LogFAQs > #938535027

Corrik7 posted...

I accused you of being skeptical of claims and defending allies of your causes in relation to claims made with zero evidence.

I accused you of blindly believing claims and supporting consequences to be had in relation to claims made with zero evidence against people you view as a foe, enemy, or "evil".

Yes.

You can take that where you want to. Not a single person is going to defend their ally if there literal ally is caught raping someone or something.

But, if there is not proof and plausible deniability, many in this topic would take it and run with it when convenient and the opposite vice versa.

yes. and again, you are not like this. you are completely impartial, fair and neutral, unlike me. so do you get why you're saying you're morally superior to me now?

No one said you support rape. News at 11 a liberal in this topic twisted an argument to the nth degree to make it sound radical.

how else am i supposed to interpret "if bernie got accused of rape, you would defend him"? according to you, if a woman accused bernie, my response would be "lol obviously she's lying bernie agrees with me politically so he's automatically a saint and he would never rape anyone."

---

Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta