LogFAQs > #886695556

@Zeeak4444 posted...

@Mal_Fet posted...

Zeeak4444 posted...

Please enlighten me where I'm wrong because in my state law enforcement aren't supposed to unload a suspects weapon because its tampering with fucking evidence.

I'm rather certain you're wrong.

You're the one claiming that's tampering with evidence, so how about you prove it?

http://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/crime-scene-procedures.html

Here's a basic overview. What you're saying is the shooting officer should be treated as a criminal investigator. That's false, there's a reason they're supposed to call the detectives. There's nothing specifically saying they can't because that falls under basic tampering of evidence.

I don't know if your just assuming he's allowed or what but that's the facts of my state. Like I said idk about that one but I'd laugh if it's any different.

So what I've gathered here is there's no indication that an officer unloading a gun for safety purposes qualifies as tampering evidence in any of the relevant parts of that link, and your vagueness in your response here probably means you didn't even bother to look into your own source to even see if you were right or wrong.

Is that right?
---

Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
-George Orwell