DarkChozoGhost posted...
It makes perfect sense once you consider that this bs study didn't control the causational factor. People in cities are more likely to have office jobs period. The study essentially says "Work from home benefits people with jobs that can be worked from home more than those with jobs that can't be worked from home."
The article is bullshit, trying to trick people into turning against the objective good WFH trend.
Then you run into the issue of the people making the least have to spend the most just to get by. It would be strange to say they have to go to the office because the people on the floor can't wfh. But, in a way, you could say it will further class divide.