''Who is this for'' and ''No one asked for this'' are just the dumbest criticism

ssb_yunglink2 posted...

You claimed pacing complaints are just used because there was nothing legitimate to criticize.

Thats so absolutely false. Horrible pacing has ruined many games.

is that according to you or is that a consensus that everyone who played said games had? also that does not invalidate my observation that "pacing" is a crutch-criticism that is overused to the point of redundancy.

just for the record, which games were "ruined" because of pacing issues, I'd love to know.

Hypnospace posted...

I can think of several games I enjoyed that had pacing issues. Hell, I'm playing one right now in Paper Mario.

is that an "AAA" game?

I mean your first post in this topic was being angry with someone agreeing with my assessment of "pacing" complains...

I honestly don't know how someone can have something explained to them so clearly and still be so completely lost.

Hypnospace posted...

You responded to a post complaining about the usage of "pacing" to criticize games and fully agreed with it.

I leapfrogged off a point that user made about how people on the internet love to use criticism as a tool to appear smarter than they are.

SwayM posted...

I've said for a long time that people on the internet LOVE to criticize shit because they think it makes them seem smarter than the thing or other people.

I made the same exact point on a broader scale. Saying absolutely nothing about pacing. Please stop reading into things that aren't said, you aren't even good at reading what is actually being said.

Hypnospace posted...

Point #3 is probably the funniest though

It is pretty funny. How you took

"You try to accuse others of poor comprehension, yet your entire post is spawned out of extremely poor comprehension and out of context remarks."

and then literally double downed on it in your very next post, missing the point completely. I find that very humorous indeed.

I explained it here, plain as day.

Dont speak to others about failing to understand things when you hurl pie in your own face by being so obnoxious.

And finally. Again, it's extremely weird how obsessed you are about my opinions but have nothing of value to say about them. Summarizing my opinions in a distorted, shitty tone, isn't criticism of those opinions. It's completely meaningless, and a smidge ironic given the nature of my arguments thus far.

Anyway, I'm done entertaining this silliness.

dragon's dogma 2 has dragon's dogshit pacing

They should honestly make Gamefaqs +

This shit is too good to be free sometimes.

''Who is this for'' and ''No one asked for this''

Pretty much how I feel about this topic

CrimsonGear80 posted...

It's like...did you take a f***ing poll or something?

metacritic is literally a poll of did you like thing

Hypnospace posted...

It's more like you're being laughed at because you're complaining about the world's most normal complaint that you would later prove you don't actually understand, as evidenced by post #86, and his post was even funnier because he regularly melts down over gamers not having perfect opinions about AAA games.

only you really seem to be upset, and you don;t sound like you are having much fun...

and yeah "world's most normal complaint" is not helping your argument against me...

WingsOfGood posted...

metacritic is literally a poll of did you like thing

not only is that wrong as hell but if that was actually to be believed you are basically saying that anywhere from 5-150 different individuals represent ALL people who play video games...which is NO.