ClayGuida posted...
I mean you care so much about solving homeless and nothing should stand in the way, about 1/6 of that picture is green.
Fuck city and state parks right?
The parks are there already. Why would I support additional sprawl when we can just build denser on what we already have. If we filled up all the existing good locations, then yes. Fucking keep building. We're not anywhere close to being full in the non green area though. So why would I support that now.
You're the one saying they should go build somewhere else (with that somewhere else, never being defined)