LogFAQs > #913802770

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What particular statements by Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson make them alt righ
Anti-245 12/09/18 12:10:29 AM #100:	TheMikh posted... Marx used communist and socialist interchangeably in his day. Contemporary socialists and communists do not. Communists were not the only socialists in the 19th Century, and socialists were most certainly not entirely communists; there were many schools of socialism that emerged during that century. Communism was but one of them, and it was intrinsically applied - on paper, anyway - Marxist thought. And have you actually read the manifesto? Because most of the things he proposes most nations have anyway and they're certainly not communist or even socialist(which is how he used it). The proposals are not intrinsically communist, but anyone can make hollow proposals that reflect more universal concerns. The devil is in the details of execution - which, to my vague recollection, the manifesto was lacking with respect to. Exactly, so why are we talking about communism again? The manifesto gives answer to several questions some of which are extremely detailed. The demands of the communist party of Germany are listed near the end and as I said most nations already have them, which they would considering that times have changed. If they are not intrinsically communist (not sure what this means) then the term "communist" is irrelevant. --- Life in the DoB. <cite>Anti-245 posted [p:913802770] in What parti... [t:77271679]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheMikh posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Marx used communist and socialist interchangeably in his day. Contemporary socialists and communists do not.</quote> Communists were not the only socialists in the 19th Century, and socialists were most certainly not entirely communists; there were many schools of socialism that emerged during that century. Communism was but one of them, and it was intrinsically applied - on paper, anyway - Marxist thought. <quote>And have you actually read the manifesto? Because most of the things he proposes most nations have anyway and they're certainly not communist or even socialist(which is how he used it).</quote> The proposals are not intrinsically communist, but anyone can make hollow proposals that reflect more universal concerns. The devil is in the details of execution - which, to my vague recollection, the manifesto was lacking with respect to.</quote> Exactly, so why are we talking about communism again? The manifesto gives answer to several questions some of which are extremely detailed. The demands of the communist party of Germany are listed near the end and as I said most nations already have them, which they would considering that times have changed. If they are not intrinsically communist (not sure what this means) then the term "communist" is irrelevant. --- Life in the DoB.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1