My 17 minute drive to work would turn into an hour plus commute of walking and taking buses for no reasonHey I found the reason:
So again, Id rather just drive a car imo. Even if I lived in this ideal walkable utopia. Privacy of my car, control of my climate, and you arent waiting on anyoneGood news: the more alternatives there are to cars as a mode of transportation, the less traffic you'll have to deal with as someone who likes driving.
Policing will always exist.That's a bold claim about a system that's less than 200 years old.
I just think cities are miserable. I'd rather be in nature when I get back from workCars are a big part of the misery; they're noisy, dangerous, worsen air quality.
No, sorry, I simply don't believe it will be. If Democracy ever fails in this country, it won't be by the hands an obese, failed businessman and his cult of poorly educated followers.It is actually hard to imagine a type more suited for the task.
Search engines and large language models aren't really comparable in that wayGoogle was placing output from their large language model at the top of results for their search engine.
It also kind of goes against the entire concept of using AI/large language models if you just tell it what to say.Is that concept good? Like, when you Google something, or ask something of your computer, do you want it to guess? Is that something other users want, or expect from the Google search bar?
i know people online complain about this a lot but i have literally never run into this, and ive matched/chatted with a lot of people, particularly recentlyI think it really depends what apps you use. I never encountered it on Hinge, but I hear Tinder is much more of a minefield in this regard.
of course, what they really should have done is not released the product at allCorrect. The FTC would demand a recall of a product this disastrous from any other field.
If Democrats want to keep winning and actually convert Republicans and fence sitters then the unfortunate reality is they need to keep a firm, conservative grip on immigration.People with conservative views on this subject are consuming conservative media that will lie to them about it. They'll never know.
uhhh whatIt's a violation of UN treaties the US has signed, arbitrary in ways that will delight a future Republican administration, and harmful to people with no clear political benefit.
isn't this terrible? why aren't people mad?
huh?The league spent 100 years distancing itself from the gambling industry, for this exact reason, and turned around to slather themselves in ads and partnerships for Draftkings and BetMGM.
No, if Trump were president, he'd shut down the free press.Well,
businesses wont care so long as AI is less than 1% the cost of a humanGiven the costs of computing and the costs of cleaning up after AI's mistakes, this may be further away than it seems.
They freaking charge daily for parking. Parking. Like do people usually walk to your hotelWhat city are you staying in?
I don't see the point of making such a blatantly false report like we can't all see what's happening for ourselves.Well a lot of people believed the WMDs and it meant they could do the thing they wanted to do
This is like when Bush was saying that there were WMDs in Iraq.
This is some mental gymnastics. They have months to hammer it home. The day of victory lap isn't required because it gives the opponent ammo to say "look he is responsible!"You cannot create a reality they won't lie about. You can only make your reality more heard.
Republicans have spent the whole trial saying this was Biden's doing. They're actually smart not to come out and do a victory lap because Biden had nothing to do with any of it.It's not smart to have Americans watch the news and only hear what Republicans have to say about it. Scandals are hammered home through repitition.
He can't put his re-election at risk if people vote in their best interestsI've been known to gamble from time to time. But betting on the American people to conceptualize their best interests in a rational way, when democracy is at stake? That's too rich for my blood, personally.
Because they 1) buy their ingredients in bulk, and so can leverage economies of scale to their advantage, and 2) use cheaper ingredients than you can buy in the stores.These are the same point said twice.
If you know your actions/words will lead to one singular outcomeWould it be fair to apply this logic to Biden letting Israel lead him around by the tail? A lot of people are putting a lot of scrutiny on the rhetoric of critics and protestors but the president's actions have basically infinitely more influence over who will vote for him in November. Harangue him!
How was the total amount of people surveyed 138%?Those are two separate questions.
Sixty-three percent of those surveyed agreed fast food should be cheaper than eating at home, but 75% say that is not the case.