MZero had one yeah.
I have a thought that just popped into my head that I want thoughts on.Ok now this one is just bad.
People asked asked me why a scum team of red/ctes would claim this redirection if it didn't really happen.
Someone today theorized that FD could be an arsonist role. What if red/ctes claimed a fake redirection with this fear? If FD is an arsonist, they could be lying about who got the 'love' so that FD won't target red with it, thinking he already has one.
I'm guessing I won't be there only one restricted by the day. For now my vote remains on Ctes, if it's clear that simply won't happen then Ill probably switch to red, rather than MI. I would probably still lynch Ben over MI as well. But that's where my heads at right now since there might not be much opportunity later.
Why Red over MI? I know everyone's gonna be busy but if you elaborated on why you place MI over Red or especially Ben, I'll go look for it. But that's rather puzzling to me.
This is a very curious take because I'm very certain the last time i had a dumb lengthy day 1 talk with you i was town.
Also even though red has felt better since day 3 I can't shake how disingenuous and disinterested red felt before that, going back to his night 1 argument with me. If he had been killed on an early night he would have contributed absolutely nothing to the game, it does not feel like a red who was worried about being night killed.
MI/Death and perhaps one of Blade/IGCD/Ben depending on how strong roles they have. That's my current guess. Blade will not be kept alive long if he's town doctor so not much reason to worry about that.I mentioned last night MI/Death is one of the likeliest pairings left on the board.
This is a very curious take because I'm very certain the last time i had a dumb lengthy day 1 talk with you i was town.
[8] Knightz - (Taco/Mzero), (Taco/Mzero), (Ulti), (Ulti), Taco/Mzero, Wallz, (Ulti), Isquen, FD, (IGCD), Kirby, (IGCD), MI, (IGCD), Ulti, DeathHe never got within 2 of knightz, my vote there was during the very first post of the game because I had to make sure he was real. It was never a real vote on him and had been long removed before he ever got another vote.
[3] MI - (IGCD), (Knightz), Red, (Ulti), Peaf, Chang
Death/MI with Red town also makes this make sense. MI's lynch is town driven and MI/Death jumped on Knightz late to make sure he died over MI. MI got within 2 of Knightz and I was personally floating the idea of voting MI myself.
That was you helping me prepare for my December Disney trip, right? Not you arguing pointlessly about D&D availability and not even attempting or counter voting me for what was a genuine reaction to you appearing to be done with your session only to disappear.This one was actually related to the game even.
&D availability and not even attempting or counter voting me for what was a genuine reaction to you appearing to be done with your session only to disappear.I never appeared to be done with my session.
I mentioned last night MI/Death is one of the likeliest pairings left on the board.
Death's has a very weak voting history where his only two memorable placements are dead last on a long-dead Knightz day 1 (and MI was also on Knightz very late), and that inexplicable vote on Ben yesterday that felt like it came out of nowhere.
I can remember very little in the way of interaction between the two players and very little in the way of reads between the two players directed towards each other.
He never got within 2 of knightz, my vote there was during the very first post of the game because I had to make sure he was real. It was never a real vote on him and had been long removed before he ever got another vote.The vote was at one point 6-4 which is all that really matters.
I'm not getting into it again. If you want to read why I was right to question you then the first topic is still there.
I never appeared to be done with my session.Can we not
You literally and continue to ignore that you misread the tense of my sentences.
You literally and continue to ignore that you misread the tense of my sentences.
The vote was at one point 6-4 which is all that really matters.Oh fair enough, I was counting the totals voters on vs what knightz ended with.
Oh fair enough, I was counting the totals voters on MI vs what knightz ended with.
Also Blade if MI is scum than every lynch that day was scum, so what does that even say?
It wouldn't be the first time that day 1 was between 3 scum. I've certainly fallen into the trap of believing that sort of thing is "too unlikely" before.
If he had been killed on an early night he would have contributed absolutely nothing to the game, it does not feel like a red who was worried about being night killed.
I clarified it at multiple points and you just ignored it.
I recognize your tense now. You made no attempt to clarify on the moment which would have been easy to do since it was CLEAR what my thoughts were.