This is like comparing a B student to a student who tried to skip out on the test, was forcibly dragged into the room and scored a zero on a entirely multiple choice test even after being given extra time.
What exactly is imperfect about 'let that decision come down to the woman and her doctor?'No but you see there's another side that wants to kill women. So we need to act like that's some kind of viable opinion to have. And because people have that opinion, then 'let that decision to come down to the woman and her doctor' cannot be a perfect response.
That's literally the perfect response.
I don't get why an article seems to say "donald trump sucks on abortion, oh and Biden isn't perfect either" is some kind of bad thing?In making it a contest of personalities and about unknowable private feelings, the article not just omits but distracts from what each candidate and their parties would do (and has done) with power.
Is someone not allowed to point out the faults of the two people in a political race? You're allowed to criticize both without it being some fence sitter position. Saying Trump is old, oh and so is Biden isn't a "both sides" thing.
I don't get why an article seems to say "donald trump sucks on abortion, oh and Biden isn't perfect either" is some kind of bad thing?Something tells me the NYT's position is not that Biden is too conservative on abortion.
Is someone not allowed to point out the faults of the two people in a political race? You're allowed to criticize both without it being some fence sitter position.
I don't get why an article seems to say "donald trump sucks on abortion, oh and Biden isn't perfect either" is some kind of bad thing?
Is someone not allowed to point out the faults of the two people in a political race? You're allowed to criticize both without it being some fence sitter position.
Why is it that everyone over 50 in America has a broken brain?Lead damage is a mother fucker
I don't get why an article seems to say "donald trump sucks on abortion, oh and Biden isn't perfect either" is some kind of bad thing?
Is someone not allowed to point out the faults of the two people in a political race? You're allowed to criticize both without it being some fence sitter position.
In making it a contest of personalities and about unknowable private feelings, the article not just omits but distracts from what each candidate and their parties would do (and has done) with power.
When abortion rights are wildly popular with the voting public, this sort of coverage muddies the waters such that Biden's stance is made weaker and Trump's stronger.
This is like comparing a B student to a student who tried to skip out on the test, was forcibly dragged into the room and scored a zero on a entirely multiple choice test even after being given extra time.
And this Politico journalist for some reason is trying to act like his profession is not relevant."look I'm sure idiots will totally believe the shit we publish"
https://twitter.com/jmart/status/1778403040132739142
There is never an issue that the media will label a republican as wrong. They'll always run interference for them and bend over backwards to rationalize their stances.
Why is that?For access. If they tell Republicans theyre wrong, they won't give them interviews.