ssb_yunglink2 posted...
But it doesnt hold up when given the slightest of thought lol. People rn are saying that IGNs 7/10 starfield review is because they werent paid enough. Like fucking microsoft isnt gonna throw all their money at perfect reviews if this was actually a thing?
yea, stuff like this totally shits on their conspiracy theories.
so, companies pay for good reviews, but Microsoft, one of the biggest companies in the world, isn't willing to pay for better reviews for Starfield, one of the biggest titles to come out this gen?
something isn't adding up
also, not giving video game press access/advertising due to poor/not the greatest reviews wouldn't be the smartest option since it means less press for their games.