Wyoming governor calls trans athlete ban bill 'draconian' and then passes it

Current Events

CyricZ posted...
A veto would have been a clear message to the voters that you are against it.

If he is not vetoing it, he's not against it, no matter what he says in a letter.

These "performative actions" fucking matter when you're a politician elected by the people.

The reason he chose no action is as someone already pointed out, plausible deniability come the next election: centrism bullshit.

he understands that it matters, and made the best decision for himself. he wants to keep being elected