Airship_Canon posted...
Again, you miss the point of "subjective morality". You look at this situation and go "yeah that's evil", but fail to get that there's someone on the other side of the coin, back in say 1828 and such, who sees the economic boon as more "right" than avoiding the human suffering.
yeah but they'd be wrong
you can introduce subjectivity into all three of these. "what the people want" is subjective, "what's best for them" definitely is. it's pointless to introduce because it makes all three options exactly the same.
you're just trying to justify your shitty politics tbh
Congrats to
BKSheikah
, who knows more about years than anyone else.