Diceheist posted...
How so? I was right about Biden dropping out being good for Dems, Walz being the best running mate for Harris, Trump picking Vance being disastrous for the campaign, and Trump agreeing to debate Harris being similarly disastrous. I warned about the last two before most anyone here.
How about when you kept saying Harris would be a horrible replacement for Biden because at the time she was polling behind him in favorability and instead advocated for a contentious Democratic convention which would have inevitably led to horrible in-fighting while advocating for candidates who either A) made it clear they had no interest in running and/or B) people like Michelle Obama who made it clear they'd never want to get into politics. Meaning that anybody who did come through the convention would be some no-name Dem on the national stage who would have 1-3 months to put together a national campaign staff and fundraising to match the force that is Donald Trump. It was clear to so many people that Harris was the obviously best choice and you were shouting for anything
but
that.
Also, you are not at all special for thinking Vance was the worst possible pick, everybody here was saying that, same with him debating Harris. She was a career prosecutor and has demonstrated she has a greatly sound mind and he's a convicted criminal who has obviously been losing his mind for years. What are you so proud of? That you saw a bunch of ducks in the pond, kept shouting that they were ducks, and declared yourself a duck expert as a result? Lol
Diceheist posted...
Even Trump is (publicly) pushing a state's rights narrative over a national ban. It's mainly Heritage Foundation style fundies calling for a national ban.
Trump has literally lied on the issue all the time and at times flip-flopped from one day to the next, most notably on his position for the upcoming FL abortion amendment vote, which he did because pro-forced birth right-wingers took issue with him seemingly sounding like he was voting for the bill to end the 6 week ban. He wants to take credit for ending Roe v Wade (which he's said it was an honor to do) and then gets reminded that the majority of the nation did not actually want that, even though that's the Republican narrative, and so tries to appear moderate or reasonable on the subject when he would 100% absolutely sign a national abortion ban if it comes onto his desk. If you honestly think he wouldn't you're just reinforcing my first point.
THOSE HERITAGE FOUNDATION FUNDIES ARE THE PARTY ffs how did the Republican Primary not make that obvious to you? Trump is literally beholden to the HF, they boasted about how much of their agenda he accomplished in his term and 33 of the 38 authors were part of his administration.