What do you doIf I recall, he's like a corrections officer? I think he's currently working Juvi, if I'm not mistaken.
iirc that happened when he tried to quit it rightNo. It eventually deteriorates the user until you die a painful death. Until a counter agent was created.
They look gross in the commercials... Like hockey pucks.And it was.
History was made at Subaru Park on Wednesday night as homegrown midfielder Cavan Sullivan became the youngest player to make his regular-season debut among the top North American professional sports leagues.
Sullivan's historic debut comes at 14 years, 293 days old when he took to the pitch in the 85th minute of the Union's match against New England Revolution. Sullivan breaks the record by 13 days held by Freddy Adu who was 14 years and 306 days old.
Sullivan signed a MLS record deal with the Union on May 9, 2024, which made him the youngest player in club history to be added to the first team roster, and the fifth youngest player to sign a first-team contract in MLS history. Since his signing, the 14-year-old has made five start swith Philadelphia Union II in MLS NEXT Pro and has scored in each of his last two matches.
My friend from grade school who was considered a familyOh, shit man. Sorry to hear that.
https://twitter.com/sanguisugabogg/status/1809951140420722841
Why does he look like Ben Affleck's long lost brother?https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a04e6967.jpg
I'm sure it'll be back up soonHopefully, but it's been down for nearly 3 hours now. Which I know isn't a ton of time, but as an entitled gamer, that is not an insignificant amount of time.
I mean assuming we know how conservative judges will decide cases is pretty asinine, so putting your faith behind a twitter or youtube star is kind of silly. Do you also put your portfolio in the hands of Jim Cramer?Here is a another article backing up that same line of thought.
I'm just saying putting this much stock into what someone says is pretty silly. Plenty of other 'legal experts' have said they'll do things different.
As we're on a message board, personally I think they'll just do the absolute worst thing, then tell us to fuck ourselves, like they've done with 90% of their decisions since 2021.
I mean, cool story and all, but we've already been there and done that.No, we literally haven't. With all due respect, I will take a legal scholar's analysis over yours. Even if you don't like his, I think it is illogical to dismiss it without actual legal knowledge that can prove to ignore his position.
Trump's argument is absolute immunity, not selective immunity.That doesn't really matter to certain Justices. And to be clear, this is the analysis of a former federal prosecutor, not my own. This is an outcome that Glenn Kirschner believes they can take to further delay the trial.
Lower courts already ruled against it. That's how it got here.I think you need to reread my post.
That's when we got the 'President can have his political adversaries assassinated as long as they don't get impeached and removed from office' quote.