worked so well for Hillary
and Trump has no platform
He has at least posted his nonsensical talking points
Honestly, TC, shut the fuck up.
we're ~70 days out from an election and she hasn't stated what she's running on
She has more than a few times said what she's going to do.
Prepare to get flamed and be called a Trumper by the brainless people on this board
worked so well for Hillary
and Trump has no platform
Why do people keep saying she has no platform like they have no clue what she's going to do or something? Do you really think she is going to be radically different from the DNC platform or something you can pull up on the website?
What are you looking for? Like literally all I need is "She doesn't want to be a dictator and she has no plans to get the military on US soil to put down expected protesters to some sort of awful plan"
What do you want?
Yes, but hasn't put it in writing.You realize of course you are grasping.
She needs to put her agenda in writing
you know what she stands for. just go ahead and start ripping her for it. you don't need a written invitation
And Trump has this:You realize she's only been the candidate for 5 weeks right?
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/issues
Harris has nothing like that on her site (yet)
huh?
you know what she stands for. just go ahead and start ripping her for it. you don't need a written invitation
You realize she's only been the candidate for 5 weeks right?Saying 5 weeks is generous. She's officially been the candidate for less than 5 days.
Trump's literally had 9 years for his policy.
Its not only that the New York Times and other mainstream outlets would create the kind of coverage that is devoured and intentionally misinterpreted by far right propaganda outfits, but that these mainstream papers and news channels would run to the nearest centrist think tank or former Obama administration official now working for some insane right-wing Silicon Valley billionaire and ask them for their thoughts on the latest progressive policy ideas. The mealymouthed centrists, proudly proclaiming that better things arent possible, will dismiss the progressive idea was pie-in-the-sky and unrealistic and chastise the Democratic policymakers for not working with their Republican counterparts, who want a swift end to American self governance and have never asked Democrats for their input in policy making. Millennials know this formula well because we have seen it play out over and over again in what has been a maddeningly unfair fight between Democrats stuck in the 1990s and Republicans ready and willing to break down any democratic guardrail to get their way (All those supposed guardrails we read about after Trumps election: Theyre all gone).
This kind of coverage feeds the far-right media echo chamber and puts the Democratic candidate on defense. Harris would be on her back foot, trying to explain away the cost of such vital programs and policies both to respectable mainstream outlets and bad-faith operators working for Republican propaganda outlets like Fox News. Harris people saw this happen to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who played the game the way major media companies want it to be played: You give us your ideas and well cover those ideas in ways to open you up to Republican attacks.
The Harris campaign, extremely online and clearly scornful of the Obama approach to politics, rightfully wants no part of that cycle, so the policy details will continue to be sparse.
The Harris campaign is the first Democratic campaign to understand that once you throw policy details into the wind, they will be used against you, never for you.
Saying 5 weeks is generous. She's officially been the candidate for less than 5 days.I don't think we have to be this pedantic; no one was doubting that she would be the nominee by the middle of the week after Biden dropped out.
I don't think we have to be this pedanticHave you seen the topic we're posting in?
'k
i said
I just want a leg to stand on when I'm arguing with chuds who claim that something she said in an interview in 2017 is "her platform" since she hasn't "officially" said otherwise
A written invitation for what? I'm not aiming to tear apart her platform. I just want a leg to stand on when I'm arguing with chuds who claim that something she said in an interview in 2017 is "her platform" since she hasn't "officially" said otherwise
Even Trump has a platform, despite people ignoring it in favor of Project 2025.I think you should really consider how this undercuts the argument you're making here.
Even Trump has a platform, despite people ignoring it in favor of Project 2025