Current Events > 1917 is not just the best picture of the year, it's possibly the best ever made.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Purely 01/11/20 4:43:47 PM #1:	I am in complete awe of what I just witnessed. It's like nothing else that has ever been made. An absolute masterpiece. <cite>Purely posted [p:932781844] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I am in complete awe of what I just witnessed. It's like nothing else that has ever been made. An absolute masterpiece. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 01/11/20 4:45:51 PM #2:	sounds like a huge overreaction --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:932781934] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>sounds like a huge overreaction </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JTilly 01/11/20 4:46:14 PM #3:	in theaters? should i go watch it? --- WittleJimmyJimmyjumper <cite>JTilly posted [p:932781947] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>in theaters? should i go watch it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 01/11/20 4:47:56 PM #4:	Movie really was great. Maybe not the best movie I've ever seen but one of the best war movies I've ever seen for sure. Second best movie of 2019 imo. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:932782001] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Movie really was great. Maybe not the best movie I've ever seen but one of the best war movies I've ever seen for sure. Second best movie of 2019 imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MachineJaipur 01/11/20 4:49:15 PM #5:	is it worth seeing in IMAX? <cite>MachineJaipur posted [p:932782061] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>is it worth seeing in IMAX? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#6	Post #6 was unavailable or deleted.
Purely 01/11/20 4:50:18 PM #7:	MachineJaipur posted... is it worth seeing in IMAX? Absolutely. I saw it in Dolby which is much better than IMAX. But yeah see it on whatever premium screen you can. <cite>Purely posted [p:932782102] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>MachineJaipur posted... </cite> <quote>is it worth seeing in IMAX?</quote> Absolutely. I saw it in Dolby which is much better than IMAX. But yeah see it on whatever premium screen you can. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 01/11/20 4:53:30 PM #8:	That screamed Oscar bait when I saw the trailer <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:932782237] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>That screamed Oscar bait when I saw the trailer </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MachineJaipur 01/11/20 4:57:56 PM #9:	cmiller4642 posted... That screamed Oscar bait when I saw the trailer isn't it that time of year though? <cite>MachineJaipur posted [p:932782435] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted... </cite> <quote>That screamed Oscar bait when I saw the trailer</quote>isn't it that time of year though? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/11/20 5:00:45 PM #10:	Paper_Okami posted... sounds like a huge overreaction Late in the movie I started tearing up because I was in such awe. The things they do, from a filmmaking standpoint, blew me away. If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is. <cite>Purely posted [p:932782546] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Paper_Okami posted... </cite> <quote>sounds like a huge overreaction</quote> Late in the movie I started tearing up because I was in such awe. The things they do, from a filmmaking standpoint, blew me away. If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 01/11/20 5:02:09 PM #11:	@Purely posted... If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is. You made a movie? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:932782608] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>@Purely posted... </cite> <quote>If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is.</quote> You made a movie? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 01/11/20 5:02:46 PM #12:	MachineJaipur posted... isn't it that time of year though? Yes, it just seemed like another pretentious late year release like The English Patient or Shakespeare in Love <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:932782640] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>MachineJaipur posted... </cite> <quote>isn't it that time of year though?</quote> Yes, it just seemed like another pretentious late year release like The English Patient or Shakespeare in Love </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 01/11/20 5:04:33 PM #13:	Purely posted... Late in the movie I started tearing up because I was in such awe. The things they do, from a filmmaking standpoint, blew me away. If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is. someone i get the feeling you haven't seen many movies --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:932782708] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote>Late in the movie I started tearing up because I was in such awe. The things they do, from a filmmaking standpoint, blew me away. If you've never made a movie, you probably can't understand how amazing it is.</quote> someone i get the feeling you haven't seen many movies </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 01/11/20 5:05:52 PM #14:	Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations. <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:932782757] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 01/11/20 5:14:36 PM #15:	It's not a pretentious snob movie at all. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:932783126] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>It's not a pretentious snob movie at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/11/20 5:17:11 PM #16:	cmiller4642 posted... Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations. Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes. <cite>Purely posted [p:932783227] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations.</quote> Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 01/11/20 5:18:24 PM #17:	Purely posted... Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes. Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1920 with British actors. It's been done to death <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:932783290] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote>Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes.</quote> Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1920 with British actors. It's been done to death </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bevan306 01/11/20 5:28:23 PM #18:	lol --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan https://imgur.com/5Ta28 <cite>bevan306 posted [p:932783743] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 01/11/20 5:28:46 PM #19:	cmiller4642 posted... Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1915 with British actors. It's been done to death holy shit take like 1 minute and look the synopsis up lmao <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:932783759] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted... </cite> <quote>Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1915 with British actors. It's been done to death</quote>holy shit take like 1 minute and look the synopsis up lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 01/11/20 5:29:23 PM #20:	cmiller4642 posted... Purely posted... Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes. Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1915 with British actors. It's been done to death Smh the movie was great. Roger Deakins did the cinematography. This Oscar bait nonsense doesn't always mean it's a shallow movie. This isn't like Two Popes. Saving Private Ryan was also Oscar bait and it was great. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:932783788] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote> Shittiest take goes to you. Being an incredible movie disqualifies it in your eyes.</quote> Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1915 with British actors. It's been done to death </quote> Smh the movie was great. Roger Deakins did the cinematography. This Oscar bait nonsense doesn't always mean it's a shallow movie. This isn't like Two Popes. Saving Private Ryan was also Oscar bait and it was great.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/11/20 5:31:00 PM #21:	cmiller4642 posted... Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1920 with British actors. It's been done to death Oh, nice edit. First you said to 1915, so now add some years so it actually fits in with when this film takes place. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a war film, nothing like the Queen Elizabeth period pieces you're referring to. It depicts a pivotal moment in the war and would blow your mind. <cite>Purely posted [p:932783854] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted... </cite> <quote>Incredible movie= one thing Fabricated with British accents and a period piece to get Oscar attention= another thing It's so generic to set a movie circa 1800-1920 with British actors. It's been done to death</quote> Oh, nice edit. First you said to 1915, so now add some years so it actually fits in with when this film takes place. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a war film, nothing like the Queen Elizabeth period pieces you're referring to. It depicts a pivotal moment in the war and would blow your mind. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
__aCEr__ 01/11/20 5:31:40 PM #22:	The name of the movie is "1917" and the dude still fucked up when the movie takes place. --- See you next Wednesday. <cite>__aCEr__ posted [p:932783881] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>The name of the movie is "1917" and the dude still fucked up when the movie takes place. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cmiller4642 01/11/20 5:33:00 PM #23:	Purely posted... Oh, nice edit. First you said to 1915, so now add some years so it actually fits in with when this film takes place. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a war film, nothing like the Queen Elizabeth period pieces you're referring to. It depicts a pivotal moment in the war and would blow your mind. What's the Clint Eastwood make Murican Trump supporters cry movie this year? <cite>cmiller4642 posted [p:932783940] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote>Oh, nice edit. First you said to 1915, so now add some years so it actually fits in with when this film takes place. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a war film, nothing like the Queen Elizabeth period pieces you're referring to. It depicts a pivotal moment in the war and would blow your mind.</quote> What's the Clint Eastwood make Murican Trump supporters cry movie this year? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/11/20 5:35:35 PM #24:	cmiller4642 posted... What's the Clint Eastwood make Murican Trump supporters cry movie this year? Richard Jewell, which is also really good. It won't be winning any Oscars. <cite>Purely posted [p:932784063] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted... </cite> <quote>What's the Clint Eastwood make Murican Trump supporters cry movie this year?</quote> Richard Jewell, which is also really good. It won't be winning any Oscars. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaldrenthebold 01/12/20 6:07:37 PM #25:	I just saw it today. It was fucking superb. The single take style really helps it and it feels like the most stressful and intense two hours you'll see. --- http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u223/chocolateFRESH/arts/kraid.png - Thanks GP cosmonaut! https://imgur.com/TuJWAR8 <cite>Kaldrenthebold posted [p:932834568] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I just saw it today. It was fucking superb. The single take style really helps it and it feels like the most stressful and intense two hours you'll see. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jerry_Hellyeah 01/12/20 6:18:01 PM #26:	Why not just fly? --- This is a cool sig <cite>Jerry_Hellyeah posted [p:932835018] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Why not just fly? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malfunction 01/12/20 6:20:18 PM #27:	Tc I trust your opinions on media even less than most people on CE <cite>Malfunction posted [p:932835111] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Tc I trust your opinions on media even less than most people on CE </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 01/12/20 6:22:39 PM #28:	Purely posted... saw it in Dolby which is much better than IMAX. Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:932835204] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote>saw it in Dolby which is much better than IMAX.</quote> Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 01/12/20 6:24:32 PM #29:	cmiller4642 posted... Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations. Are you one of those people who think anything that isn't a blockbuster franchise is snobby --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:932835297] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>cmiller4642 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah I'm not really a fan of pretentious snob movies that are made solely to get Oscar nominations. </quote> Are you one of those people who think anything that isn't a blockbuster franchise is snobby</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 01/12/20 6:28:19 PM #30:	"If the critics like it, then it must be pretentious bullshit designed to win shiny trophies" - uncultured swine --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:932835470] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>"If the critics like it, then it must be pretentious bullshit designed to win shiny trophies" - uncultured swine </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
brestugo 01/12/20 6:32:13 PM #31:	Death Stranding fans will love it. --- It's not about the size of the dog in the fight, it's about the size of the fight in the dog. <cite>brestugo posted [p:932835650] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Death Stranding fans will love it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:38:36 PM #32:	I Like Toast posted... Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax There are so few "true" IMAX screens now that this is a moot point. It's more just a brand. IMAX doesn't allow reclining seats still which automatically hurts it big time. In fact my friend was going to see it today but backed out when they realized IMAX doesn't have reclining seats. He's a dumbass for doing that though. <cite>Purely posted [p:932835935] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax</quote> There are so few "true" IMAX screens now that this is a moot point. It's more just a brand. IMAX doesn't allow reclining seats still which automatically hurts it big time. In fact my friend was going to see it today but backed out when they realized IMAX doesn't have reclining seats. He's a dumbass for doing that though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
billcom6 01/12/20 6:40:00 PM #33:	I've seen it, and no. It's very good. It's not that good. --- //constant loneliness// --- Steam and Fortnite: billcom6 My Teams: The Ohio State Buckeyes, New York Yankees, Buffalo Bills, The CBJ, Cavs <cite>billcom6 posted [p:932835992] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I've seen it, and no. It's very good. It's not that good. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:40:25 PM #34:	Malfunction posted... Tc I trust your opinions on media even less than most people on CE Well, for the past 2 years I've seen all the Oscar movies, and predicted the winners of all the major categories. I expect to do the same this year. 1917 will be sweeping best picture, director, cinematography, original soundtrack, sound recording, and sound mixing. <cite>Purely posted [p:932836011] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Malfunction posted... </cite> <quote>Tc I trust your opinions on media even less than most people on CE</quote> Well, for the past 2 years I've seen all the Oscar movies, and predicted the winners of all the major categories. I expect to do the same this year. 1917 will be sweeping best picture, director, cinematography, original soundtrack, sound recording, and sound mixing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doe 01/12/20 6:40:43 PM #35:	Roger Deakins has shot such films as Fargo and No Country For Old Men so I'm not surprised --- https://i.imgtc.ws/sQvRQV7.jpg https://imgtc.ws/i/lT4IPDD.png <cite>Doe posted [p:932836027] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Roger Deakins has shot such films as Fargo and No Country For Old Men so I'm not surprised </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 01/12/20 6:41:05 PM #36:	Purely posted... IMAX doesn't allow reclining seats still which automatically hurts it big time also not true, just stop posting, you're going to make people associate your inability with being accurate with thinking 1917 isn't great. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:932836048] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Purely posted... </cite> <quote>IMAX doesn't allow reclining seats still which automatically hurts it big time</quote> also not true, just stop posting, you're going to make people associate your inability with being accurate with thinking 1917 isn't great. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:44:36 PM #37:	I Like Toast posted... also not true, just stop posting, you're going to make people associate your inability with being accurate with thinking 1917 isn't great. Last I've seen, only a few IMAX theaters in the country have recliners. The CEO is against it because it means much less seats per theater. <cite>Purely posted [p:932836208] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>also not true, just stop posting, you're going to make people associate your inability with being accurate with thinking 1917 isn't great.</quote> Last I've seen, only a few IMAX theaters in the country have recliners. The CEO is against it because it means much less seats per theater. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 01/12/20 6:47:06 PM #38:	stop posting. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:932836320] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>stop posting. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Sonic 01/12/20 6:47:31 PM #39:	There is such a thing as too much praise. --- "It feels like I'm always wrong." "Nah, that's not true...I mean you just made that statement, didn't you?" <cite>Solid Sonic posted [p:932836332] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>There is such a thing as too much praise. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:48:25 PM #40:	I Like Toast posted... stop posting. Why don't you try to back up your claims? <cite>Purely posted [p:932836372] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>stop posting.</quote> Why don't you try to back up your claims? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 01/12/20 6:53:06 PM #41:	You literally said I was right both times Stop posting --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:932836565] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>You literally said I was right both times Stop posting </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:54:26 PM #42:	I Like Toast posted... You literally said I was right both times Stop posting I literally did not say that. You're just upset because you saw it in IMAX. I'm not hating, it's just a fact that Dolby is better and that's why it costs more. <cite>Purely posted [p:932836633] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>You literally said I was right both times Stop posting</quote> I literally did not say that. You're just upset because you saw it in IMAX. I'm not hating, it's just a fact that Dolby is better and that's why it costs more. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omnislasher 01/12/20 6:54:47 PM #43:	is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks. <cite>Omnislasher posted [p:932836649] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 6:59:53 PM #44:	Omnislasher posted... is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks. Nothing about this movie says that war isn't all bad. <cite>Purely posted [p:932836897] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Omnislasher posted... </cite> <quote>is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks.</quote> Nothing about this movie says that war isn't all bad. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omnislasher 01/12/20 7:00:57 PM #45:	sure, sure <cite>Omnislasher posted [p:932836946] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>sure, sure </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 01/12/20 7:10:32 PM #46:	Omnislasher posted... is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't all bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? No, if anything it's ~~saying war is pointless, random, and horrific~~ Purely posted... I literally did not say that You literally have Purely posted... You're just upset because you saw it in IMAX. I_Like_Toast created a new topic on Current Events, named "On my way to see 1917 in Dolby" 3 days ago stop posting Purely posted... it's just a fact that Dolby is better I Like Toast posted... Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax I Like Toast posted... stop posting. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:932837342] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>Omnislasher posted... </cite> <quote>is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't all bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments?</quote>No, if anything it's saying war is pointless, random, and horrific Purely posted... </cite> <quote> I literally did not say that</quote> You literally have Purely posted... </cite> <quote>You're just upset because you saw it in IMAX.</quote>I_Like_Toast created a new topic on Current Events, named "On my way to see 1917 in Dolby" 3 days ago stop posting Purely posted... </cite> <quote>it's just a fact that Dolby is better</quote> I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>Not always, IMAX laser is best picture quick and true IMAX does a higher screen ratio than dolby. But since there isn't consistently on what imax is, Dolby is better than many imax</quote> I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>stop posting.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 01/12/20 7:17:15 PM #47:	TC got Toasted --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:932837634] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>TC got Toasted </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purely 01/12/20 7:18:39 PM #48:	yemmy posted... TC got Toasted Toast is just a shit talker. He loves the movie too but he feels a need to argue with me. <cite>Purely posted [p:932837703] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>yemmy posted... </cite> <quote>TC got Toasted</quote> Toast is just a shit talker. He loves the movie too but he feels a need to argue with me. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
2SweetforTurtle 01/12/20 7:35:27 PM #49:	I just watched it. Beautifully shot, incredibly well acted, and well paced. It even made me shed a few tears. Probably my second favorite film of 2019, after Joker, although I can admit that this was better by just about all criteria (I just prefer Joker as I like superhero stuff) Omnislasher posted... is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks. wtf is wrong with you, lmao thats not the type of movie at all. --- Slow and steady wins the race <cite>2SweetforTurtle posted [p:932838452] in 1917 is no... [t:78322774]...</cite> <quote>I just watched it. Beautifully shot, incredibly well acted, and well paced. It even made me shed a few tears. Probably my second favorite film of 2019, after Joker, although I can admit that this was better by just about all criteria (I just prefer Joker as I like superhero stuff) Omnislasher posted... </cite> <quote>is it standard in that reminds us that war isn't <i>all</i> bad because some heroic ppl might get a chance to have an epic adventure and share deeply human emotional moments? yeah they almost all are. no thanks.</quote> wtf is wrong with you, lmao thats not the type of movie at all. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#50	Post #50 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > 1917 is not just the best picture of the year, it's possibly the best ever made. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 1917 is not just the best picture of the year, it's possibly the best ever made.