Marvel's Kevin Feige Considering Bringing Jonathan Majors Back To The MCU

Current Events

Page of 4
Current Events » Marvel's Kevin Feige Considering Bringing Jonathan Majors Back To The MCU
https://www.screengeek.net/2025/02/03/jonathan-majors-mcu-kevin-feige/

The actor was first dropped by Marvel Studios on December 18, 2023, not long after he was found guilty on two misdemeanor charges that followed after a March 2023 argument with his former girlfriend, Grace Jabbari. The legal situation shook the entertainment landscape and as a result, Majors lost several roles in addition to being dropped by Marvel. In April 2024, he was sentenced to serve 52 weeks at an in-person domestic violence intervention program.
According to our sources, Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige is considering bringing Jonathan Majors back into the MCU. The idea is for Majors to appear in a future Marvel project to wrap up some loose ends with Kang and close the characters story.
lmao, spine of wet linguini
Ring the bells that still can ring/Forget your perfect offering/There is a crack in everything/That's how the light gets in."- RIP, Leonard Cohen
Their source is they made it the fuck up.

Very important to note that this has no real actual sources.
Marvel needs a continuous storyline. Majors was Kang.

If they want anything to be successful (starting with the new Captain America this month)they need him to play the villain.

Btw I don't support anything that guy did.

Ernest Morgan: November 15, 1956-September 28, 2010: Best dad in the world.
jefffan posted...
Marvel needs a continuous storyline. Majors was Kang.

If they want anything to be successful (starting with the new Captain America this month)they need him to play the villain.

Btw I don't support anything that guy did.

Marvel needs such a continuous storyline they replaced Terence Howard with Don Cheadle, but the guy who can look like anyone?
Ring the bells that still can ring/Forget your perfect offering/There is a crack in everything/That's how the light gets in."- RIP, Leonard Cohen
jefffan posted...
If they want anything to be successful (starting with the new Captain America this month)they need him to play the villain.

Kang is character they can change actors for and it would make sense in world
Imagine if Thanos was taken out by Hawkeye in Infinity War before he could even do anything. That's Kang now even if he did come back.
NNID: GuerillaGorilla
No way they bring Majors back. They might bring Kang back but not Majors. They've recasted characters before, it's not a big deal.
The Legend is True!
He was incredible as all the different variants of Kang

But still, fuck that guy.
https://i.imgtc.com/MGGa6Os.gif
Not coming back. He is convicted of assault.

Gunn was just a big troll online which was forgivable.
f(O_o)f
Btw, this is a rumor. I forgot to add that.
GuerillaGorilla posted...
Imagine if Thanos was taken out by Hawkeye in Infinity War before he could even do anything. That's Kang now even if he did come back.

Marvel had their top new villain beaten by Ant Man.
Ring the bells that still can ring/Forget your perfect offering/There is a crack in everything/That's how the light gets in."- RIP, Leonard Cohen
Just give the role to Chukwudi Iwuji and retcon it so the High Evolutionary was a Kang variant. He captured the exact same energy and threat level in that role, and arguably better than Majors did.
He can get a redemption story but it may be a bit soon
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
He can get a redemption story but it may be a bit soon

I'm all for second chances, but has he even shown any remorse or attempts to better himself?
Ring the bells that still can ring/Forget your perfect offering/There is a crack in everything/That's how the light gets in."- RIP, Leonard Cohen
LightSnake posted...
Marvel had their top new villain beaten by Ant Man.

It took ant man, and army of thousands, 3 other superheroes, one of the smartest men on the planet to beat him, and he still only oost because ant man got lucky. And this was a Kang without any of his main tech or resources working with scraps.

Why do yall keep peddling this lie like ant man soloed him? First off ant man is several leagues above Hawkeye in power level, and took down a chitauri cruiser.

Like it's so disingenuous of an argument. Like saying thanos got beat by an axe in IW.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
TMOG posted...
Just give the role to Chukwudi Iwuji and retcon it so the High Evolutionary was a Kang variant. He captured the exact same energy and threat level in that role, and arguably better than Majors did.

He was great, would love to see him again
The Legend is True!
TMOG posted...
Just give the role to Chukwudi Iwuji and retcon it so the High Evolutionary was a Kang variant. He captured the exact same energy and threat level in that role, and arguably better than Majors did.

High evolutionary is a scientist. Kang is a warlord.

High evolutionary got thrashed by rocket raccoon. He has no fighting capabilities. High evolutionary is insane.

It took an army to beat a low end Kang. Not kangs army, Kang by himself. "Same threat level" my ass.

They arent the same. They arent even remotely the same.

Did yall even watch the movie yall are discussing, or read a summary on Wikipedia or soemthing.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
It took ant man, and army of thousands, 3 other superheroes, one of the smartest men on the planet to beat him, and he still only oost because ant man got lucky. And this was a Kang without any of his main tech or resources working with scraps.

Why do yall keep peddling this lie like ant man soloed him? First off ant man is several leagues above Hawkeye in power level, and took down a chitauri cruiser.

Like it's so disingenuous of an argument. Like saying thanos got beat by an axe in IW.

This really doesn't mater, tbqh. end of the day, Marvel introduced their terrifying new big bad and had him humiliated in an Ant Man film where a CGI Cory Stoll head sacrifices himself screaming "I'm not a dick."

Bad, bad, bad decision making and writing. End of the day, don't have Ant Man beat your new big villain if you want to see him as a threat and no Thermian Argument changes that. It's more like if you had Thanos beaten in a Hawkeye movie.

End of the day, Ant Man 3 was complete shit, whereas at least Thanos felt like an epic level threat and was taking out Avenger after Avenger. Nobody gives a damn about the "Quantum Verse" and its little CGI armies. If you intend a villain to be a real, genuine threat, you don't have them lose to Ant Man
Ring the bells that still can ring/Forget your perfect offering/There is a crack in everything/That's how the light gets in."- RIP, Leonard Cohen
TMOG posted...
Just give the role to Chukwudi Iwuji and retcon it so the High Evolutionary was a Kang variant. He captured the exact same energy and threat level in that role, and arguably better than Majors did.

I'm honestly cool with this
I have nothing else to say
MC_BatCommander posted...
He was great, would love to see him again

He's still alive too, so easy enough to bring him back for something
I have nothing else to say
LightSnake posted...
This really doesn't mater, tbqh."

No no no, it does tho. Me refuting the entire premise of your argument, yes that matters.

Bad, bad, bad decision making and writing

You dont have to like the movie. None of it changes that ant man is both a formidable superhero on his own(so much so that fans speculated he COULD solo Thanos prior to endgame coming out) and that Kang is an extreme formidable villain.

Yourr trying to say the character is weak because you didn't like the movie. Thats not how this works. We both know that .

Ronan the excuser gets beaten by the guardians. Doesnt mean he wasn't a literal planet buster at the end of the movie.

The movie wasn't even bad either.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Just say Kang died on the way back to his home planet and move on.
http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif
Toonstrack posted...
High evolutionary is a scientist. Kang is a warlord.

High evolutionary got thrashed by rocket raccoon. He has no fighting capabilities. High evolutionary is insane.

It took an army to beat a low end Kang. Not kangs army, Kang by himself. "Same threat level" my ass.

They arent the same. They arent even remotely the same.

Did yall even watch the movie yall are discussing, or read a summary on Wikipedia or soemthing.
Literally every single line you just wrote is either wrong or insincere. I'm on mobile so can't break it down bit by bit, so I'll just start by stating that Kang is also a scientist, it's LITERALLY why and how he became a warlord in the first place. He also augments his own physical abilities using technology, exactly how HE did.
Ivynn posted...
Just say Kang died on the way back to his home planet and move on.

They already have an explanation for why Kang doesn't show up. All of them are trapped currently outside of time. The one that was in ant man 3 is dead
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
TMOG posted...
Literally every single line you just wrote is either wrong or insincere. I'm on mobile so can't break it down bit by bit, so I'll just start by stating that Kang is also a scientist,

Did I say Kang wasn't a scientist?

High Evolutionary is JUST a scientist. Kang is not.

Nothing I said was wrong, or insincere. The argument that Kang and HE are in any way similar is the insincere argument. Its the same "black panther is basically batman" BS
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
No no no, it does tho. Me refuting the entire premise of your argument, yes that matters.

Except it doesn't matter. It's already been firmly established that not every variant of Kang is interested in being a warlord and Loki establishes that Kang is literally a scientist.

Not to mention that High Evo's goal was to create a "perfect" version of the world with Counter-Earth, which honestly isn't all that different from what other Kangs have done.
I have nothing else to say
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Except it doesn't matter. It's already been firmly established that not every variant of Kang is interested in being a warlord and Loki establishes that Kang is literally a scientist.

What does that change about the fact that THE Kang we saw in ant man is absorbed an avengers level threat, which is what I was taking about?

And no, it was not established that not every Kang wants to be a warlord. It was aestablushed that most of them have been prevented from being warlords because they were all trapped by AM3 kang.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
even if this dude has repented and changed his ways, im not sure if i wanna see Kang again after what they did to him in Quantumania. lmao
Toonstrack posted...
Did I say Kang wasn't a scientist?

High Evolutionary is JUST a scientist. Kang is not.

Nothing I said was wrong, or insincere. The argument that Kang and HE are in any way similar is the insincere argument. Its the same "black panther is basically batman" BS
Compare Kang to He Who Remains and Victor Timely.
Toonstrack posted...
What does that change about the fact that THE Kang we saw in ant man is absorbed an avengers level threat, which is what I was taking about?

I'm pretty sure that guy was arguing that High Evo should be a variant of Kang, and not literally the variant from Quantumania
I have nothing else to say
Who am I to doubt the sources at ScreenGeek?
...I think I'm done here...
TMOG posted...
Compare Kang to He Who Remains and Victor

He who remains itself refures this entire silly argument lmao.

He who remains is proof that Kang already *won* at the end of time. That was before Ant man 3 even came out that we knew this.

"Ant man beat him" nah; he beat everyone already. He won. You guys weren't paying attention. He was sitting there writing the script for the universe, shaping it to his design.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
I'm pretty sure that guy was arguing that High Evo should be a variant of Kang, and not literally the variant from Quantumania

Youre responding to the wrong comment. I was responding to lightsnake, who like several others is pretending that Kang was weak in ant man 3 because they didn't care for the movie.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Murphiroth posted...
Their source is they made it the fuck up.

Very important to note that this has no real actual sources.


Hayame_Zero posted...
Who am I to doubt the sources at ScreenGeek?

These. C'mon, guys.
Psn/GT: GundamFanT Nintendo Code: SW-1394-8994-8299
"Let's Just Wait It Out. You Know We Can... Be All Poetic And Just Lose Our Minds Together."
Toonstrack posted...
He who remains itself refures this entire silly argument lmao.

He who remains is proof that Kang already *won* at the end of time. That was before Ant man 3 even came out that we knew this.

"Ant man beat him" nah; he beat everyone already. He won. You guys weren't paying attention. He was sitting there writing the script for the universe, shaping it to his design.

He Who Remains and Kang the Conqueror are clearly very different variants. One was a well-intentioned extremist who saw what he did as a necessity, and the other was just a genocidal warlord who sought to conquer the multiverse.

In fact, their goals are diametrically opposed.
I have nothing else to say
GundamFanT posted...
These. C'mon, guys.

These rumor mills stay afloat because whatever they peddle it gets ppl talking. Sometimes its accurate(like surfer being a woman in F4FS) and sometimes it's made up BS
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
He Who Remains and Kang the Conqueror are clearly very different variants. One was a well-intentioned extremist who saw what he did as a necessity, and the other was just a genocidal warlord who sought to conquer the multiverse.

In fact, their goals are diametrically opposed.

Its almost like it was established that the Kang variants are in a war amongst themselves because their goals conflict....

None of that changes that he who remains is "a" kang variant that won, by controlling the flow of time itself.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Going to bat for the MCU Kang plot at this point is like arguing that the Titanic would've proven itself beyond a shadow of a doubt to be unsinkable if only the weather had been a little warmer.
Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read.
Toonstrack posted...
He who remains itself refures this entire silly argument lmao.

He who remains is proof that Kang already *won* at the end of time. That was before Ant man 3 even came out that we knew this.

"Ant man beat him" nah; he beat everyone already. He won. You guys weren't paying attention. He was sitting there writing the script for the universe, shaping it to his design.
Holy shit, have you been arguing in this entire topic without even understanding the core concept of the character?!
Toonstrack posted...
Youre responding to the wrong comment. I was responding to lightsnake, who like several others is pretending that Kang was weak in ant man 3 because they didn't care for the movie.

He was weak. The problem with Kang in Ant-Man 3 is that a lot of his threat was told to us instead of adequately demonstrated to us. He gives us a whole story about how he's killed countless Avengers across the multiverse, including the likes of Thor and Ant-Man himself, and yet he gets solo'd by Ant-Man and Wasp.

That does not look good for a villain who we're expected to treat as though they're the next Thanos. And I don't even hate Ant-Man 3.
I have nothing else to say
masterpug53 posted...
Going to bat for the MCU Kang

Never said you had to like Kang. Don't lie and tell me he's weak like a powerscaler tho bechas you didn't pay attention to the movie.

The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
Its almost like it was established that the Kang variants are in a war amongst themselves because their goals conflict....

None of that changes that he who remains is "a" kang variant that won, by controlling the flow of time itself.

Except you're missing one small detail: He Who Remains won precisely by defeating the other variants
I have nothing else to say
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
He was weak

He wasn't.

. The problem with Kang in Ant-Man 3 is that a lot of his threat was told to us instead of adequately demonstrated to us.

No, it was demonstrated to. Like that scene where the entire army tries to take him down and can't. Or the entire premise of rhe movie being that he built an empire from the ground up with no resources and it took 4 superheroes and said army to even defeat him?

This is like saying Vader is "weak" in ANH lmfao.

That does not look good for a villain who we're expected to treat as though they're the next Thanos. And I don't even hate Ant-Man 3.

Youre not supposed to treat him like thanos. They never said to treat him like Thanos. They said he's a major threat to the timeline and the avengers, and yes fhat was adequately explained AND shown multiple times.

Ppl were speculating that ant man could theoretically be strong enough solo Thanos before endgame. Now when ant man beats a villain at all that makes the villain weak? Make it make sense.

You realize doctor doom looses to the fantastic four pretty often right?
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Except you're missing one small detail: He Who Remains won precisely by defeating the other variants

Do you think that didn't involve some conquering and battle prowess lmao? Like... your own logic is leading you to the correct conclusion here.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
Youre not supposed to treat him like thanos. They never said to treat him like Thanos. They said he's a major threat to the timeline and the avengers, and yes fhat was adequately explained AND shown multiple times.

Narrator: "It was not adequately shown at any point."
Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read.
Bring him back and let Ultron make a surprise return and take him out real fast. Id take Ultron 2.0
Let's get down to brass tacks. How much for the ape?
Toonstrack posted...
Its almost like it was established that the Kang variants are in a war amongst themselves because their goals conflict....

None of that changes that he who remains is "a" kang variant that won, by controlling the flow of time itself.
So let's summarize.

You're arguing that High Evolutionary can't be retconned as a Kang variant because his goals, abilities, and methods were different.

But also that the point of the Kang variants is that they're in a war because their goals, abilities, and methods are different.
masterpug53 posted...
Narrator: "It was not adequately shown at any point."

What did you want to see that wasn't there exactly to convince you hes a palpable threat? And don't say "not lose to ant man"

Half the avengers couldn't handle ant man in civil war.
The succotash is suffering.
Comic Artist
Toonstrack posted...
It took ant man, and army of thousands, 3 other superheroes, one of the smartest men on the planet to beat him, and he still only oost because ant man got lucky. And this was a Kang without any of his main tech or resources working with scraps.

Why do yall keep peddling this lie like ant man soloed him? First off ant man is several leagues above Hawkeye in power level, and took down a chitauri cruiser.

Like it's so disingenuous of an argument. Like saying thanos got beat by an axe in IW.
It doesn't matter how strong you want him to be. It doesn't matter that it took Antman, Girl Antman, kid Antman, and cgi fodder Antmen. To the casual audience, the next Thanos lost to Ant man in his solo movie. And that's what matters. Thanos lost to the entire MCU slate and even barely. Thanos is an arc villain. Kang is a movie villain. Nobody gives a shit about that Dark elf boss in Thor 2.

And that axe bit was stupid too imo and I'm sure you've had your fill of reasons why so I won't reiterate.
NNID: GuerillaGorilla
Current Events » Marvel's Kevin Feige Considering Bringing Jonathan Majors Back To The MCU
Page of 4