LightSnake posted...
It's essentially "police have no real duty of care," even when there's a restraining order to be enforced. That Souter and Breyer joined in on this is genuinely insane and Ginsburg and Stevens dissent is VERY compelling
Right. I just remember Mr. TeXtUaLiSt Scalia pontificating for a long while specifically about how shall is suggestive language and doesn't create a mandate. I'm still not quite over reading that nonsense 13 years later