and what her path was and that's how she kept wiggling through every situation to the end. I'm unhappy she got no votes because I think she deserves a lot more credit for her game instead of Natalie I'm a lot more pro edge than most but I feel like Natalie got her votes because of the standard Edge bias of people who got to spend so much time with her throughout the game. I don't think she should have gotten that much credit. Ben should never be allowed on Survivor again. --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG <cite>CoolCly posted [p:939154161] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>So yeah i just finished the finale, my rough thoughts Tony played a great game all throughout so him winning is good. I like him a lot. But I really liked Michelle and thought she had a decent shot. I think Natalie did not play well at all. She had idols and won an immunity so she was completely safe from being voted out, but whenever she had strategic choice, I think she chose poorly Voted Ben in the first tribal council instead of Sarah (maybe because of fear of fire making)Chose Denise in the revote instead of Sarah (only reason I can think of is not wanting to force a fire making competition which would build the winners resume, as they would likely want to bring the winner to the end, but I think Natalie makes later errors that make me not want to give her credit for htis)Told Sarah about her second idolPlayed her idol incorrectly on herself, having no impact on the tribalPut Sarah against Tony for fire, meaning she has to face either Tony at the end or Sarah, who will have credit for:1) that big speech at tribal about women empowerment that I think won her a lot of street cred 2) taking control of tribal and voting out Ben 3) beating Tony Vlachos, big papa of the season at fire. 4) joint credit for a lot of Ton'ys moves It's just all such bad choices, and I think we see enough of Michelle pointing out to Natalie why these are all bad ideas that these weren't her ideas I think MIchelle saw the right path through all of this, just like she did earlier with Nick and Jeremy, but her biggest weakness is not being able to convince her allies not to make stupid choices. Probably the biggest failure in this regard was not pushing harder to get Natalie to put her in for fire against Tony (another last minute dumb decision by Natalie) I don't necessarily think Michelle should have won even though I was rooting for her, I think she always had a really good sense of what was going on and what her path was and that's how she kept wiggling through every situation to the end. I'm unhappy she got no votes because I think she deserves a lot more credit for her game instead of Natalie I'm a lot more pro edge than most but I feel like Natalie got her votes because of the standard Edge bias of people who got to spend so much time with her throughout the game. I don't think she should have gotten that much credit. Ben should never be allowed on Survivor again. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 05/14/20 4:02:34 PM #363:	It's a tough spot at that F6 vote, because you know Tony has an idol and you need to take him out, but you can't vote for him because he's gonna play his idol and be safe. So your options become Ben, Sarah and Denise. I think, less than making Natalie a BAD player, Sarah at least provided enough of an opening to make herself seem more appealing and more willing to work with Natalie than Ben/Denise did (and based on the edit, this seems likely, since neither Ben nor Denise seemed all that interested in playing anything other than sticking with that foursome). Of the two remaining, Ben was more of a lynch pin to the alliance that clear bottom of the totem pole Denise, so they targeted Ben. Going back to the above paragraph: Natalie was playing her idol at six. There's no guarantee she'd have immunity, or find a new idol at five. So she needs to keep the player most likely to benefit her game, hence targeting Denise in the revote. Not only was Sarah more willing to play with her/Michele, but if Natalie votes Sarah, it's a tiebreaker at best, and if Sarah wins fire, she's gonna feel even more alienated from Michele/Natalie, and be less willing to work with them at 5. This one is arguable. I'd say it's better to say "Hey Sarah, I have an idol. We should really work together to take control of the game with it". For all we know, if Natalie DOESN'T reveal that idol, maybe Sarah isn't so inclined to vote out Ben. Playing the idol incorrectly wouldn't matter anyway, since Ben got voted out. It shows the jury that Natalie was able to find an idol than Ben/Tony did not. Apparently, Michele had an emotional breakdown before tribal about the possibility to going to fire against Tony. Now, in retrospect, Natalie probably should've tried the Underwood strategy of beating Tony herself...but I can understand being gunshy about giving up a hard fought immunity after all she'd been through in the game. Basically, I'm not saying she played perfectly, and Chris Underwood does look like the much stronger returnee between the two, but I think that, for all her physical advantages, Chris had a much easier path to victory than Natalie did. In both cases, they returned to a group of five in which there was a CLEAR winner standing head and shoulders above all of the others. The difference is that in EoE, Rick was on the outs with the tribe and everyone KNEW he was a big threat, so it was easy for Chris to utilize Rick as a shield and temporary ally. With Natalie, she comes back into the game and the obvious winner (Tony) is insulated in a solid foursome with two players who seemed checked out of the game, and a third who seemed oblivious to the perception that she was a goat. Chris was able to hide his threat level behind Rick, whereas Natalie immediately became public enemy number one, since the only other outsider was someone more non-threatening, like Michele. I just think the collection of Victoria/Gavin/Lauren/Julie offered far more flexibility and maneuverability than we saw from Denise/Sarah/Ben. With that in mind, I think it was difficult for Natalie to play the kind of strong game she needed to play, and ultimately, I think the season came down to Tony being able to idol himself at six, win immunity at five, and win the fire-making at four. The EoE players were actually able to take Rick out, whereas the WaW cast couldn't take Tony out. That shouldn't necessarily be an indictment of Natalie's game. Tony just played REALLY well this season, and I think a far-too-large portion of the endgame cast allowed him to run circles around them, which limited options for the counteralliance of Natalie and Michele (particularly for Michele prior to the finale). --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:939155243] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>It's a tough spot at that F6 vote, because you know Tony has an idol and you need to take him out, but you can't vote for him because he's gonna play his idol and be safe. So your options become Ben, Sarah and Denise. I think, less than making Natalie a BAD player, Sarah at least provided enough of an opening to make herself seem more appealing and more willing to work with Natalie than Ben/Denise did (and based on the edit, this seems likely, since neither Ben nor Denise seemed all that interested in playing anything other than sticking with that foursome). Of the two remaining, Ben was more of a lynch pin to the alliance that clear bottom of the totem pole Denise, so they targeted Ben.Going back to the above paragraph: Natalie was playing her idol at six. There's no guarantee she'd have immunity, or find a new idol at five. So she needs to keep the player most likely to benefit her game, hence targeting Denise in the revote. Not only was Sarah more willing to play with her/Michele, but if Natalie votes Sarah, it's a tiebreaker at best, and if Sarah wins fire, she's gonna feel even more alienated from Michele/Natalie, and be less willing to work with them at 5.This one is arguable. I'd say it's better to say "Hey Sarah, I have an idol. We should really work together to take control of the game with it". For all we know, if Natalie DOESN'T reveal that idol, maybe Sarah isn't so inclined to vote out Ben.Playing the idol incorrectly wouldn't matter anyway, since Ben got voted out. It shows the jury that Natalie was able to find an idol than Ben/Tony did not.Apparently, Michele had an emotional breakdown before tribal about the possibility to going to fire against Tony. Now, in retrospect, Natalie probably should've tried the Underwood strategy of beating Tony herself...but I can understand being gunshy about giving up a hard fought immunity after all she'd been through in the game.Basically, I'm not saying she played perfectly, and Chris Underwood does look like the much stronger returnee between the two, but I think that, for all her physical advantages, Chris had a much easier path to victory than Natalie did. In both cases, they returned to a group of five in which there was a CLEAR winner standing head and shoulders above all of the others. The difference is that in EoE, Rick was on the outs with the tribe and everyone KNEW he was a big threat, so it was easy for Chris to utilize Rick as a shield and temporary ally. With Natalie, she comes back into the game and the obvious winner (Tony) is insulated in a solid foursome with two players who seemed checked out of the game, and a third who seemed oblivious to the perception that she was a goat. Chris was able to hide his threat level behind Rick, whereas Natalie immediately became public enemy number one, since the only other outsider was someone more non-threatening, like Michele. I just think the collection of Victoria/Gavin/Lauren/Julie offered far more flexibility and maneuverability than we saw from Denise/Sarah/Ben. With that in mind, I think it was difficult for Natalie to play the kind of strong game she needed to play, and ultimately, I think the season came down to Tony being able to idol himself at six, win immunity at five, and win the fire-making at four. The EoE players were actually able to take Rick out, whereas the WaW cast couldn't take Tony out. That shouldn't necessarily be an indictment of Natalie's game. Tony just played REALLY well this season, and I think a far-too-large portion of the endgame cast allowed him to run circles around them, which limited options for the counteralliance of Natalie and Michele (particularly for Michele prior to the finale). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peridiam 05/14/20 4:23:34 PM #364:	I think Sarah stands a good chance at winning that F3 if she makes fire faster than Tony. I also think Natalie should've given up her necklace. The "wow" factor goes a long way, especially for someone who had only been in the main game for like 5 days. She did well to pull 4 votes but I think the right play was giving up the necklace and beating Tony at fire. I said it live before she lost and I still believe it -- that's the winning move. Understandable why she wouldn't though. She had confidence in herself to pull the win regardless, but oh well. --- https://imgur.com/6Lra0Xf https://imgur.com/fZbEYu0 <cite>Peridiam posted [p:939156384] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I think Sarah stands a good chance at winning that F3 if she makes fire faster than Tony. I also think Natalie should've given up her necklace. The "wow" factor goes a long way, especially for someone who had only been in the main game for like 5 days. She did well to pull 4 votes but I think the right play was giving up the necklace and beating Tony at fire. I said it live before she lost and I still believe it -- that's the winning move. Understandable why she wouldn't though. She had confidence in herself to pull the win regardless, but oh well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Naye745 05/14/20 4:25:43 PM #365:	for what it's worth, i think the crux of rob's argument was: if you're worried that tony is going to win that you want him out (and are clearly openly rooting for sarah), go do it yourself. the fact that he made it to the finals is on natalie's hands, so to speak. --- it's an underwater adventure ride <cite>Naye745 posted [p:939156505] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>for what it's worth, i think the crux of rob's argument was: if you're worried that tony is going to win that you want him out (and are clearly openly rooting for sarah), go do it yourself. the fact that he made it to the finals is on natalie's hands, so to speak. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/14/20 4:28:24 PM #366:	CoolCly posted... where the hell are the michelle votes Apparently Danni, Wendell, Adam, and Nick all said they were considering voting for Michele, but they didn't want to risk Natalie winning so they voted for Tony. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939156677] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>CoolCly posted... </cite> <quote>where the hell are the michelle votes</quote> Apparently Danni, Wendell, Adam, and Nick all said they were considering voting for Michele, but they didn't want to risk Natalie winning so they voted for Tony. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MartinFF7 05/14/20 4:38:09 PM #367:	I saw a screenshot from a news article somewhere claiming Tony created a fake idol (with the legit rules sheet from his real idol) that he gave to Sarah which is why it was Ben instead of her targeted at the final 5. ...just another scene that would've been nice to have, can always use more Tony antics. Also I forgot to mention this when it came on pages 1/2 but EOE Victoria is still one of my fav contestants from the past few seasons and yeah, really hope they bring her back for another go-around. Sooner rather than later. Without EOE. https://twitter.com/veebaamonde/status/1260729016744579073 <cite>MartinFF7 posted [p:939157201] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I saw a screenshot from a news article somewhere claiming Tony created a fake idol (with the legit rules sheet from his real idol) that he gave to Sarah which is why it was Ben instead of her targeted at the final 5. ...just another scene that would've been nice to have, can always use more Tony antics. Also I forgot to mention this when it came on pages 1/2 but EOE Victoria is still one of my fav contestants from the past few seasons and yeah, really hope they bring her back for another go-around. Sooner rather than later. Without EOE. https://twitter.com/veebaamonde/status/1260729016744579073 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/14/20 4:42:47 PM #368:	I saw an interview with Natalie where she said she voted out Denise instead of Sarah because she thought Sarah was more open to working with her. I don't know if that held true for the Ben vote. I'm not sure Natalie would buy a fake idol when Tony and Ben both played one at the previous tribal and she found the replacement. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939157446] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I saw an interview with Natalie where she said she voted out Denise instead of Sarah because she thought Sarah was more open to working with her. I don't know if that held true for the Ben vote. I'm not sure Natalie would buy a fake idol when Tony and Ben both played one at the previous tribal and she found the replacement. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/14/20 4:45:17 PM #369:	Mewtwo59 posted... Apparently Danni, Wendell, Adam, and Nick all said they were considering voting for Michele, but they didn't want to risk Natalie winning so they voted for Tony. Yeah Nick posted his full tribal testimonial on Instagram to explain why the edit made it seem like he voted for Michele. He said he really wanted to vote for her because she was his best friend on the island and he knows what it's like to play from the bottom, but Tony played the best game ever and he didn't want to cast his vote for who should get second place. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939157582] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Mewtwo59 posted... </cite> <quote>Apparently Danni, Wendell, Adam, and Nick all said they were considering voting for Michele, but they didn't want to risk Natalie winning so they voted for Tony.</quote> Yeah Nick posted his full tribal testimonial on Instagram to explain why the edit made it seem like he voted for Michele. He said he really wanted to vote for her because she was his best friend on the island and he knows what it's like to play from the bottom, but Tony played the best game ever and he didn't want to cast his vote for who should get second place. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/14/20 4:48:46 PM #370:	Underleveled posted... And I really truly do hate the sexism card, but even I can't deny that 80% of the last 15 seasons being won by men is problematic, and 100% of the winners since Me Too being male is particularly uncomfortable. On the other hand, you could just realize that you're being dramatic and it's not a big deal at all --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939157738] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Underleveled posted... </cite> <quote>And I really truly do hate the sexism card, but even I can't deny that 80% of the last 15 seasons being won by men is problematic, and 100% of the winners since Me Too being male is particularly uncomfortable.</quote> On the other hand, you could just realize that you're being dramatic and it's not a big deal at all </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/14/20 4:58:11 PM #371:	Natalie made pretty much the worst possible choice at firemaking. Either she should have put herself in it to take out Tony, or put Michele in Sarah's place. If she beats Tony, she has a much better chance at winning. If Michele beats Tony, Michele's chances improve somewhat but so do Natalie's. If Tony beats Michele, now you're in a final 3 with Tony and Sarah where they potentially split the votes and make your threshold for winning much lower. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939158262] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Natalie made pretty much the worst possible choice at firemaking. Either she should have put herself in it to take out Tony, or put Michele in Sarah's place. If she beats Tony, she has a much better chance at winning. If Michele beats Tony, Michele's chances improve somewhat but so do Natalie's. If Tony beats Michele, now you're in a final 3 with Tony and Sarah where they potentially split the votes and make your threshold for winning much lower. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/14/20 4:59:44 PM #372:	One last sidenote, I felt bad when "totally still getting a paycheck" essential worker Tony was talking about how his winnings would help with financial security in uncertain times in front of "definitely out of a job" bartender Michele --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939158366] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>One last sidenote, I felt bad when "totally still getting a paycheck" essential worker Tony was talking about how his winnings would help with financial security in uncertain times in front of "definitely out of a job" bartender Michele </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/14/20 5:00:40 PM #373:	Michele isn't a bartender anymore. The Survivor wiki says she's a business development manager now. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939158403] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Michele isn't a bartender anymore. The Survivor wiki says she's a business development manager now. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 05/14/20 5:18:15 PM #374:	I actually thought it came across as a bit more tone deaf when Tony's video showed him sitting with his back to a pretty lush-looking kitchen/dining room, while Natalie and Michele were at least up against walls. That was my initial thought when he started talking about financial hardships, at least. Like, I'm sure that two million is gonna go a long way, but like...it's like Brian Heidik's home video (no, not one of those) all over again. >_> --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:939159300] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I actually thought it came across as a bit more tone deaf when Tony's video showed him sitting with his back to a pretty lush-looking kitchen/dining room, while Natalie and Michele were at least up against walls. That was my initial thought when he started talking about financial hardships, at least. Like, I'm sure that two million is gonna go a long way, but like...it's like Brian Heidik's home video (no, not one of those) all over again. >_> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FFDragon 05/14/20 5:40:05 PM #375:	I mean, I get it, times are rough and all. But these people are all - by definition of playing the game this season - millionaires. --- If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? #theresafreakingghostafterus <cite>FFDragon posted [p:939160475] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I mean, I get it, times are rough and all. But these people are all - by definition of playing the game this season - millionaires. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
X_Dante_X 05/14/20 6:01:45 PM #376:	FFDragon posted... But these people are all - by definition of playing the game this season - millionaires. not necessarily! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQGWY0woy0 --- boring and mundane signature Now with more bold! Less Italics due to bold <cite>X_Dante_X posted [p:939161642] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>FFDragon posted... </cite> <quote> But these people are all - by definition of playing the game this season - millionaires.</quote> not necessarily! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQGWY0woy0 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 05/14/20 6:20:01 PM #377:	Survivor also pays a significant amount for 2nd and 3rd place. All of this season's contestants are probably doing fine financially. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:939162579] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Survivor also pays a significant amount for 2nd and 3rd place. All of this season's contestants are probably doing fine financially. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FFDragon 05/14/20 6:23:54 PM #378:	thanks, obama --- If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? #theresafreakingghostafterus <cite>FFDragon posted [p:939162764] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>thanks, obama </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Moonroof 05/14/20 8:38:45 PM #379:	Just when I thought I couldn't hate Sarah anymore, she goes and plays the gender card. And everybody ate it up and went along with it. Barf. Ben trolling Sarah to vote for him made zero sense. He clearly quit at that point and deserved to go home. Sarah voting for him made negative sense. She could've voted for literally anyone else. Sarah getting eliminated in the fire building challenge might have been the most satisfying result in Survivor history. Especially when she talked shit to Tony right before it began. Tony deserved to win. I felt bad that Michelle didn't have a single vote. Natalie did well to fight her way back but like Rob said, she needed to get rid of Tony. <cite>Moonroof posted [p:939169300] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Just when I thought I couldn't hate Sarah anymore, she goes and plays the gender card. And everybody ate it up and went along with it. Barf. Ben trolling Sarah to vote for him made zero sense. He clearly quit at that point and deserved to go home. Sarah voting for him made negative sense. She could've voted for literally anyone else. Sarah getting eliminated in the fire building challenge might have been the most satisfying result in Survivor history. Especially when she talked shit to Tony right before it began. Tony deserved to win. I felt bad that Michelle didn't have a single vote. Natalie did well to fight her way back but like Rob said, she needed to get rid of Tony. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CoolCly 05/15/20 12:47:28 AM #380:	Peridiam posted... I think Sarah stands a good chance at winning that F3 if she makes fire faster than Tony. I also think Natalie should've given up her necklace. The "wow" factor goes a long way, especially for someone who had only been in the main game for like 5 days. She did well to pull 4 votes but I think the right play was giving up the necklace and beating Tony at fire. I said it live before she lost and I still believe it -- that's the winning move. Understandable why she wouldn't though. She had confidence in herself to pull the win regardless, but oh well. I definitely think Sarah had a good shot of winning by beating Tony. I think her chances of winning against a Natalie or Michele that beat Tony is. I agree with Tim, putting Sarah up just seems bad on all fronts I have to think that if Natalie's confidence about beating Tony and fire, can you even go forward with that choice of doing it yourself? I like this meme https://i.redd.it/7k7cnzddysy41.jpg --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG <cite>CoolCly posted [p:939179440] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Peridiam posted... </cite> <quote>I think Sarah stands a good chance at winning that F3 if she makes fire faster than Tony. I also think Natalie should've given up her necklace. The "wow" factor goes a long way, especially for someone who had only been in the main game for like 5 days. She did well to pull 4 votes but I think the right play was giving up the necklace and beating Tony at fire. I said it live before she lost and I still believe it -- that's the winning move. Understandable why she wouldn't though. She had confidence in herself to pull the win regardless, but oh well.</quote> I definitely think Sarah had a good shot of winning by beating Tony. I think her chances of winning against a Natalie or Michele that beat Tony is. I agree with Tim, putting Sarah up just seems bad on all fronts I have to think that if Natalie's confidence about beating Tony and fire, can you even go forward with that choice of doing it yourself? I like this meme https://i.redd.it/7k7cnzddysy41.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/15/20 11:08:14 AM #381:	Moonroof posted... Just when I thought I couldn't hate Sarah anymore, she goes and plays the gender card. And everybody ate it up and went along with it. Barf. Ben trolling Sarah to vote for him made zero sense. He clearly quit at that point and deserved to go home. Sarah voting for him made negative sense. She could've voted for literally anyone else. Sarah getting eliminated in the fire building challenge might have been the most satisfying result in Survivor history. Especially when she talked shit to Tony right before it began. Tony deserved to win. I felt bad that Michelle didn't have a single vote. Natalie did well to fight her way back but like Rob said, she needed to get rid of Tony. As groan inducing as it was, I have to assume Ben figured out (probably from Natalie) that he was headed for 0 votes and a raking over the coals by the jury. I guess the difference between 5th place and 3rd place wasn't much for him amd it was worth it to avoid that while also helping Sarah's game. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939193934] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Moonroof posted... </cite> <quote>Just when I thought I couldn't hate Sarah anymore, she goes and plays the gender card. And everybody ate it up and went along with it. Barf. Ben trolling Sarah to vote for him made zero sense. He clearly quit at that point and deserved to go home. Sarah voting for him made negative sense. She could've voted for literally anyone else. Sarah getting eliminated in the fire building challenge might have been the most satisfying result in Survivor history. Especially when she talked shit to Tony right before it began. Tony deserved to win. I felt bad that Michelle didn't have a single vote. Natalie did well to fight her way back but like Rob said, she needed to get rid of Tony.</quote> As groan inducing as it was, I have to assume Ben figured out (probably from Natalie) that he was headed for 0 votes and a raking over the coals by the jury. I guess the difference between 5th place and 3rd place wasn't much for him amd it was worth it to avoid that while also helping Sarah's game. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/15/20 11:13:05 AM #382:	I don't understand Michele's narrative at all. Her entire story was about proving that she deserved the votes she got at FTC the first go round, then she gets there again and...gets no votes. I love her but it doesn't feel like she proved anything. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939194150] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I don't understand Michele's narrative at all. Her entire story was about proving that she deserved the votes she got at FTC the first go round, then she gets there again and...gets no votes. I love her but it doesn't feel like she proved anything. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CoolCly 05/15/20 11:34:00 AM #383:	Rob C said something like they set up a narrative reversal - first everyone thinks she didn't deserve her win, now she was robbed! --- The batman villians all seem to be one big joke that batman refuses to laugh at - SantaRPG <cite>CoolCly posted [p:939194971] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Rob C said something like they set up a narrative reversal - first everyone thinks she didn't deserve her win, now she was robbed! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 05/15/20 11:35:58 AM #384:	CoolCly posted... Rob C said something like they set up a narrative reversal - first everyone thinks she didn't deserve her win, now she was robbed! Yeah, but no one thinks she should've won...just that she should have come in second place over Natalie. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:939195042] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>CoolCly posted... </cite> <quote>Rob C said something like they set up a narrative reversal - first everyone thinks she didn't deserve her win, now she was robbed!</quote> Yeah, but no one thinks she should've won...just that she should have come in second place over Natalie. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/15/20 12:09:28 PM #385:	SavageInTheBox posted... As groan inducing as it was, I have to assume Ben figured out (probably from Natalie) that he was headed for 0 votes and a raking over the coals by the jury. I guess the difference between 5th place and 3rd place wasn't much for him amd it was worth it to avoid that while also helping Sarah's game. The funny thing was that it probably hurt Sarah more than it helped. If she votes out Michele there, Sarah has a virtually guaranteed spot in the final 3. The only situation I see where Sarah doesn't make it is if Natalie decides Ben is such a good goat that she has to bring him to the end, and I don't think she'd want that considering Sarah would get the credit for taking out Tony if she won. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939196476] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>SavageInTheBox posted... </cite> <quote>As groan inducing as it was, I have to assume Ben figured out (probably from Natalie) that he was headed for 0 votes and a raking over the coals by the jury. I guess the difference between 5th place and 3rd place wasn't much for him amd it was worth it to avoid that while also helping Sarah's game.</quote> The funny thing was that it probably hurt Sarah more than it helped. If she votes out Michele there, Sarah has a virtually guaranteed spot in the final 3. The only situation I see where Sarah doesn't make it is if Natalie decides Ben is such a good goat that she has to bring him to the end, and I don't think she'd want that considering Sarah would get the credit for taking out Tony if she won. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/15/20 2:46:00 PM #386:	I don't think it was about creating a path for Sarah to get to the end, it was about giving her a resume to beat Tony. A move she could call her own where Tony was left out of the loop. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939203895] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I don't think it was about creating a path for Sarah to get to the end, it was about giving her a resume to beat Tony. A move she could call her own where Tony was left out of the loop. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eaedwards6400 05/15/20 2:53:40 PM #387:	The point is that she's a good player and very much got to the end of the game on her own merit and like Ben and Sarah, she is happy with her performance and feels she deserved her win now. --- Cheer, Cheer for Old Notre Dame! GO VOTE FOR UCA! ~Join B8 on TEW!~ http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9339/7vke.jpg <cite>eaedwards6400 posted [p:939204269] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>The point is that she's a good player and very much got to the end of the game on her own merit and like Ben and Sarah, she is happy with her performance and feels she deserved her win now. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/15/20 2:55:56 PM #388:	Yeah but she has already gotten to the end before. Her getting to the end and getting no votes kinda vindicates the trolls. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939204398] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Yeah but she has already gotten to the end before. Her getting to the end and getting no votes kinda vindicates the trolls. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/15/20 3:00:39 PM #389:	SavageInTheBox posted... I don't think it was about creating a path for Sarah to get to the end, it was about giving her a resume to beat Tony. A move she could call her own where Tony was left out of the loop. That's the problem with "resume building". It wouldn't have mattered how well Tony played if Ben takes him out in fire. Ben was such a goat that even taking out Tony wouldn't have gotten him a vote, so Sarah gets all of the Tony votes and wins. It doesn't matter how good your game is if you don't even get to the final 3 in the first place, and Sarah forgot that. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939204618] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>SavageInTheBox posted... </cite> <quote>I don't think it was about creating a path for Sarah to get to the end, it was about giving her a resume to beat Tony. A move she could call her own where Tony was left out of the loop.</quote> That's the problem with "resume building". It wouldn't have mattered how well Tony played if Ben takes him out in fire. Ben was such a goat that even taking out Tony wouldn't have gotten him a vote, so Sarah gets all of the Tony votes and wins. It doesn't matter how good your game is if you don't even get to the final 3 in the first place, and Sarah forgot that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/15/20 3:59:59 PM #390:	Well yeah, but that's assuming Tony doesn't win F4 immunity. You can't be sure that Tony will end up making fire. And is Ben really a guaranteed fire making winner? I can't remember how dominant he was in his first season. Tony seemed pretty competent. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939207278] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Well yeah, but that's assuming Tony doesn't win F4 immunity. You can't be sure that Tony will end up making fire. And is Ben really a guaranteed fire making winner? I can't remember how dominant he was in his first season. Tony seemed pretty competent. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/15/20 6:23:59 PM #391:	My biggest doubt about Ben throwing in the towel because he thought he had no shot with the jury is that last time he was so good at winning the jury over that he managed to get votes from Joe, who he'd gotten into a screaming match with, Lauren, who he taunted after unilaterally voting out, and JP, whose two closest allies in the game were the other two finalists. Two million dollars seems enticing enough to try and repeat that. Don't get me wrong, he definitely threw in the towel, but I don't know if realizing he was the goat influenced that. --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939214247] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>My biggest doubt about Ben throwing in the towel because he thought he had no shot with the jury is that last time he was so good at winning the jury over that he managed to get votes from Joe, who he'd gotten into a screaming match with, Lauren, who he taunted after unilaterally voting out, and JP, whose two closest allies in the game were the other two finalists. Two million dollars seems enticing enough to try and repeat that. Don't get me wrong, he definitely threw in the towel, but I don't know if realizing he was the goat influenced that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bwburke94 05/15/20 11:14:33 PM #392:	I consider Ben more or less a quitter. --- Don't insult best girl Neopolitan. Especially you, ArcSys. <cite>bwburke94 posted [p:939227304] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I consider Ben more or less a quitter. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/15/20 11:20:05 PM #393:	I mean, he's basically in the same boat as Fairplay 2.0 however you consider that. --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939227498] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I mean, he's basically in the same boat as Fairplay 2.0 however you consider that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/16/20 2:31:01 AM #394:	SavageInTheBox posted... Well yeah, but that's assuming Tony doesn't win F4 immunity. You can't be sure that Tony will end up making fire. And is Ben really a guaranteed fire making winner? I can't remember how dominant he was in his first season. Tony seemed pretty competent. If Tony wins F4 immunity, then Sarah loses regardless. The last thing she needs is Tony to be able to say that he tied the immunity record in addition to everything else. But yeah, you're right that I'm overstating Ben's ability based on his fluke win over Devon. Everyone out there seemed scared to go against him in fire, but it's unclear if that's based off of reputation or if he really was that good at it. Underleveled posted... I mean, he's basically in the same boat as Fairplay 2.0 however you consider that. I'd say that Ian is a better comparison. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939233238] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>SavageInTheBox posted... </cite> <quote>Well yeah, but that's assuming Tony doesn't win F4 immunity. You can't be sure that Tony will end up making fire. And is Ben really a guaranteed fire making winner? I can't remember how dominant he was in his first season. Tony seemed pretty competent.</quote> If Tony wins F4 immunity, then Sarah loses regardless. The last thing she needs is Tony to be able to say that he tied the immunity record in addition to everything else. But yeah, you're right that I'm overstating Ben's ability based on his fluke win over Devon. Everyone out there seemed scared to go against him in fire, but it's unclear if that's based off of reputation or if he really was that good at it. Underleveled posted... </cite> <quote>I mean, he's basically in the same boat as Fairplay 2.0 however you consider that.</quote> I'd say that Ian is a better comparison. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/16/20 8:42:18 AM #395:	I've read that Ben was basically disrespected the entire game due to his reputation as a winner. He said early on he went to Jeremy to propose an alliance and while he was talking, Jeremy was rolling his eyes and making faces to production like "Can you believe this guy?" A lot of Survivor legends get pretty big egos so I find it pretty believable. 30+ days of that, plus working with Tony a lot of the way and getting none of the credit, probably gave Ben a pretty good idea he was getting dragged to FTC. I don't condone quitting but it seems like he had a pretty good reason to give up and try to help his friend. --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939239835] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I've read that Ben was basically disrespected the entire game due to his reputation as a winner. He said early on he went to Jeremy to propose an alliance and while he was talking, Jeremy was rolling his eyes and making faces to production like "Can you believe this guy?" A lot of Survivor legends get pretty big egos so I find it pretty believable. 30+ days of that, plus working with Tony a lot of the way and getting none of the credit, probably gave Ben a pretty good idea he was getting dragged to FTC. I don't condone quitting but it seems like he had a pretty good reason to give up and try to help his friend. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inviso 05/16/20 8:43:11 AM #396:	SavageInTheBox posted... I've read that Ben was basically disrespected the entire game due to his reputation as a winner. He said early on he went to Jeremy to propose an alliance and while he was talking, Jeremy was rolling his eyes and making faces to production like "Can you believe this guy?" A lot of Survivor legends get pretty big egos so I find it pretty believable. 30+ days of that, plus working with Tony a lot of the way and getting none of the credit, probably gave Ben a pretty good idea he was getting dragged to FTC. I don't condone quitting but it seems like he had a pretty good reason to give up and try to help his friend. Makes sense to me, given that we saw the same attitude displayed towards Michele. That sucks. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:939239857] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>SavageInTheBox posted... </cite> <quote>I've read that Ben was basically disrespected the entire game due to his reputation as a winner. He said early on he went to Jeremy to propose an alliance and while he was talking, Jeremy was rolling his eyes and making faces to production like "Can you believe this guy?" A lot of Survivor legends get pretty big egos so I find it pretty believable. 30+ days of that, plus working with Tony a lot of the way and getting none of the credit, probably gave Ben a pretty good idea he was getting dragged to FTC. I don't condone quitting but it seems like he had a pretty good reason to give up and try to help his friend.</quote> Makes sense to me, given that we saw the same attitude displayed towards Michele. That sucks. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/16/20 9:57:17 AM #397:	That story makes Jeremy's edit seem really fabricated, since the whole time the edit showed him being the one saying Ben won't even talk/listen to him. Would've been nice to have that context. This whole season, specifically Ben and Michele's acknowledgment of their reputations as "controversial" winners, really made me take a step back and reevaluate how harshly I've judged many Survivors over the years, other than ones like Dan who did totally inexcusable things or Will who is reportedly just as nasty IRL as he was on the show. --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939241882] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>That story makes Jeremy's edit seem really fabricated, since the whole time the edit showed him being the one saying Ben won't even talk/listen to him. Would've been nice to have that context. This whole season, specifically Ben and Michele's acknowledgment of their reputations as "controversial" winners, really made me take a step back and reevaluate how harshly I've judged many Survivors over the years, other than ones like Dan who did totally inexcusable things or Will who is reportedly just as nasty IRL as he was on the show. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SavageInTheBox 05/16/20 11:05:19 AM #398:	Sometimes these things show up in the edit. I remember Rupert acting really high and mighty after being cast as a "hero" and feeling like he had moral superiority over the "villains." --- TimJab <cite>SavageInTheBox posted [p:939244176] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Sometimes these things show up in the edit. I remember Rupert acting really high and mighty after being cast as a "hero" and feeling like he had moral superiority over the "villains." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 05/16/20 4:07:39 PM #399:	Yeah, those Heroes were awful. So glad the Villains won. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:939256769] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, those Heroes were awful. So glad the Villains won. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mewtwo59 05/16/20 5:12:31 PM #400:	Rupert always super played up whatever was the theme of the season. He was really into PI's pirate theme, and he sacrificed himself for his wife in BvW. That's just who Rupert is. --- ""Love" is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope." HK-47 <cite>Mewtwo59 posted [p:939259523] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Rupert always super played up whatever was the theme of the season. He was really into PI's pirate theme, and he sacrificed himself for his wife in BvW. That's just who Rupert is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/18/20 9:26:53 AM #401:	CBS actually released an official opening to WaW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIgOflMXQP0 To my knowledge, we're still stuck with the fan-made one of IoI. --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939335267] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>CBS actually released an official opening to WaW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIgOflMXQP0 To my knowledge, we're still stuck with the fan-made one of IoI. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Mana Sword 05/18/20 9:34:30 AM #402:	I think some of those clips are from their previous seasons? I feel like the Yul swimming one is, but I dont have encyclopedic knowledge of openings. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/Gylgamesh501.png <cite>The Mana Sword posted [p:939335483] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>I think some of those clips are from their previous seasons? I feel like the Yul swimming one is, but I dont have encyclopedic knowledge of openings. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
X_Dante_X 05/18/20 10:25:33 AM #403:	what do we even pay you for --- boring and mundane signature Now with more bold! Less Italics due to bold <cite>X_Dante_X posted [p:939336967] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>what do we even pay you for </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Underleveled 05/19/20 8:12:21 AM #404:	Four episodes through my TAR26 rewatch. Hmm, I'm wondering what happens with the winners. Because for some reason I had them last in my ranking, but couldn't remember anything about them other than that she looked kinda like a pudgy-faced Taylor Swift. And so far they're actually mildly likable. --- darkx <cite>Underleveled posted [p:939383695] in Survivor: ... [t:78664959]...</cite> <quote>Four episodes through my TAR26 rewatch. Hmm, I'm wondering what happens with the winners. Because for some reason I had them last in my ranking, but couldn't remember anything about them other than that she looked kinda like a pudgy-faced Taylor Swift. And so far they're actually mildly likable. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Board 8 > Survivor: Winners at War Topic 3: Only One Five-Day Week Left (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Survivor: Winners at War Topic 3: Only One Five-Day Week Left