Why would the cops do anything? They werent the ones being harassed.
More blood on the hands of Castle Rock and Scalia.
And of course, the guy was a fan of Tate, Kirk, etc
Must be why the first thing I see at that link are ads to Charlie Kirk "Freedom" hats.
Genuinely one of the most underrated worst rulingsDo you have a decent source to read up on it?
Do you have a decent source to read up on it?
Do you have a decent source to read up on it?
Is there a picture of the killer?
Woman got restraining order against ex husband who then kidnapped their three daughters. Woman called multiple times to report the kidnapping and police did nothing. Girls wound up murdered.I know the basics, I just want a better idea.
Scalia's reasoning that police weren't at fault is literally because the order read shall which OBVIOUSLY was to be interpreted as the police should enforce it but not must
https://ffcolorado.com/a-lesson-in-castle-rock-history-us-supreme-court-decision-involving-the-town/Cheers, I'll thumb through that this afternoon.
Here's a quick link for it.
Woman got restraining order against ex husband who then kidnapped their three daughters. Woman called multiple times to report the kidnapping and police did nothing. Girls wound up murdered.
Scalia's reasoning that police weren't at fault is literally because the order read shall which OBVIOUSLY was to be interpreted as the police should enforce it but not must
Oh, the perp is distantly related to the police chief.Close enough for a wrongful death suit?
Just saying
Yeah, he's a generic looking white dude.What!? The psychotic person was a MAGA chud!?
Apparently his last straw (From his youtube) was her making a negative comment about Charlie Kirk
Since the killer was the same age, they most likely wrote it off as teenagers having a squabble.
Like when teachers ignore shit before a school gets shot up.
Equating police not handling complaints properly to teachers not being equipped to handle disputes/bullying/etc. between students is kinda wild. There is an extremely wide chasm between the power police have, and the power teachers have.
There is legitimately no purpose of police existing if they don't have a duty to protect people. That is supposed to be the reason they exist.They exist for insecure bullies to live out the power fantasies, and defending the rich.
There is legitimately no purpose of police existing if they don't have a duty to protect people. That is supposed to be the reason they exist.Nah fam the police exist to protect the property of the bourgeoisie.
It's essentially "police have no real duty of care," even when there's a restraining order to be enforced. That Souter and Breyer joined in on this is genuinely insane and Ginsburg and Stevens dissent is VERY compelling
Right. I just remember Mr. TeXtUaLiSt Scalia pontificating for a long while specifically about how shall is suggestive language and doesn't create a mandate. I'm still not quite over reading that nonsense 13 years laterFucking LOL.