Yes, they're called billionaires.So youre arguing she should have targeted the.wealthy?
Thats it. I forgot how to phrase it but thats it. This ad makes it feels like Reeses Oreos are my fault.Thank you
Damn at least try them first before condemning it entirely...In this reactionary culture?
Damn I'm gonna have to try theseDoesntMatter posted...
omfg these are gonna be goodAgreed and agreed!
Even HD2D is not safe from Square's push for action RPGs.If only that trailer had been immediately followed by one for a turn based one
Reese's took a good thing, peanut butter cups, and decided to ruin them with "fillings".Plain cups will still be there. Its not ruined if there are consumers for them.
Limited edition why? In hindsight, this should have happened many, many years ago.From what I read the cookies will be until supplies run out and then return as a permanent item in January. The cups I think will be permanent from the start.
Splinter as Yoshi. For as silly as tmnt is it's probably even sillier that Splinter was really just a rat in a cage that learned martial arts and then got mutated after the fact.Yeah I was just thinking about that. Kinda funny how the much more serious film made such a silly claim that an ordinary rat learned ninjitsu just by mimicking its owner.
Yes, I'm sure "wait this out" will be a sound strategy to oppose the group making sweeping, systemic change to our institutions of government, while also openly preparing to rig the congressional maps in their favor.Oh dont worry, he says we have a system in place to prevent that and since he wont reply to yours or my posts pointing out how those systems are being dismantled in front of our eyes that must not actually be happening.
....okay, that was a typo in the headlineAt least it was an accurate one.
Oh nowhere did I say "equally", I'm outright saying serious crimes are worse than believing/saying terrible things and being a jerk professionally.Being famous and using that fame to prop up the most evil government in history is up there with the most serious crimes. Helping Trump goes FAR beyond believing/saying terrible things. He was complicit in the total enshitification of all existence.
We have a system in place to prevent that.I try my best to stay out of the doomer mindset and cling on to hope that all of this can be turned around, but JESUS FUCK how naive do you have to be to think the systems that are aggressively being dismantled right in front of our eyes are just automatically going to save us in the end?
There's a different to losing to Trump and not even trying to fight back.Ive never seen you post anything I disagree with so Ill concede the point.
I'm a Trump supporter," Robertson told Reuters. "But I just don't think the raids are the answer."Im just amazed when they have the balls to admit it. They have to know absolutely nobody is going to sympathize with them.
translation: I was fine with all of his horrible policies until it affected ME!
Fuck this dude and everyone like him. I hope he loses thousands
.
The Mirror universe detour was the better part of season one. Still not great but compared to what it did to the Klingons it was fun at least. I do feel that first season tainted the show and it would have been better if it was always a far off sequel, even if they kept the crew lost in time premise. Also Saru needed to be main character. Yeah I know I'm repeating myself.Yeah Ill agree the Mirror Universe stuff was the better part of season one, just not as good as past Mirror Universe stuff. Also Harry Mudd was a standout in season one, especially his second appearance. As I said I just feel everything after the time jump to be the real show as thats where it stood on its own and became its own thing.
Gina Yashere as Lura Thok, a Klingon/Jem'Hadar hybrid Starfleet Academy instructor and Captain Ake's first officerWhy. Nothing in that screams development that couldnt happen in 700 years of history.
I just read this on the Wikipedia page.... This is a mistake right?....Right? This stupidity is raising another red flag for me.
No one is against having men being able to request male drivers. Don't strawman.Well said and a very reasonable response, which probably means that poster will respond in turn by tripling down on their bad take.
Because it isn't sexist. Not everything that is divided between genders is sexist. This is about safety and you'd rather feign outrage to troll or you just have shitty, unfounded opinions.
Let me really spell this out for you. It's not sexist because the feature isn't about preference for preference's sake. It's about addressing a documented safety imbalance. The overwhelming majority of harassment and assault incidents in rideshares are committed by men against women, not the other way around. Thats why this is being implemented.
If there were equivalent data showing men face similar risks from women drivers, then sure, a men-only request feature without supplying a women-only request feature would be valid. But thats not the case. Equality isnt always about treating every group identicallyits about responding to real-world risks and needs.
Uber isnt banning men from rides or punishing male drivers. The system just gives women the option to feel safer, which in turn could make more women comfortable driving for Uber (a field thats still overwhelmingly male).
Posting support of Luigi, the millionaire who gets celebrated for murder, to celebrate the brutal death of a random millionaire who evidently didnt actually do anything particularly bad at all. With no sense of irony.I actually posted it with no opinion on the matter at all. It just seemed too obvious a reference to pass up. People like their Luigi references and we actually have an elephant power up in the newest game. Maybe poor taste (ironic if Im harped on for this one example when so many here post so much worse) but no malicious intent here.
Peak CE
Did what?Sorry thought it was self explanatory. I was surprised nobody else posted Elephant Luigi from Super Mario Wonder as a Luigi/dead CEO reference.
Well those would be reprehensible things to think.In that case Id be more likely to wish Tyson was treated more like Hogan than the other way around.
Mainly just because I think there's a sort of bias where people weigh public statements more heavily against someone than private actions. Like how AEW had Hogan banned for life due to his leaked racist tirade and weak apology, yet let Tyson in despite him being a convicted rapist and his similarly weak apology for it. I just never really understood that type of moral dissonance. But others have explained that levels of repentance and/or just time passed since similar behavior are also a factor.
Quantity =/= quality. But yeah, there's an echo nowadays.Yes. I somewhat like what we have now.
This. Why the fuck are we giving AOC a pass on this?She said its because the amendment didnt actually do that. Waiting for some of those speaking out to address that little point.
Crazy,Thats how it goes.
maybe this should provoke a little self reflection on the tendency to instantly turn on people.Yeah pretty sick. Also notable that AoC gets hit with vandalism and death threats and most of the discourse on CE from the politically minded is hur hur MTG Magic The Gathering jokes.
Or not
Honestly? Good. It was a betrayal from her on funding IsraelAre you equally ecstatic over her death threats?