LogFAQs > #878909175

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhy isn't male circumcision condemned as much as female circumcision is?
meingott
05/11/17 3:29:55 PM
#212:


Hadoken92 posted...
meingott posted...

Hadoken92 posted...
All skin has nerve endings and all skin serve multiple functions, this isn't limited to the foreskin (which by itself isn't an organ, btw). I'm mostly asking about where you get the Oxytocin Absorption claim from.


it doesn't matter that all skin has nerve endings. that's irrelevant. holy fuck. the point was that the foreskin serves a purpose. it's rich in nerve endings, especially for the surface area compared to other skin. it protects the glans, has a gliding function during intercourse, etc. yeah, it's not an organ - what i was getting at is that it's more than just a flap of skin.

http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/

as for the oxytocin thing, i don't remember where i read that. not finding anything on that anymore :/


That website hasn't been updated since 2007 and cites laughable studies (seriously, look at the sample size of some of them).
With respect to the anatomy and function, all it proves is that foreskin is skin. Congrats.

And the Oxytocin thing, the reason you're not finding anything on it is because it's BS.

Stop trying to post your opinions like they're facts and stop trying to support your poor opinion irrelevant things.


> "stop posting your opinions as facts and stop trying to support poor opinions"

> literally handwaves away the functions of foreskin as if it's simply a flap of skin, just because it has the word "skin" in foreskin

lmao
---
meingott
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1