Lurker > bkilla

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


You respond as if you think it's ok to ban "Biden thought", you know, the guy who supports trans and gay rights, the guy who's forgiving student debt. He isn't Trump, yet he would be banned.

CSCA33 posted...

Lol, as if you wouldn't relish the idea of Biden being banned from gamefaqs.

How long did trump last on twitter before he was finally banned and then unbanned? A sitting President is treated different when it comes to social media.

Don't you think it's weird that you would ban any Western leader if they said what they thought about the Gaza situation? You're stuck in a bubble.

CSCA33 posted...

Lol, as if you wouldn't relish the idea of Biden being banned from gamefaqs.

How long did trump last on twitter before he was finally banned and then unbanned? A sitting President is treated different when it comes to social media.

I voted for Trudeau. Lots of us exist.

You know you've gone too far when Biden and Trudeau would be banned here. lmao

I was modded though. For a view that the UN is debating right now. For a view that almost all western governments agree with. If I was from Israel I wouldn't be able to speak my mind here since most Israelis agree with the war. If Biden posted here on whether there is genocide in Gaza, he'd be banned. Keep that in mind. Oh well.

MabusIncarnate posted...

Shut the fuck up fascist

"Anyone who disagrees with me (half of the world) is a fascist!" lmao. See how far that'll get you. Oh wait, we did see how far when Trump was elected the first time because people didn't like Hillary as much as they liked Bernie. The young Turks were going to protest Hillary after she won! I wonder how much damage they've done to women because they were upset. Thankfully I don't live in the U.S, but Trump is heading your way soon if you keep up with these silly purity tests.

Yes, it's obvious. Common views held by half the world are moderated here.

So why is it that poc that go against the system and are successful are seen as lesser people or not their race? I don't get that. It seems like it's a problem inside the poc community that needs to be addressed..

Blacks (such as myself) from Jamaica, Nigeria, and South Sudan do quite well in North America--just as well as the Irish. Centrists/right-leaning Liberals (such as myself) are always looked down on for not supporting every idiotic idea the far-left pushes out. This type of disrespect is fostered on us primarily by middle-class, left-wing whites in my experience, not other blacks.

I love it. Take them for all of their money.

IShall_Run_Amok posted...

Golly, they sure fooled us all those times they said they wanted to commit genocide.

Thank you for saying "wanted to", implying that no genocide has taken place.

IShall_Run_Amok posted...

Head canon: he knows what the definition is and is purposefully obfuscating it to support Israel

Israel's goal isn't to kill all Palestinians, it's to destroy Hamas. Civilian casualties aren't genocide. Calling it so is disrespectful to the groups who have endured such suffering. I implore you to look up the definition and pay attention to the "intent" part of genocide.

Trumble posted...

Still a more intelligent point than anything you've posted here.

Oh no, another mean comment.

NoMeLx22x posted...

That's quite literally not how genocides work.

You dont need to wipe out an entire population to consider it a genocide, unless of course you just want to ignore the Holocaust. Or the Armenian genocide. Or any other one throughout history. Those populations still exist.

Read the fucking definition of genocide before you keep posting utter nonsense

My god you people. I meant "attempted genocide". This is not how it works. Israel's goal isn't to kill as many Palestinians as possible. If that were the case, they could have. Intentions matter.

DrizztLink posted...

You're an actual moron.

Name calling?

Trumble posted...

And if Israel win this war, most if not all of the Palestinians will be killed or displaced.

Hence, bad guy vs bad guy.

The only good guys (not including third parties not directly involved but trying to push for a ceasefire) are the Israeli and Palestinian civilians.

I highly doubt that. You do know that 20% of Israel is Arab Muslim? That they are free and WANT to live there. That a former Prime Minister of Israel was sent to prison by an arab Muslim Supreme Court justice in Israel, right?

DrizztLink posted...

And Israel is quite literally perpetuating a campaign of genocide that you're at best utterly dismissive of.

If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could have killed every living thing in Gaza without losing one life. That's how genocides work. The Gazan population has nearly tripled in the last 30 years.

Trumble posted...

The important details you're missing is that just because Germany were beyond a doubt bad guys, doesn't mean anyone fighting against them is automatically good guys. War can be, and often is, two bad guys (one of whom very well may be worse than the other, but both still bad) rather than a good guy and a bad guy. Even when one side has a legitimate reason to fight a war, they can still be the bad guys depending on their conduct in it. One of the few exceptions to come to mind is the Russia-Ukraine war, where Ukraine are definitely good guys (at least so far; that would change if they started targeting or disregarding Russian civilians).

If Japan or Germany had won the war, the entire world would have been one big prison (death)/forced labor camp. Since the Allies won, Germany and Japan thrived through loans and development. It's easy to see who "the bad guys are/were". If Hamas were to win this war, all gays in Israel would be murdered, women would be forced into sex slavery, and many millions more would be killed just for being Jews. And that is the difference.

Zoks posted...

Do you just parrot what you saw on Reddit and think it's true? Jordan unlike the rest of the countries naturalized most of the Palestinian refugees. What is always getting kicked out is not the Palestinian people, but the PLO, who were a militant group at the time. Generally speaking you don't want a militia hell bent on starting a war with another country that you do not want to start in your borders. As for Lebanon and Egypt, each have their own reasons for not wanting Palestinians. Lebanon because they have their own delicate power balance to maintain, and a foreign population would not help, and Egypt because they have overpopulation concerns as it is. Or do you not know about the Ethiopia/Egypt beef that's going on? Egypt cannot take in massive Palestinian refugees.

Maybe because Palestinians supported Saddam Hussain during his invasion of Kuwait, supported the attempted revolution in Jordan and killing of their king, and supported Muslim brotherhood terrorism in Egypt and Lebanon? Could it be for those reasons? hmm...

DnDer posted...

Sorry, what?

You're deliberately misrepresenting statistics about that.

SOURCE: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gazans-back-two-state-solution-rcna144183

That's a new poll. Good to see support falling.

DrizztLink posted...

Oooh, are we comparing body counts and atrocities?

Because that's not going to go well for you.

The body count is often irrelevant. As someone said (can't remember), "many more Germans civilians died (at the hands of the British) in WW2 than British civilians. That doesn't mean the British were the bad guys during that conflict. And as I said, 50-70% of Palestinians support Oct 7th and Hamas.

Ricemills posted...

You're just want to absolve Israel responsibility on this war

Hamas has:

1-Killed 1200
2-**ped dozens of women and girls
3-Took hostages
4-50-70% support Hamas

What did you think would happen? This is a war.

SHRlKE posted...

Why should they need to though? Why should Palestinians need to flee their own fucking homeland. Imagine the furore if someone suggested Israelis should evacuate Israel to escape from Hamas. Its completely obscene.

I was speaking to the assumption many make that only Israel controls Gazan borders, not whether Palestinians ought to be forced out of their land.

Zoks posted...

Egypt doesn't decide what goes in and out Gaza, Israel does. That means Israel controls the border. Now can Egypt "control" the border? Sure, if they are willing to risk a war with Israel because they don't want certain things going into Gaza.

Israel and Egypt work together to control the Muslim Brotherhood offshoot "Hamas". No Musliim majority country wants Palestinians in their country (Jordan, SA, Lebanon etc.) and especially not Egypt.

Foppe posted...

Israel controls the borders so you kinda need to work with them if you want to send in 200+ aid trucks daily.

Egypt has a border too. Let's be accurate. Anyways, Hamas has rejected another ceasefire offer (6 weeks, 40 Israelis for 700 terrorist exchange), so the Rafah incursion should be starting soon.

Cheater87 posted...

Of course not!

Nor should they.

Time to release the hostages.