LogFAQs > #929809530

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	~~SephG's decennial "Best of" topic: the 2010s!~~
Nelson_Mandela 11/07/19 3:32:37 PM #17:	Bootyhole posted... As much as I truly hate the Patriots and you could argue about some super bowl wins (the earlier ones) theres no way they arent the best dynasty probably in sports ever. The 2010s were the encore presentation. The consistency of their winning percentages and playoff stats don't lie. 5 SBs I believe and winning 3 of them? Old man Brady setting like every playoff as well as SB record in the process that will almost undoubtedly mever be touched by another QB ever. The Pats would have a single title this decade if not for two unprecedented meltdowns by their opponents. The Warriors may not have had that long of a window, but they were truly unbeatable for a time. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:929809530] in ~~SephG's ... [t:78142245]...</cite> <quote>Bootyhole posted...</cite> <quote>As much as I truly hate the Patriots and you could argue about some super bowl wins (the earlier ones) theres no way they arent the best dynasty probably in sports ever. The 2010s were the encore presentation. The consistency of their winning percentages and playoff stats don't lie. 5 SBs I believe and winning 3 of them? Old man Brady setting like every playoff as well as SB record in the process that will almost undoubtedly mever be touched by another QB ever. </quote> The Pats would have a single title this decade if not for two unprecedented meltdowns by their opponents. The Warriors may not have had that long of a window, but they were truly unbeatable for a time. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1