LogFAQs > #932222724

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topicanother year of tabletop rankings and writeups
SeabassDebeste
12/29/19 11:53:35 PM
#39:


128. Imperial Settlers (2014)

Category: Player vs Player
Genres: Civilization-building, tableau-building, card-drafting
Rules complexity (0 to 7): 4
Game length: 45-90 min
Experience: 2 plays (2015, 2018), 2-3 players
Previous ranks: 71/100 (2016), /80 (2018)

Summary - You're playing as one of four or five ancient civilizations. Rounds are split between drafting and playing. Cards can be either played or discarded.

Experience - My two plays of Imperial Settlers happened three years apart, but they were mostly the same - drafting is a little difficult; the game doesn't go quite long enough to build an engine; and the decisions don't "feel" particularly good.

Design -.Imperial Settlers is harmless enough: it's of a reasonable length, with reasonably nice art, with reasonable card effects, a reasonable drafting mechanic. But there's no singularly unique feature beyond possibly choosing which cards to build, and it bizarrely has this feel-bad "razing" mechanism, by which you can take down someone else's building.

Future - The relative freshness and possible promise of some depth/playing different factions makes playing it seem reasonably palatable. Would play possibly at 2 or 3, almost never at 4, but would look hard for other options.

---
yet all sailors of all sorts are more or less capricious and unreliable - they live in the varying outer weather, and they inhale its fickleness
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1