Hyena_Of_Ice posted...
I don't think that was the entire reason by any means. They adopted "family values" at the beginning of the 80's due to the Evangelical infiltration of the party, which began with the Reagan administration, even though said groups were created in the 1970's.
I don't doubt that racism and anti-cult moral panic were both factors back in the 1970's, but among the less fundamental this had exponentially more to do with their red scare paranoia mentality ran rampant in the GOP since the early 1950's and the growing necessity to, at minimum, give lip service to fundamentalist voters and lobbyists in order to win elections in the 1980's.
It wasn't an "evangelical infiltration" of the party - the party deliberately went and catered to southern white segregationist evangelicals. Joseph Coors was a pro-business guy who also happened to be a racist. Paul Weyrich was a racist conservative who happened to be pro-business. Jerry Falwell was a southern evangelical racist preacher who was cool with being pro-business (Falwell protested *AGAINST* Martin Luther King Jr. in the 50s and 60s). The three of them got together and created the "Moral Majority" in the late 1970s. The entire reason the party went to try and recruit evangelicals was in order to improve their public image (being overt segregationists was no longer a popular winning strategy by the 1970s, although it seems to be making a comeback).
The entire "family values" platform of the GOP, up to and including being anti-abortion, was adopted solely to sugarcoat what they really cared about - segregation and pro-wealth policies. If you can paint the Democrats as baby-killers, then you can more easily get people to vote for economic policies that would actually screw themselves over.
Lee Atwater, a Republican political strategist, said it this way when describing Reagan and the GOP's platform.:
Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "n-word, n-word, n-word". By 1968, you can't say "n-word"that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow mebecause obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this", is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "n-word, n-word". So, any way you look at it, race is coming on the back-burner.
In other words, the GOP's entire platform was created and built around sugarcoating segregation. Bush definitely has some blame here.