Uh does any Pokemon game include all the Pokemon?
Ultra lame
Can't believe that there are a few people defending this
sucks for people that care about that but I really don't, I like trying out new pokes
I'll say yea, more is always better obviously but I'm not torn up about it
They all did until the Let's Go games.
Mewtwo59 posted...
They all did until the Let's Go games.
Ruby and Sapphire started out just like Sword and Shield are going to, with only the Pokmon in their regional dex. The missing ones weren't made available until FireRed and LeafGreen, or in some cases Emerald.
LordoftheMorons posted...
Ultra lame
Can't believe that there are a few people defending this
Not even Serebii himself is defending this, and people have accused him of blindly defending almost every decision made by Game Freak.
https://twitter.com/JoeMerrick/status/1138495077385457665
sucks for people that care about that but I really don't, I like trying out new pokes
I'll say yea, more is always better obviously but I'm not torn up about it
Mewtwo59 posted...
They all did until the Let's Go games.
Ruby and Sapphire started out just like Sword and Shield are going to, with only the Pokmon in their regional dex. The missing ones weren't made available until FireRed and LeafGreen, or in some cases Emerald.
Anyway, best video I could find
1:08 - 1:52
tldw - "we didn't have time so we cut the Pokemon in the game"
Nanis23 posted...
Anyway, best video I could find
1:08 - 1:52
tldw - "we didn't have time so we cut the Pokemon in the game"
I don't know why the developer of one of the largest IPs in the world runs their development like an indie game company.
There's a lot of people being like "they're probably saving this for the third version for money"
but I can't think any time game freak cut a fan loved feature and then brought it back in a third game. They just like to cut stuff.
Oh well, it just means I save money on not having to buy pokemon this gen.
Nanis23 posted...
Anyway, best video I could find
1:08 - 1:52
tldw - "we didn't have time so we cut the Pokemon in the game"
I don't know why the developer of one of the largest IPs in the world runs their development like an indie game company.
Mewtwo59 posted...
Nanis23 posted...
Anyway, best video I could find
1:08 - 1:52
tldw - "we didn't have time so we cut the Pokemon in the game"
I don't know why the developer of one of the largest IPs in the world runs their development like an indie game company.
As I said in another topic, Game Freak is on a tight schedule when developing each new generation of games:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/77778761/923131495
So hire more people. They have the money for it.
Literally nobody asked for the idiotic Dynamax thing if they had just left gameplay as it is and included all of the Pokemon it would've been so much better. Smh.
ExThaNemesis posted...
Literally nobody asked for the idiotic Dynamax thing if they had just left gameplay as it is and included all of the Pokemon it would've been so much better. Smh.
I prefer having Dynamax at the expense of some pokes I probably wont ever use anyways.
I understand people being pissed about it for sure, but it doesnt bother me much at all.
You'd think a switch game can easily handle 800+ pokemon.
Even if I wouldnt care about catching them all, this is a dumb decision.
htaeD posted...
You'd think a switch game can easily handle 800+ pokemon.
Even if I wouldnt care about catching them all, this is a dumb decision.
The game can handle that many, its just that they didnt have development time to include that many.
MoogleKupo141 posted...
htaeD posted...
You'd think a switch game can easily handle 800+ pokemon.
Even if I wouldnt care about catching them all, this is a dumb decision.
The game can handle that many, its just that they didnt have development time to include that many.
Not true. It's just a fact that Snorlax takes up a significant amount of data.
Zigzagoon posted...
ExThaNemesis posted...
Literally nobody asked for the idiotic Dynamax thing if they had just left gameplay as it is and included all of the Pokemon it would've been so much better. Smh.
I prefer having Dynamax at the expense of some pokes I probably wont ever use anyways.
I understand people being pissed about it for sure, but it doesnt bother me much at all.
You're Ermine, so you should know it's your favorites that are getting cut.
Pay for a subscription to hold your Pokemon prisoner until the next time they appear in a game, which could be years.
That said the more I think about it, if this means everybody you battle won't have the same three legendaries on their team then I'm sorta okay with this temporarily