LogFAQs > #981075021

King_Rial posted...

No, we literally haven't. With all due respect, I will take a legal scholar's analysis over yours. Even if you don't like his, I think it is illogical to dismiss it without actual legal knowledge that can prove to ignore his position.

I'm just sharing with everyone a position that has been put forth. While you certainly don't have to take it as gospel (it wasn't presented that way anyway), at least take it under consideration.

Here is one of the times he breaks down what that would look like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEnvR1VrJaI

I hope this isn't the outcome, but it is a legal possiblity.

I mean assuming we know how conservative judges will decide cases is pretty asinine, so putting your faith behind a twitter or youtube star is kind of silly. Do you also put your portfolio in the hands of Jim Cramer?

I'm just saying putting this much stock into what someone says is pretty silly. Plenty of other 'legal experts' have said they'll do things different.

As we're on a message board, personally I think they'll just do the absolute worst thing, then tell us to fuck ourselves, like they've done with 90% of their decisions since 2021.