I dunno why this post was ignored. But for yall who are claiming Well, they are chuds by definitionHere's the true difference: they don't like fat shaming and they do like chud shaming. It's actually that simple
What about calling a fat person fat? Is that flaming, or no?
What's the difference?
Why is someone "looking like an sjw" consider a bad thing? What is wrong with being an "sjw"?You're kinda undermining your own position on why "chud" isn't flaming. If there's nothing wrong with being an sjw, what's the problem with calling someone one? Like you said about chud, it's just a descriptor. A positive one, even, by your own admission. So it certainly shouldn't be considered flaming if "chud" isn't.
you only started trying to qualify your bad opinion with 'hair' after getting called out for it. again, you are a trump cultist and aren't fooling anyoneVery first post where I mentioned "sjw", bud. I see why I have you tagged as "dishonest loon"
is this because of that "Shut the fuck up, chud" post that got deleted?That happened?
fair next
not too late to unfridge a 2k3 account to post something yer chicken to post on main thoYou have more AMP than karma, thoughbeit
that isn't what you said and you aren't fooling anyone. the above post i just quoted is the first post you used 'sjw hair',
Describing someone as looking like an sjw because their hair is blue
correct. when you mock someone for their hair you are mocking their hair, when you call them a sjw you are mad that they aren't racist/bigotsSaying someone has sjw hair isn't saying that you want them to be racist. You're making several large leaps
I mean if I were American Id reluctantly vote for that white geriatric racist over the other one, but Id want more choice. Amazing they even clash so much since they barely differ. My country has over 300 parties, with 20ish actually in the government/opposition, and even they can collaborate more. The far left animal party regularly works together with the most far right nazi party, and Im not talking about the meme internet use of nazi but actual skullmeasuring, antisemite, white supremacists.That's amazing. It's a wonder anything at all is ever done in America because our congress is usually split 50/50 roughly and each side thinks the other is comprised of actual demons
The prevalence of translation inaccuracies is true. It's not that difficult to compare a line of Japanese dialogue side by side with the English script.People like to conflate intent bastardization with "certain things are inevitably lost in translation" because the latter is an easier position to defend. Everyone knows japanese has turns of phrase, etc. that don't translate.
if you were making fun of their hair color you would mention that instead of that you think they don't like racism. when chuds use 'sjw' its obviously meant as 'someone who doesn't hate like i do'Saying someone's hair is blue and laughing isn't the same as saying you would rather they be racist, wtf are you on about
nothing you are doing in this topic or that one right now is impressive, i can thoroughly assure youNow you're just being nasty
lmfao, this dude over here is bringing his meltdown about this to other threads now:Wow you're really on the ball, that was less than two minutes between this post and that. If you're trying to impress me, it's working
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80710006/979136267
European citizens cannot vote in US elections.Oh, lol. The way you put it suggested to me you're choosing not to, not unable to.
Itz funny cuz Asmongold has taken 2 political tests and he always lands somewhere in the Libetarian left side.Not surprising, "Chud" literally just means "anyone to the right of me" at this point
Not even voting Biden myself.Interesting. Why not? Does it have to do with his supporting Israel?
Politics isnt part of my list, its mostly people complaining about Aloy.I've participated in such discussions on the side of her looking bad in Horizon 2 so I'm even more surprised I'm not on there now.
when the logical extrapolation of what someone means by 'sjw' is 'someone who doesn't like bigotry/injustice' it starts to look p sketch.Making fun of such people, given how ridiculous some of them are, isn't even bigotry in itself. Certainly poking fun at someone's hair color qualifies as such even less.
I use it more to know what person Im dealing with, its my only tag.The fuck? Where am I on this?
I brought up trump because you brought up republicans. Let's not pretend that maga hasn't largely taken over the party and has the most support. Trump IS the republican party at this point.I get that you don't want to engage with the argument but I'll just quickly point out that it's just a fact that not all republican voters are willing to support trump, I specifically know older republicans who never will support him after jan 6.
Of course you wouldn't. Being against republicans isn't a bigoted position. Being pro trump is naturally a bigoted position.I didn't mention Trump, you added that. But it's not bigoted being against furries either. Or the Souls fanbase. Similarly, saying someone with blue hair looks like an sjw isn't bigoted.
I hope this helps.Are you the same person who did this in the other thread too? It's a strange gimmick. If you can't address my argument you don't have to.
Then use it in a way that isn't a slur or bigotedThose two descriptors typically exclude any part of a person that's done themselves at their own discretion, i.e. voting republican. You wouldn't be called a bigot for being against republicans.
SJW is always used in a bigoted way, so it gets rightfully moderated.No it isn't
Just because you wish that doesn't really make it true.Wow you really don't see it. That's wild
There's just a thing sort of like snowflake in which right-wingers think saying "no u" means that they win.The unfortunate thing is that you probably don't realize on any level that this is what you actually just literally did
"cuck" is not the "left-wing equivalent" of chudOf course it is. Chud = right winger, cuck = left winger. That's literally how the words are used by the respective sides.
Am I the only one who's going to at least acknowledge this post?Lol, apparently.
Hell no. Its been all fan fiction with scenes like Chief going to dinner with some random family and they ask him for his KD Ratio.Lmao you can't be serious
Carrol O'Connor was very liberal (the scene where Sammy Davis Jr kisses Archie was in fact Carrol's idea).Never seen that one but All In The Family is a liberal show in general. It wouldn't fly today because of no-no words, etc. but the character of Archie was always clearly meant to demonstrate the folly of the fuddy duddy who can't get with the times
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/0d9c7317.jpgThose shows are both great tbf
There's a few around me and they are just normal people for the most part.Pretty much this. They aren't all rabid animals like the jan 6ers, etc.
how nazis don't just get their ass kicked at all times is mind boggling to meWould you kick one's ass if you were near them? If not then there's your answer.
Conservatives at minimum are supporting a rapist who paraphrases HitlerThat's not even true, I know a couple who said outright they won't support trump again after jan 6
I don't see anything wrong with itThe stipulation isn't needed, then. If they're that closed-minded then they wouldn't be willing to date you if you aren't conservative, anyway.
Conservatives are by definition closed-minded
Hope this helps!There's nothing wrong with having preferences, it's just funny to have "open mindedness" as a value moments after saying a broad class of people with very varied beliefs within it are all disqualified. Those two things separately are cool but together it comes off pretty funny.
2) Not conservative. (In fact does not share bigoted views or opinions. Is open mindedLol I love it
There is a different one that shows a girl getting up to check on a man. And people are mad cause they think its pressuring women and girls to go talk to strange menWhy do some folk seem to think women = children
So, can we call them what they are yet?Where have you been? That rule hasn't been in effect in months
exactly. The immediate jump into thinking that that was what I meant is exactly the issue. This user has on numerous occasions made it clear that they think the only way to get a women is to have moneyNo, it's just that when you say women can work now and be independent and therefore men should rise to their new standards, my mind goes to money and education, naturally. That sounds like it's what you're talking about, especially given that women usually prefer someone with their education level or better.
hence why I sarcasticallly asked them if they thought that men just buy women
"Casual sex is a low ask" said the user who doesn't have to roll the dice on becoming pregnant.That's fair but contraceptives exist. The fact is that women find that risk acceptable all the time...what the fuck man is gonna go through college and get into debt just to get laid? Acting like that's a normal thing to expect men to do is just funny to me
lmao no you havent. Youve spent all thread pointing out that women want rich 6 foot tall men to fuck is well tolerated even tho no one has suggested as suchBruh how about you define what you mean by
in the sense that they should be making efforts to get up to the new standard.
casual sex requires consent from all partiesUh, no. Women have casual sex with men all the time. How about you read that again, but in actual context.
Youre literally suggesting that women shouldnt take their consent seriously because fucking some random dude is a low ask