Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming docket

Current Events

Page of 2
Current Events » Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming docket
CARRRNE_ASADA posted...
Like is there a possibility that somebody will contest interracial marriage and appeal to the SC? That would be something

https://fox59.com/indiana-news/sen-mike-braun-said-interracial-marriage-ruling-should-be-left-to-states/

In a media call on Tuesday, U.S Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind) said that the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong to legalize interracial marriage in a ruling that stretches back to Loving v. Virginia in 1967.
darkace77450 posted...
https://fox59.com/indiana-news/sen-mike-braun-said-interracial-marriage-ruling-should-be-left-to-states/
So it begins. Now all that's left is one racist asshole to start a case by refusing to sign off on one.

I really want to see the self hating Hodgetwins reaction to this.
The Bill of Rights should be for everyone... except it isnt
Current Events » Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming docket
Page of 2